User talk:Fumitol/Archive/2010

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Christmas Card

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png
Merry Christmas
At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96(talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
File:Green and Yellow Present.gif

Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II on the PC

The reliable source is here. And on Wookieepedia they tell that the PC version will be developed by Aspyr. 84.86.199.99 (talk) 14:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Spoken Version of the Apple Inc. article

Hey are you still recording a spoken version of the Apple Inc article or have you abandoned that? Just asking. Usb10Connected? 23:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

O ok —Preceding unsigned comment added byIntimidation90 (talkcontribs) 01:19, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


Erik Estavillo

Well if you read the gamepro article http://www.gamepro.com/article/news/214755/litigious-gamer-is-at-it-again/ , you will then realise I'm not attacking, but promising a trial and lawsuit against wikipedia. The complaint itself is in the link provided, read the part in the complaint about wikipedia being sued, understand it, then get a lawyer.

And if I were you, I'd let other moderators know about it. —Precedingunsigned comment added by ErikEstavillo (talkcontribs) 16:41, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunatly, you were attacking Wikipedia by telling the Wikimedia Foundation to get a lawyer. If you have a greivence against the Wikimedia Foundation, you may send them a letter by post using the following address:


Wikimedia Foundation Inc.
149 New Montgomery Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
USA

Thank you--Fumitol (talk) 16:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you too

You have thanked me on my talk page. Thanks for the thanks: it's good to receive appreciation. Also thanks for your work. I did slightly wonder what in particular prompted your thanks. JamesBWatson(talk) 08:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Whenever I am out reversing vandalism, you and Tommy are always out there as well, helping along and offering advice to new editors. That, to me, makes a good user. --Fumitol (talk) 11:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Source FM

The article I wrote on Source FM was a candidate for speedy deletion almost as soon as it was created. I'm very new to wikipedia, so am unsure why this is. If you could give me some info on that it would be much apprecaited. -sourcefm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sourcefm (talkcontribs) 12:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I tagged it for a speedy deletion, due to there not really being any significance about this radio station. One thing that you may want to utilize is the Sandbox, that way you can learn about creating a great article (Of which I am sure is in you!) and then create a real live article that others can read and enjoy. Happy Editing! =)--Fumitol (talk) 12:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey Futimol. JohnCD deleted the article a couple of hours ago so I'm also talking to him. We reach about 40,000 potential listeners and have an average of about 5,000 listeners at any one time. We've been going for nearly two years now. I don't want to sound big-headed but I just want to make you aware of what's going on and whether or not that corresponds to Wikipedia's idea of an important organization. Let me know if that's enough to count it as one. —Precedingunsigned comment added by Sourcefm (talkcontribs) 12:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi again! I do see that the article was deleted. You would need to be a notable radio station. Read WP:Notability. Also, I see that your user name is Sourcefm. Unfortunatly, you creating a page of the same name or editing any page that has to do with you personally falls under WP:Conflict Happy Editing! --Fumitol (talk) 12:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
I have blocked this account, because company names are not permitted as usernames, explained that they can set up a new account, but explained WP:N and pointed them to WP:COI and WP:BFAQ. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Help

I don’t understand how to use wiki image policy; can you upload the two picture One of Tommy Lucchese and the other Matthew Madonna

  • Tommy Lucchese image

http://www.biography.com/notorious/images/crime_files/tommy_lucchese.jpg

It could be free its found on these other sites 

http://www.biography.com/images/database_images/lucchese_Tommy_130x171.jpg

http://www.biography.com/notorious/crimefiles.do?action=view&catName=Gangsters&profileId=328680

  • Matthew Madonna

http://af11.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/matthew-madonna.jpg

It could be free its here http://af11.wordpress.com/2009/09/30/department-of-buildings-bribe-scheme-may-net-mafia-bigs/

Or is the image against the image copyright rules of Wiki

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeyBR(talkcontribs) 20:50, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi there! Unfortunately those images are still linked to their content owners and cannot be deemed as being a free image to use on Wikipedia. - Fumitol (talk) 21:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeyBR(talkcontribs) 21:57, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Apologies

my apologies. - 81.155.7.71 Talk


Talkback

Hello, Fumitol. You have new messages at Koman90's talk page.
Message added 17:02, 3 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Koman90 (talk), Network+(Verify) 17:02, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Replied to Users Page


Your rollback request

Hello Fumitol, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 22:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank You Acalamari!--Fumitol (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
You're welcome! Acalamari 23:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

ACC

I requested access to the ACC Account Creation Interface.--Fumitol (talk) 03:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Reverting my edit to Larry & Steve

Sorry I'm not an expert at Wikipedia. But the statement that Larry & Steve is similar to Family Guy is false and you would know that if you have seen it. I explained this a little in the discussion page. The other information I added all shows The Life of Larry's relation to Family Guy which is exactly what the section is for.76.175.186.16(talk) 19:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I apologize. I apparently had not had my cup of coffee for the day or something. I see now that you are correct. :)--Fumitol (talk) 09:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

igloo

I have added you to the igloo whitelist. If you now try to use the program, you should find that it allows you to connect.Ale_Jrbtalk 09:21, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank You Ale_Jrb! --Fumitol(talk) 20:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
No problem. :) Ale_Jrbtalk 22:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

hi

Hi,

I am interested in reverting vandalistic edits. Can you let me know how to search for pages that are frequently being vandalised ?

Thx Cosmos 09:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia :) One way to find those pages is just to look under the 'recent changes' tab to the left of your screen. Thats where I started :D Click 'diff' and see if that article was vandalized or not. The quickest tool to use is a project calledTwinkle. Just read up on how to use it! Also, dont forget to sign all of your posts with this at the end--~~~~

--Fumitol (talk) 04:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


reverting edits

hey can u help me with this

a) if there is a article with 2 successive vandalistic edits then how to revert it to the oldest edit

  for example article xyz has been vandalised at 4pm, 3pm and the last safe edit was at 2pm .how to undo the changes to 2pm version ?
 if i select "undo", the article is reverted from 4pm to 3pm but not to 2pm 

b) how to send warnings to users who persistently vandalize pages ?.

thx,

Cosmos 08:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Hemorrhoids

I suck at wikipedia so I'll go ahead and put this here. You are incredibly condescending and I suspect lack a coherent sense of humor. Carry on, Fumitol. You sound like a prescription drug for people with hemorrhoids or something.--Tru3f4ct

Thank you for your comment. Brightened up an otherwise crappy day. :)--Fumitol (talk) 01:39, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi from fellow anti-vandalism wikipedian

Hi I noticed you fighting vandalism and that you use Huggle. Could you tell me how many edits I need to get rollback rights? Just an approx. number? Thanks.Adrenalin 150% (talk) 03:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Deagle AP! I hope that you are doing well this evening. I requested rollback rights at 390 edits, and was granted them, mostly due to about 300 of those edits of me going into "Recent Changes" and editing right there. Took a loooong time. I believe that the standard is 500 edits though. I see that you have 147 edits right now. I would suggest keep doing what you are doing and then read this page and request roll back rights here! If there is anything else, i'll be happy to find the answer for you! Have a great day!--Fumitol (talk) 03:09, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey thanks for your help Fumitol and also for your advice. I'd like to give you this for your efforts to place on your user page. Thanks. Deagle_AP (talk) 14:01, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
FTAThis user is persistent in the fight against vandalism. Hence, the user has been entrusted with membership into Wikipedia's Fire Team Alpha.

BFMV edit

Hahaha, okay you got me. I still have a screen cap though. It was fun while it lasted. 174.116.202.242(talk) 12:48, 25 April 2010 (EST)

Greg Gibson

Hi there - I'm confused as to why you thought my edits to Greg_Gibson were vandalism. I removed things like "one of the worst calls in MLB history" "Greg Gibson sucks". The bulk of what I edited was just added by an angry KC Royals fan. I tried to at least make it less subjective and more informative. The dude quoted comments from a newspaper article for christs sake.

Replied to Users Page.--Fumitol (talk) 06:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! Glad there are people like you keeping this place clean. Dflaw
Replied to Users Talk Page 76.17.145.144--Fumitol (talk) 06:10, 25 April 2010 (UTC)