User talk:Four of Sixteen

The account "Aliens Probes" is terminated due to a fatal bug.

April 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 05:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Four of Sixteen, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Aliens' Probes (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 08:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unfriendly Aliens. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 14:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock....[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Four of Sixteen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am NO troll. I was trying to join Wikipedia, and I DO have a few things for this encyclopedia, which I was planning to add later, such as a book source by Richard Dolan, which talks about UFO, aliens, incl. a new one called a MANTIS, some kind of insectoid alien, and one by a alleged remote viewer who has done this on different aliens, both featured on the likes of Coast To Coast AM and/ or on Jeff Rense's radio show. The former has more aliens in it. The former is Alien Agendas, written by Richard Dolan, ISBN 9798557741590. It discusses the agendas of some of the well known aliens, and not so well known aliens, like the Mantis aliens, and states that ONE of these alien types really mean ill towards the human race. The other book is Cosmic Voyage, written by a Courtney Brown, PH.D., ISBN 0-525-94098-7. This guy was or is some kind of remote viewer.Four of Sixteen (talk) 06:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have unblocked your account. Sorry that I misunderstood the situation but please be aware that when someone's first edit is at WP:ANI (diff) it can look unsuitable. Please do not write in capital letters. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 06:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I DO have two book sources about Remote viewing and a appearant NEW alien mentioned above. The thing is a Mantis alien, some kind of insectoid alien.Four of Sixteen (talk) 06:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)}} Four of Sixteen (talk) 06:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You might like to reply here if you want to ask a question or ask at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 06:45, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Mantis Alien looks like the [Praying mantis|Mantis] shown here, only it is depicted in the book as wearing the same thing worn by the Jedi in certain Star Wars movies as reported by [Alien abduction|abductees] while they are on the ship,base, their own home. Four of Sixteen (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be heading to the UFO article on this one to place these as sources there. ❤️💋 Four of Sixteen (talk) 08:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old account[edit]

The old Account Aliens' Probes is Terminated, no longer in use. Announcement is on User page as well. A bug 🐛 killed it. Four of Sixteen (talk) 09:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome, Four of Sixteen![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Four of Sixteen! I'm Ozzie10aaaa, and I've been assigned as your mentor. About half of new Wikipedia accounts receive a mentor chosen randomly from a list of volunteers. It just means I'm here to help with anything you need! We need to have all kinds of people working together to create an online encyclopedia, so I'm glad you're here. Over time, you will figure out what you enjoy doing the most on Wikipedia.

You might have noticed that you have access to a tutorial and suggested edits. It's recommended that you take advantage of this, as it'll make learning how to edit Wikipedia easier.

If you need assistance with anything or have any questions, click on the "Get editing help" button on the bottom right corner of your screen. This will open up a module with links to help pages and a place to ask me questions. You can also ask me questions directly on my talk page, or go here to get help from the wider community.

Again, welcome to Wikipedia!--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Unfriendly Aliens per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unfriendly Aliens. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Four of Sixteen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not a Sock. I have told everyone here that I am NOT some kind of sock puppet. I just got back from watching the solar eclipse,and find this mess on here. I have had some kind of BUG on here that caused me to get LOGGED OUT each and every time I tried to log in here. Maybe the bug was on my phone, maybe it IS on here. I have tried to get help with this matter, only to be called a Troll on here, which I have PROVEN that I am NO troll at all. Then I tried to contribute here, only to find out that this sock mess is now here.Is this some kind of retaliation - Attack this new Wikipedian as a troll, that failed, let's try SOCK, maybe that will get rid of him. It sure looks like it here. IF my contribs were really examined, the bug report will be found to WP:AN and I have disclosed the FACT that that old account has been not only revealed, but stated that it was and will be no longer in use. The reason for the boldface format is that some phone and computer screens may not be working properly. I have contributed two BOOK sources on here, one to a alien article about a NEW kind of alien reported by Alien Abductees, which looks like a Praying Mantis, wearing a Jedi-like robe. Now, how do I get the FACT across that I am NOT some kind of Sock Puppet?

As stated, this appears to be retaliation for the failed Troll block that was proven UNJUSTIFIED, and for reporting a technical issue that is so bad that I had to switch accounts to properly log in, and duly complied with a request to disclose the results of a malfunction, and as stated, the boldface format is used because the possibility exists in which some phone and computer screens may not be functioning properly at all. ⚠️ Warning to New Wikipedians: There is a bug, possibly on Wikipedia that will throw you out if you try to log in, forcing you to use another account to log in. This is NOT being Trollish at all, unless you are truly being abusive, which I am NOT. I have complied with all regulations on here, such as reporting the bug, what has happened each and every time I have tried to log in with the old account, what I did with it, disclosing and stating that the old account is "Terminated", meaning that it is no longer in use at all. There are others who have these and are, like me, NOT abusive with these things at all.⚠️ Four of Sixteen (talk) 21:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns raised in the SPI. I know of no "bug" that operates as you describe and have no idea what "bad IP" means. Sounds like a defect on your end, not with Wikipedia itself. 331dot (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Four of Sixteen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Who or What is a SPI? MY screen has shown, each time I tried to log in as Invalid Password and/or Invalid Username and I had to re-enter each every time, then says the SAME DAMN THING each time repeatedly. I am getting too old for being a sock, a troll, other bullshit. Just trying to be a Wikipedian on here. I come from a generation that has seen things that would give Stephen King and Clive Barker, Wes Craven literally heart attacks. As stated, I am too old to be some kind of Troll, Sock, other horseshit on here. Four of Sixteen (talk) 22:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is ridiculous. You're on the same IP address as Unfriendly Aliens. We're not going to waste any more time on this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:23, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment: I don't know if I'm allowed to comment on others' unblock requests, but I just want to say that if your first edit here as a "new user" is at WP:ANI trying to prove that you're not a sock, there's definitely something going on.

Your suspicion is unfounded. Every time I have tried to log in, this happens: Invalid Password and/or Invalid Username appears. I input the CORRECT information, only that Invalid Password and/or Invalid Username shows up REPEATEDLY. This is what got reported to WP:ANI. Went there as of the timestamp, found the reported inquiry missing. Do NOT know if it got archived or not. They NEED WP:ANI-TECH to handle things like this. Also, Who the hell is Unfriendly Aliens?! Which is more proof that I have a bad IP. Boldface is for emphasis and in case a screen has gone bad.Four of Sixteen (talk) 02:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Try WP:VPT. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 02:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good one. How do I do THAT if I cannot do so because I am prevented from doing so?! No emotional outburst, only logic. No offense. Four of Sixteen (talk) 03:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then don't. Wait for an administrator to review your request. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 03:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Who the hell is....[edit]

User: Unfriendly Aliens?! Just more proof of a bad IP. Also, where is that mentor at? He said to contact him/ her if I needed anything. Four of Sixteen (talk) 02:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No offense but do you know how IPs work? The reason people make accounts is to not be confused with other people on the same IP.

Your mentor's talk page '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 02:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who or WHAT is a SPI, and how do I address their concerns?! Also unfamiliar with IPs as well. Four of Sixteen (talk) 03:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPI. Your investigation is here. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 03:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seen some concerns over disruptions. Was NOT being disruptive. The other IP talk page discussed a item about guitars. Not musically inclined at at all. IF I was disruptive, I do apologize IF that is the case. Any other concerns?! MY concerns are about a bug that is causing a real mess. If Wikipedia is willing to work with me, I am willing to work with Wikipedia. Richard Dolan is the one who referred to a NEW alien as a Insectoid, a Praying Mantis wearing a Jedi outfit seen by Alien Abductees, and Greys are seen with these things from time to time. The guy was apparently on Coast To Coast AM and on Jeff Rense's radio show. Another multi radio guest was or is some kind of doctor (PH.D.) who has claimed military and govt. connections and can remote view you name it. The ultimate way to spy on a hostile nation, like Russia for example and NOT get caught by their security forces. Will Wikipedia work with me? Four of Sixteen (talk) 03:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, if you continue to make edits like this, Wikipedia will block you instead of working with you. Please take your fringe theories elsewhere. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 04:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was not trying to make a mess of things here. I have copies of their books. I also have family who served in some really - let's say - really sensitive military postings, two serving in two intelligence agencies, one being well known publically. You would not believe WHAT would be discussed at the table at dinner time, even at breakfast time. Does this fit the bill here? I am trying to pay the bill here. Will Wikipedia work with me? Good job here.Four of Sixteen (talk) 04:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's just put it this way: What you have, sockpuppets, got you blocked. What fits the bill is reliable sources, and your edits, such as this one, have failed to provide one. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 04:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seen that edit. I ONLY placed the Insectoid one there, NOT anything like this shit:" | - Frk - BMW BF my man is". WHAT the hell is THAT, and I am being calm about this. What the hell is that about?! Just WHAT is going on here?! I said I was too old for THAT crap early on. Four of Sixteen (talk) 04:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So you're suggesting it wasn't you who made that edit? Who else could have used your account? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 04:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope not. IF I claimed that, things would be even crazier than they are now. I thought I seen it all - until now. Can a account be hacked on here? What are the odds? I heard of ID theft being done by phishing and the like by getting into all kinds of accounts. What are the odds of THAT? I have heard of some really outlandish BS on the news about enemy hackers from hostile nations pulling all kinds of crap. I really hope what you said is NOT the case. Four of Sixteen (talk) 04:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Since you made the edit yourself, you should understand why it was reverted and considered disruptive. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 04:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See "Continuation" below. Four of Sixteen (talk) 05:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to do a separate section header; simply restart the indent. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Continuation....[edit]

...of above, due to shrinking space. As stated I hope no one had done that. Did lose my phone shortly after editing WP. Maybe someone was doing something suspect. Hope not. Maybe I am too trusting. Four of Sixteen (talk) 04:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe you want to deny making that edit, as it was considered disruptive. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I rectify this? As stated, if I was disruptive, I do apologize for that. Also has anyone got a Sock block thrown out, and how can I do so? Four of Sixteen (talk) 05:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To put it simply, it is extremely rare for a sock to be unblocked, and unblocked socks are usually falsely accused, which you are not. See WP:SOCKBLOCK for more information. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also I do have the family I discribed. I am not with them at all. Four of Sixteen (talk) 05:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dinner table conversations are definitely not reliable sources. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, how do I get this block thrown out. I did apologize for any disruptions I made, so what else is needed? Four of Sixteen (talk) 05:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to acknowledge your mistakes in your unblock request and show understanding of the sock policy. Claiming things like a bug led to sockpuppetry will not help your request. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I DID have some serious glitches on my end. Read the sock thing, do admit all non glitch errors. Can you fix this, since it is possible that if I put a unblock request now, I might still get blocked or worse. I am NEW at this. Once unblocked, do I bring everything, including the proverbial kitchen sink to you first? Four of Sixteen (talk) 05:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want me to fix? '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 05:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A unblock template. Got a really weird deal on my user page. Now I have a Homepage, and some really weird things in the home page. Is there something going on here or is my phone finally going off the rails? It says, on my screen: Homepage Userpage Talk. Just got this as of the timestamp here, while the Userpage, on my screen sill says I am blocked. My screen also shows other weird things in it, and I do NOT know how to do a screenshot, even send one. Talk about Old Age. Four of Sixteen (talk) 06:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So to clarify, you want me to fix a unblock template? How am I supposed to do that? You're the one who's blocked. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 06:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying you lost your phone and someone may have gained access to this(or a prior) account? The Homepage is a relatively new innovation, it is not an error. 331dot (talk) 08:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I rectify this? - to be blunt? Spend a few years away from wikipedia and come back when you have some more maturity. There are a massive number of issues with your editing, some of this is due to you deliberately trolling and timewasting to amuse yourself, but a lot of the problems are due to you not understanding what is going on.

The issues you've had include not being able to figure out what is a reliable source, making weird and inappropriate posts to the administrative noticeboards, evading a block placed on your old account, lying (e.g. denying obvious sock puppetry), creating a constant stream of new accounts due to "glitches", making weird comments about/addressed to administrators [1] [2], adding unsourced and poorly written text to articles [3], adding nonsense to articles Frk BMW BF my man v is [4], constantly spamming emojis [5] [6], wasting time at the reference desks with this nonsense [7], using talk pages as discussion forums, incorrectly "fixing errors" [8], attempting to add badly sourced pseudoscience about aliens/bigfoot/cryptozoology into articles and so forth.

Looking at the edits you have made across all the accounts and the IP it is difficult to find an edit you have made that isn't disruptive in some way - most of them have been reverted. You aren't going to be unblocked until you can convince someone that you understand what the issues are and that they won't be repeated in the future. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 10:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@86.23.109.101: I perfectly agree, thanks for your analysis 14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 12:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]