User talk:Flummi35

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Flummi35! I am Joyson Noel and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Joyson Noel ^{Holla at me!} 12:56, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Warwick[edit]

Hi Flummi35, I commented on your edit summary, see here. Your welcome to comment. -- Mdd (talk) 22:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just closed your report at the edit warring noticeboard. While your diligence in promoting a collaborative editing atmosphere is appreciated, I do not think that administrative intervention is called for at this time. This dispute looks like it will be amenable to normal discussion at Talk:Kevin Warwick; please remember that the burden of evidence lies with the editors wishing to add material, particularly in cases of living persons. You may be interested in the advice at WP:Dispute resolution for attracting additional eyes to an article. Please also remember to notify the editor concerned whenever you request review of another editor's edits; AN3 has a bot to take care of it now, but it is sometimes slow and a more personal note can aid in defusing a tense situation. Additionally, while I hope that both you and Bradka continue to enjoy editing here long enough to be regarded as veteran editors, specific evidence of awareness of the 3RR policy is still required. - 2/0 (cont.) 17:11, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am puzzled why you think that I did not notify Bradka when you posted on Bradka's talk page immediately below my notification? If I hadn't mistakenly posted my notification on the Article talk page at first, my notification would have arrived at Bradka's talk page before the automated notice, instead of a minute afterward. It's too bad you've semi-protected the talk page. The IP's were not sockpuppets nor "meatpuppets". Perhaps editing of WP should be restricted to registered editors but until that change is made and the motto is "the encyclopedia anyone can edit", then IPs should not be discriminated against. This has been a disappointing experience. Already I have invested several hours of my time in defending what should be an uncontroversial edit. Doing as you suggest would multiply that time investment, with no clear outcome in sight. There is something wrong with Wikipedia when a small clique of people can effectively block improvements. I will have to reconsider my continued participation on this website. Flummi35 (talk) 17:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the "burden of evidence" has already been met. All it takes to verify is a click on the link to the reference (a lengthy statement that contains even stronger criticism of Warwick than the short excerpt that's been disputed). Nor do I understand the admonition to follow 3RR policy. I made only a single revert, Bradka made four; I've been reading Wikipedia's admin noticeboards long enough to know that editors have been blocked, or at least warned, for less. Flummi35 (talk) 17:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]