User talk:FlyingSimurgh

FlyingSimurgh, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi FlyingSimurgh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nawab Sayyid Hussain Ali Khan Barha (March 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mgbo120 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:BIO. Try adding more references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nawab Sayyid Hussain Ali Khan Barha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nawab Sayyid Hussain Ali Khan Barha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 18:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, FlyingSimurgh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes. You may have problems writing in English, though. Did you know there are Wikipedias in over 300 languages? You may like to help at a Wikipedia in your language instead. Anyway, welcome to the project, and thank you for your changes! If you need help, you can notify me on my talk page, or you can also visit the Teahouse. Masum Reza^📞 17:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, FlyingSimurgh, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

FlyingSimurgh, good luck, and have fun. Masum Reza^📞 17:20, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caste[edit]

Caste on Wikipedia is a horrendous area, don't think too harshly of those who may have thought too harshly about you.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:35, 30 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks Rich, and your right, I shouldn't have let it get to me the way it did.
Thanks a bunch :)

Reliable sources[edit]

Please don't use indianrajputs.com as a source - it is not a reliable source by Wikipedia standards. Have a look at WP:HISTRS. utcursch | talk 13:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't add unsourced content. Assertions such as this one (Magna est veritas et praevalebit being the motto of Banganapalle) need good sources. utcursch | talk 14:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I didn't add a source because I didn't fully realise that the Infobox also needed citations, anyway i'll add it right now. Also I won't be doing any caste related stuff so I won't really be using Indian rajputs. Thanks -flyingsimurgh

Disambiguation link notification for July 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rampur State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rampur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nawab Sayyid Hussain Ali Khan Barha has been accepted[edit]

Nawab Sayyid Hussain Ali Khan Barha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qusai ibn Kilab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ishmaelite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qusai ibn Kilab, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Imperial, Royal and House of Jamalullail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Imperial, royal and noble ranks, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thakur and Mian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Ark[edit]

Royal Ark is not a reliable source (see WP:RSP). I think you should have seen an edit filter warning, did you see it or is the filter broken? Thanks, Guy (help! - typo?) 21:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw a warning but I didn't realise it was for Royal Ark. Won't happen again. Guy -flyingsimurgh

October 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Boing! said Zebedee. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sayyid, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:35, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also add that Wikipedia does not judge what should or should not be noted, we just state the facts as supported by reliable sources. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:36, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sutyarashi (talk) 08:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's not a single evidence that Barha dynasty, Sayyid dynasty and Rohilla dynasty are interrelated in any way. Their origins are well covered on their respective pages, so don't push your POV there and don't do WP:OR. Sutyarashi (talk) 08:46, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]