User talk:Fragrant Peony/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dear Fragrant Peony,

I edited sections of the article on the Gatestone Institute due to the extensive and obvious left-wing bias. This bias is very apparent and repetitive in nature, with redundant claims of "falsehoods" and "anti-Muslim", without any reference to actual arguments made by the Institute. These sources were mere journalistic opinions, and the article can not be considered "neutral" by any reasonable person. A number of sections referenced controversial individuals who donated to the Institute, in an effort to defame the Institute without reference to its arguments. I attached articles from the Gatestone Institute itself, to replace the scathing opinions of journalists that took the place of these articles.

I ask that, rather than delete all of my edits without explanation (which took a great deal of time and extensive research), that you return them and ask for an explanation. If my explanation does not suffice, then you can justifiably remove hours of work. I have committed a lot of effort to restoring some neutrality and intellectual integrity to Wikipedia, and the ease with which you can erase extensive contributions, and restore this article to its heavily biased original form, says everything about the current state of Wikipedia.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by HumilityMatters (talk • contribs) 02:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Except that the parts you removed are actually well-sourced within the article. Fragrant Peony (talk) 13:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Those are well-sourced biases, yes. It should be obvious to you how strongly politically biased this article is. And the fact that you refuse to acknowledge that shows your dishonesty and complicity in Wikipedia's political agenda. And it is very telling that you have tried to remove this exchange from your talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.235.96.3 (talk) 19:19, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss it on the Talk Page of the article, and please stop spamming in wrong places. There's a talk page accompanied with the article, go and discuss your edits there and wait for editors' responses. Also, log in to your account and follow Wikipedia instructions. Fragrant Peony (talk) 19:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You directed me to your own talk page for questions, so here I am. And you are the one who removed the content, presumably. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HumilityMatters (talk • contribs) 20:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can't remove huge content without writing an edit summary, and an explanation *within* the page's article. Kindly please look for the instructions on how to edit a Wiki article + provide reliable sources to your edits there. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 12:16, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Even if I bothered to reproduce hours of my work with thorough explanations, your totalitarian, political censorship would delete them all again, instantly. That you've shamelessly refused to return my work, even after I provided explanations that you are unable to refute, says all I need to know. I've saved our exchange as more evidence of Wikipedia's already well-documented, political censorship. It's common knowledge. Even Larry Sanger, the co-founder of Wiki, has denounced it precisely for the behaviors that you "moderators" engage in. Here's a reference:

https://nypost.com/2021/07/16/wikipedia-co-founder-says-site-is-now-propaganda-for-left-leaning-establishment/

You may think you've winning because of your censorship powers, but this will only keep contributing to Wiki's downfall. Totalitarian agendas all eventually fail.

I must say, it has been quite an interesting and informative experience interacting with a representative of the corrupt establishment: a shameless, unscrupulous, and ignorant censor.

Take care. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HumilityMatters (talk • contribs) 02:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Milk[edit]

I explained in the talk section why I removed a certain section, and the top of the wiki page clearly says this page isn't about plant milk, plus, there is nothing in the body of the article that addresses plant milk....and there shouldn't be, because the milk page isn't about plant milk. RomanGrandpa (talk) 22:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A vandal for you![edit]

Still going...

– AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 12:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


AssumeGoodWraith; You made my day, Sir, that's very kind of you 😃. Fragrant Peony (talk) 10:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content[edit]

While you reverted me i was still editing on the page, rewordinh what was written to give it some WP: POV, please i ask you to reconsider that warning you gave me. I'm clearly not here to break the rules--MGK king (talk) 11:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly please when you remove a big content, write in the summary of *that* specific edit your reasons. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 11:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
Please be more explicit in your words. What rule am I breaking? I'm not asking you to break the rules. I wrote a text, I brought the necessary sources to my remarks. I brought you 4 sources what more do you want ?
Therefore, I do not understand what more you expect from me? You delete part of my text without explaining to me why, please be educational because otherwise I will not be able to understand it.
Also, I don't know how else can I say the fact that ululation is used in weddings, and funerals by Berber women.
Maybe there is a misunderstanding, let's try to solve it, please.
Cordially, Sherifianhdr (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Baju Melayu[edit]

Well, I will explain why i put Baju Melayu from Malaysia,earliest text that mentioned Baju Melayu was Sulalatus Salatin aka Malay Annals, and Baju Melayu was founded by Tun Hassan Temenggong in Malacca.Today Malacca part of Malaysia Angkokiak (talk) 05:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please include a short explanation in the edit summary as to why you are removing well-sourced content. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 07:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, I really appreciate it. Fragrant Peony (talk) 11:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hesham Nazeh[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hesham Nazeh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Favre1fan93; I followed your instructions and also added several English language sources. Thank you. Fragrant Peony (talk) 22:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chevalier de Folard[edit]

I've no idea why this update was tagged as "Unconstructive"; its a massive improvement on the original. Robinvp11 (talk) 11:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Kaboo moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, DJ Kaboo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 10:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Thanks a lot! Fragrant Peony (talk) 09:50, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Kaboo (April 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We cannot accept the claim that he's "considered to be Cairo's number one R&B and Hip-Hop Dj" when it's sourced to his own YouTube channel.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 21:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Fragrant Peony! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 21:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Kaboo (April 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fragrant_Peony/Archive_2&oldid=1086279647"