User talk:Funkybassuk

Image:Joey Ansah.jpg[edit]

You're likely to lose Image:Joey Ansah.jpg for multiple reasons:

Image source is vague (1) no URL source and (2) "It appears...". Source should be certain, specific and name copyright owner.
Image resolution is too good.
Living person fair use image irreplacable standard for is tougher.
Poor or missing license choice.

Review the following:

Options to fix the issues:

Locate a free image: Wikipedia:Image use policy#Adding images which may include a suitable license from the copyright holder.
Locate a non-free promotional image Template:Non-free promotional and provide fair use rationale Template:Non-free use rationale.

I suggest carrying on with current attempt and see how it plays out. If this one is deleted we can try again with one of the above options. Conrad T. Pino 05:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Joey Ansah.jpg deleted[edit]

The delete happened 19:06, August 23, 2007 for "Bad justification given for fair use". Want to try again with a different approach? Conrad T. Pino 04:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Foolish Earthlings[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Foolish Earthlings, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 01:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]