User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamilton High School (Scottdale, Georgia) (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winged Blades of Godric was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES; trivial mentions in sources, which FWIW, includes Arcadia Publishing, with a shoddy reputation of peer-review.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
∯WBGconverse 05:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Albert Percy Godber has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Albert Percy Godber. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 07:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Living Arts and Science Center (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The references should primarily relate to the building - see WP:NBUILDING
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanley Smith (actor) (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails to establish how it meets the criteria of WP:NACTOR. Needs to identify which notable films he actually had a lead role in.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:28, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:William B. Kinkead has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:William B. Kinkead. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 07:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plymouth Tube (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NCOMPANY, lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. Requires significant coverage (not mentions in passing) in multiple independent (not press releases or information taken from the company website) reliable secondary sources. A number of the references are deadlinks or no longer active.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:24, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugenia Dunlap Potts (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NAUTHOR, requires significant coverage (not mentions in passing) in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 13:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: André De Takacs (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NCREATIVE, requires significant coverage, not a collection of mentions in passing, in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 13:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilbert & Friedland (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP: GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 13:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DC Solar (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NCOMPANY, lacks WP:CORPDEPTH. Most of the information appears to be original research, lacking sources and references.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 13:16, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert Percy Godber (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:
Needs more sources, and a major copyedit. You may wish to ask for help at the AfC Helpdesk.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 17:18, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Richard V. Moore has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Richard V. Moore. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 02:43, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pisgah Academy (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still fails WP:NSCHOOL, needs more significant coverage then a series of comments that there are some photographs of the building in various collections - does not establish notability. That a number of individuals who are notable does not establish notability (WP:NOTINHERITED)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sharp sand has been accepted

Sharp sand, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred R. Stanton (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NACTOR, fails to identify which notable films did he have a significant roles in. Statements like "has a memorable knife fight with the star" adds no value or insight into the subject and doesn't contribute as to the subject's notability. The creator should take the time and not submit half-baked, poorly worded & referenced stub drafts.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:57, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kinkeadtown has been accepted

Kinkeadtown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:44, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Douglas Bronston has been accepted

Douglas Bronston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 20:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:André De Takacs has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:André De Takacs. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 03:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: André De Takacs (December 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 10:58, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard V. Moore (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sentences about the photographs is purely trivia and adds no value or substance to the article. So instead of adding trivia maybe the editor should be adding factual information about the subject and the contributions which he made, which would establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:10, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
I see this has now been created. Great job fixing it up and expanding it. For U.S. subjects we usually write dates month day, year. But that's a minor issue. It's interesting he taught in Clearwater before his college presidency. I swear I saw that he taught after his retirement but the dates don't jibe that way. Weird. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:51, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
FloridaArmy that is the quality of article that you should be producing, given your editing history - not these half-baked drafts, which you include random referenced sentences, which are not clear as to their relevance. Rather than repeatedly pumping out these poor quality drafts and having them continually rejected you should take the time to ensure that they are properly written and formatted, so that they are worthy of being included as encyclopedic quality articles. You really should be taking pride in your work rather than trying to impress by the sheer volume of your contributions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
I'm always happy to have help. Wikipedia is a collaborative enterprise not individual editors finishing articles.in draft space. I had a look at your work to compare and was shocked to find misrepresentations of sources, improper sourcing, sloppy writing, misinformation, and poor organization. Fortunately I was able to fix many of these issues, but a LOT of work remains to be done. Are you familiar with a saying about people who live in glass houses throwing stones? FloridaArmy (talk) 10:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Which just goes to show that your researching is just as shoddy as your editing/article creations. As neither articles you have been recently editing were either created by me or significant edited by me. So yes I can afford to make comments about almost all the recent drafts that you have created. Dan arndt (talk) 10:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Well your userpage displays a barnstar that thanks you "for the work you did" on those articles. Why do you proudly show off something that you say is false? Seems dishonest. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:57, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
I didn't award the Barnstar, so if you have an issue - raise it with that editor. Dan arndt (talk) 11:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
It's 9n your userpage. Please remove it if it's untrue. Whether it's articles you created or drafts you've worked on you work is sloppy and the writing quality poor. I'm done arguing with you. It's a large encyclopedia please find other areas to work and stop stalking my controbutions, harassing me, and bullying me. Thanks. Also, don't post here any more. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ian Bagg has been accepted

Ian Bagg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:18, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andre Michel (Haiti) has been accepted

Andre Michel (Haiti), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Taewangkorea (talk) 17:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Satti (rapper) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Satti (rapper), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William B. Kinkead (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
As the comment sys, this needs to be divided into two articles, and then the two articles each nee to be expanded. For each person,we need to know birth date, and death date and education. We ned to know for the judge what exactly he was judge of, and when, and what else he may have done--he was presumably a lawyer/For the writer, we need to know if she married, and how many children. We need to know not just a sister, but who the sister is. What exactly did she write, and who published it, and were there reviews.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 01:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Alton Redd concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Alton Redd, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wells Moses Sawyer (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This is not enough to meet WP:CREATIVE
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 05:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Question: FA, why are you writing articles on figures as minor as this one? You have enough experience that you must know there will be problems if you go this close to the borderline. Do you actually like having them the subject of AfD discussions, and making work for reviewers like me- you know I have an almost irresistible temptation to try to improve borderline articles thta just possibly might become encyclopedia - worthy. I need to use it for those cases where the people are highly notable and the contributors unable to do the work properly by themselves. You don't need my guidance, really. You can be more selective yourself There's probably a few hundred 19th century Americans where more could be said than this. DGG ( talk ) 06:18, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

User:DGG Answer: Because he's not a minor figure. He's a very important and prominent artist, photographer, and illustratrator who's work was part of important archeological expeditions, is part of major museum collections, is discussed in depth in reliable independent sources, and who some 80 years after his death was just recently the subject of a historical reenactment. This is all in the article and its citations. He meets GNG and all four criteria of Creative. This isn't the first time your judgment has been WAY off the mark DGG. I recall you rejected an article on Florida's secession convention as well, despite its historical significance and all the substantial coverage it received. For an experienced librarian I find the level of ignorance and misunderstandings in your statements and actions to be absolutely jaw droppingly dumbfounding. Are you serious? FloridaArmy (talk) 19:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


I know I make errors. I have probably reviewed at least 30,000 articles at various stages. Nobody works with 100% accuracy. The way WP works, and the necessary speed for reviewing, the highest attainable accuracy in reviewing is probably something like 98% accuracy--it could be 99% if there were more time to work. I've never encountered anyone that good. I think I'm at about 95%, which may be about as good as anyone else who does my amount of work and is willing to deal with tricky or borderline articles. That means that I have probably made mistakes in about 1500 artucles. As a guess, 1 in 10 of them were serious mistakes, amounting to 150 articles over the 12 years.
Fortunately, that does not mean that these articles were ended up actually decided wrong, because generally no one person decides. Even for clearly promotional articles, I just tag for speedy; another admin deletes. Even for drafts I think don't show notability , that doesn't mean they're deleted--indeed, it's deliberately set up that no draft can be deleted just for not indicating notability . There's always a chance to resubmit, and in most cases reviewers follow the practice I started and let someone else review the 2nd time.
I make errors, to be sure. But I do not think I did here. There is some disputes that photographs taken as part of a collecting trip in that museums collection meet the requirement for work in a major museum. There have been afds decided either way. I do not see any significant critical coverage of her work from 3rd party sources. I do not see any major prizes. You assert he meets the standards of being regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors, or is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique, but I se no such evidence in the article. DGG ( talk ) 07:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Edd Ashe

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edd Ashe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:41, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Leslie Stowe (actor) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Leslie Stowe (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crotalaria rotundifolia has been accepted

Crotalaria rotundifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:C. H. Lindsley concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:C. H. Lindsley, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lenny Mendonca (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CodeLyoko was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
no changes to establish notability since last decline
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CodeLyokotalk 01:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CodeLyokotalk 01:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annedal has been accepted

Annedal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 04:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Portage Falls has been accepted

Portage Falls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 19:34, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Calvin Graves concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Calvin Graves, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Now in article space. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Walton Sipley has been accepted

Louis Walton Sipley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Warm Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 08:29, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ethel Burton has been accepted

Ethel Burton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 11:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Albert Reamer

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Albert Reamer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:44, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Percy Challenger

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Percy Challenger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Paul E. Walden

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paul E. Walden".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:15, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heinsenia has been accepted

Heinsenia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 16:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heinsia has been accepted

Heinsia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 17:10, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Achu soup has been accepted

Achu soup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lopes Trovão (December 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Snowycats (talk) 03:25, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:The Lily of Poverty Flat concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Lily of Poverty Flat, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Life Sciences Secondary School

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Life Sciences Secondary School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:17, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rand, Avery & Company has been accepted

Rand, Avery & Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wells Moses Sawyer has been accepted

Wells Moses Sawyer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hapsburg Liebe

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hapsburg Liebe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Norval MacGregor (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:46, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ceelle Burke concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ceelle Burke, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cyrus J. Williams (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The citations are mere mentions, often only a sentence or two. I don't think WP:GNG reaches this low.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Chris Troutman (talk) 03:11, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katharine MacGregor has been accepted

Katharine MacGregor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 10:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Rose has been accepted

Walter Rose, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:02, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank G. Edwards House has been accepted

Frank G. Edwards House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

<RetroCraft314 /> 16:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FloridaArmy

Thank you for creating Frank G. Edwards House.

User:Blythwood, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

In source 1 the template didn't include a refnum parameter, so it didn't link to anything. I've fixed this.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Blythwood}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Blythwood (talk) 17:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

  • Ah, just checked the history and that was another editor's addition–not your fault! Still, it's good to add a source to the NRHP website rather than third-party websites, as that's the authoritative source proving the site's notability. Blythwood (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Haunted Manor (December 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Etothepi was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
eπ/💬 22:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Clugston has been accepted

Robert Clugston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:51, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Archer Frost has been accepted

Walter Archer Frost, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Madge Kirby has been accepted

Madge Kirby, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

                                                 Happy holidays

Happy New Year!
FloridaArmy,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

   – 2020 is a leap year – news article.
   – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

– North America1000 20:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)


Draft:F. Harmon Weight concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:F. Harmon Weight, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Merged. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:31, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George V. Hobart (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You know that we require sources, and more context than this. This would've been CSD'd if I found it in mainspace.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:40, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Shocking. You should exercise better judgment. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
I was a little shocked myself, seeing an unsourced draft written by you submitted for review. -- I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:02, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Middleton (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources lack any significant mention of Edwin.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses (My talk page) (My edits) @ 03:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
I've resubmitted. He clearly meets WP:ARTIST and WP:AUTHOR. Not to– mention general notability guidelines.FloridaArmy (talk) 04:05, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Middleton (January 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by I dream of horses was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Resubmitted without change.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George V. Hobart (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No significant mention in the sources provided.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
I resubmitted per my comment above in reply to your notice. You seem to be a little out of your depth. No offense. FloridaArmy (talk) 04:18, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Middleton (January 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CaptainEek was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The additional source does not provide significant coverage. This person does not appear to be notable. Unless you can find such coverage, please stop submitting.
Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 01:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rafael Parra (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Zulia. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This isn't clear when he was president and for how long. According to the Zulia article, there was a Maracaibo Province (Venezuela), then 1864 Maracaibo State, then Sovereign State of Zulia, then 1874 Zulia State. The information could be merged into Zulia during that period and doesn't need a separate article until it is substantial and has enough on its own.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:35, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernardo Tinedo Belasco (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
No mention of subject in reference. Given that article consists of only a single sentence, it would be more appropriate to add it to Zulia article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 03:08, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
What an absolutely ridiculous and bigoted suggestion. Are you going to merge all the articles on governors of Oregon into the article on Oregon? He is noted on several pages in the cited source. Look again. Resubmitting. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bernardo Tinedo Belasco (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Newly added reference does not mention subject (it has a passing mention of a Bernardo Tinedo Velasco), second new reference has no mention of subject (the message even says 'Your search - Bernardo Tinedo Belasco zulia - did not match any documents.') - translation NO MENTION OF SUBJECT.)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 03:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FloridaArmy/Archive_22&oldid=1145988873"