User talk:France a
|
It is suspected that this user has used one or more accounts abusively. The abuse of multiple accounts is prohibited; using new accounts to evade blocks or bans results in the block or ban being extended. See block log and lists of suspected and confirmed accounts. |
The article The time before time has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Also see Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. NawlinWiki 13:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Testing[edit]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Daleks in Manhattan on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Rambutan (talk) 12:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rambutan (talk) 12:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
What the heck is this? Herostratus 14:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
what do u mean 'What the heck is this?'--France a 12:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
April 2007[edit]
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Gridlock (Doctor Who). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 10:10, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- As you appear to be a persistent vandal, this is your final warning. You'll be blocked if you continue abusing Wikipedia. --Tony Sidaway 13:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to many articles, you will be blocked from editing. --Rambutan (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- but why?--mr saxon is the master 11:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Because you have vandalized several pages, despite being warned to stop. · AndonicO Talk 12:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- the pages i have updated are for the better, i could vandalise if i wanted to but i am a trustworthy citezen of the u.k--mr saxon is the master 09:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
tell you what, can i organise a totally impartial 'wikicourt'--mr saxon is the master 14:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, that's not how we work. The pages you updated were not for the better, they were much worse. The fact that you're a British citizen has no bearing on the matter.--Rambutan (talk) 15:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
then how do you explain some of the 'wikicourts' that are dotted around? also the stories i deleted the spoilers fromwere finished within a week or so--mr saxon is the master 14:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- helloooooooo? anyone there???--mr saxon is the master 17:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
There is no such thing as a Wikicourt - if you can find an example, link to it, and then we'll consider letting you get an impartial one. What you did was vandalism because you were asked to stop by a lot of people, and you continued. Even if you think it was right, nobody else did.--Rambutan (talk) 19:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- consider isnt enough --mr saxon is the master 14:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Tough. It isn't your choice. There is no such thing as a Wikicourt. If you can find an illicit one, then that's a problem with it, rather than an absence of problem with you.--Rambutan (talk) 14:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)