User talk:Fuzzyworcester

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Fuzzyworcester, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  hydnjo talk 04:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Porsche 911[edit]

Hi Roy

Thanks for the reply. Please let me know if you need any help with this page - I don't have time to spend too long writing stuff, but am happy to contribute. I do urge you to remove the MkI and MkII references, though, because they are confusing.

Cheers

Phil Philsy 19:33, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, thanks for your message and sorry for the delay in replying. I agree that the 964 Turbo never came with 4 wheel drive and i'm not even sure why i mentioned that! 4wd first appeared on a 911 Turbo with the Turbo version of the 993 in 1995. I've only mentioned Mk 1 and Mk 2 in that context because historically there have only ever been 2 generations of 911 (1963-1997 and 1997-present) despite each generation being continually updated, and often featuring different code names with each revision. Your comments have been noted and understood though.

Cheers

Roy (Fuzzyworcester) 17th April 2006.

Hi, I put a note on the 911 page, but I've since found I'm meant to contact you via your Talk page, so here I am!

I'm interested that you've reintroduced some errors I've corrected on this article. The terms Mk1 and Mk2 should not be used in relation to the air-cooled and water-cooled 911 in the way you suggest. Also, the 964 Turbo was not offered with four-wheel-drive. I'm as keen as you are to make this article accurate, but don't want us to be wasting each other's time. Feel free to contact me directly to discuss - I have a detailed knowledge of the 911 but don't have a lot of time to spend putting stuff onto Wikipedia, but I'm happy to help ensure what is on there is correct.

Cheers

Phil Philsy 08:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, i see you've been adding detailed info about the 996 and 997 variants of the Porsche 911. I'd like to encourage you to use the existing Porsche 996 and Porsche 997 pages for the detailed stuff, since it is making the 911 page unwieldy. There are already "Main article xxx" links, so people should have no trouble finding those pages. They have material in them already, so it will be necessary to merge your material in with what's already there.

all the best,

Hotlorp 05:09, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ford_Escort_Mk_IV_-_1992_facelift.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Escort_Mk_IV_-_1992_facelift.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:04, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Ford_Escort_Mk_IV_(1995_facelift).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Escort_Mk_IV_(1995_facelift).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 16:39, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Ford_Escort_Mk_IV_-_(1992_facelift).JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Escort_Mk_IV_-_(1992_facelift).JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ford_Focus_Mk2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Focus_Mk2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Ford_Escort_Mk_IV_-_(1992_facelift).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Escort_Mk_IV_-_(1992_facelift).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 08:57, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Ae_Ford_Focus_ST170_691_08.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ae_Ford_Focus_ST170_691_08.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:3-5.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:3-5.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. bluemask 11:56, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Ford_Focus_SVT.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Focus_SVT.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 09:50, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Golf GTi Mk V.jpg[edit]

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Golf GTi Mk V.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:30, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Peugeot 307 sw 2005 1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Peugeot 307 sw 2005 1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 16:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads[edit]

Do not upload images with false license information. If you do not know what the copyright status of an image is do not upload it. As the upload page says most images found around the internet is copyrighted and not apropriate for uploading to the Wikipedia, claiming images to be public domain without any kind of proof to back it up is just not acceptable. Please be more carefull in the future (repeatedly uploading images with false info will get you blocked), thanks. --Sherool (talk) 16:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed 7 generic warnings already-deleted below this point in order to connect the following message to the preceding one ×Meegs 12:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning[edit]

You have continued to upload images and falsely claiming that they are in the public domain. If you continue this, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also, be advised that the following images are without valid licensing information, and, if they remain that way, will be deleted in seven days:

Please correct the tags on the images if you believe any of them are legally usable on WIkipedia. Also, before uploading any more images please read and make sure that you understand the following pages:

  1. Wikipedia:Image use policy
  2. Wikipedia:Image copyright tags
  3. Wikipedia:Public domain

If you have any questions, you can as at Wikipedia:Image legality questions. Regards. ×Meegs 12:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours. It will take you at least that long to study Wikipedia's copyright and image-use policies provided in the links about. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Image legality questions. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Future misrepresentation of image legal status will result in significantly longer blocks, however. ×Meegs 10:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ford_Focus_Mk_1_RS_interior.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Focus_Mk_1_RS_interior.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:40, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ford_Focus_Mk_1_saloon_2004_(rear).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Focus_Mk_1_saloon_2004_(rear).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ford_Focus_Mk_2_ST_interior.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Focus_Mk_2_ST_interior.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:47, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ford_Focus_Mk_2_interior.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_Focus_Mk_2_interior.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Sports Car Racing[edit]

Due to your involvement in some Wiki pages that regard sports car racing of some sort, I would like to ask for you to look into the proposed WikiProject for Sports Car Racing. Any help you may have to offer to the project will be greatly appreciated. The359 03:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Porsche 997 Turbo.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Porsche 997 Turbo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2006 Porsche 911 GT3.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2006 Porsche 911 GT3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 20:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Worcester article improvements[edit]

Good work on the Worcester article - you've added a great amount of content there. violet/riga (t) 17:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the comments. Being a resident of Worcester all my life helps, and i thought the article on Worcester could do with updating and expanding. I'll add more relevant stuff as when i can. Cheers.

Midland Red Omnibus Company Limited[edit]

Hi, I saw the page you created, and have converted it into a redirect page, which I believe was your intention in creating it in the first place. For information on how to do this yourself see WP:R. Mjroots (talk) 13:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All you need to do is type #REDIRECT before the link to the redirection page destination! Mjroots (talk) 13:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image copyright problem with Image:Midredw165exngtherefd85.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Midredw165exngtherefd85.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worcester[edit]


Worcester[edit]

Hi Fuzzyworcester! an article you have contributed to, has been selected for the Wikipedia Version 0.8. offline release on DVD and iPhone. If you would like to make any last minutes changes or improvements, you are most welcome to do so. Deadline is midnight UTC on Monday, 11 October. See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire/Archive 1#Worcestershire articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release.--Kudpung (talk) 04:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Woosh[edit]

The article Woosh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable local bus routes. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTTRAVEL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 20:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Egdon[edit]

A tag has been placed on Egdon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

no reason given

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ramesh Ramaiah (talk) 14:40, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Egdon[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Egdon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GrayFullbuster (talk) 14:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rover 200 / 25, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CRX (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Fuzzyworcester. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Fuzzyworcester. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Newsletter WikiProject Worcestershire[edit]

Worcestershire - one of England's oldest and still existing (with some minor boundary changes) ceremonial and political shires, famous for its nearly 1000 year old cathedral, the River Severn, the AONB of the Malvern Hills, some of the oldest schools in the country, England's fastest growing university, apples, pears, cider and cricket, and of course its world famous sauce. The Wikiproject is now in need of some attention. Created 12 years ago, this project amassed a huge resource for editors working on all kinds of articles and categories related in some way or another to the county. Kudpung is more or less retired from Wikipedia getting on for 2 years ago and it would be good if a group of editors could get it up to date and continue to maintain it.
Opt out of this message list here.
WikiProject Worcestershire 14:14, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Worcestershire Newsletter - May 2023[edit]

The WORCESTERSHIRE Project Newsletter - May 2023

The WikiProject WORCESTERSHIRE Newsletter
Issue 3 - May 2023
(Archived here.)
This photo of the medieval cloisters in Worcester Cathedral by Diliff appeared as picture of the day on 5 October 2016.


Welcome to the third WikiProject Worcestershire newsletter

and the first one in (checks notes) THIRTEEN years! When I first joined this WikiProject back in December last year, I was slightly tempted to mark it as inactive, as activity had extremely slowed and there had been no new participants in 3 years. But I have decided to revive this project, as Worcestershire means a lot to me and I know it does for so many others. But as many participants of this project have disappeared completely off Wikipedia, this project is now in dire need of attention and it would be helpful if a group of editors could join me and continue to maintain it.
Here goes for the third EXTREMELY irregular news bulletin...

What's happened since last time

Evolution of Worcestershire county boundaries since 1844 was promoted to Good article on 3 September 2014. Largely the work of Bellow558, a Worcestershire Project member, the article was reviewed by Mike Christie.

Hanley Castle High School was was promoted to Good article on 30 August 2012. There are 78 good articles for educational institution of all kinds of which there are 4 GA for secondary schools in the UK. Hanley High School is the first state school in the UK to become GA.

Evesham was nominated on 2 December 2010 as a Good Article Candidate. The nomination unfortunately failed due to unforeseen unavailability of the editors working on the article. It only requires minor attention to be renominated.

Worcester Castle was awarded Good Article status on 27 October 2011. Largely the work of User:Hchc2009 , the article was reviewed and promoted by User:Malleus Fatuorum.

The photo by David Iliff of the medieval cloisters in Worcester Cathedral (pictured above) appeared as picture of the day on 5 October 2016.

Urse d'Abetot was awarded Featured Article status on 13 October 2009. Promoted by Karanacs, the article was 96.4% the work of Ealdgyth. It was finally featured on the main page on 14 April 2018.

The Battle of Powick Bridge was awarded Featured Article status in 2020 and appeared on the Main Page on 12 February 2023.

Worcestershire articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 1 4 6
FL 1 1
GA 4 3 6 13
B 2 5 14 12 33
C 1 5 20 73 2 101
Start 15 51 387 34 487
Stub 1 6 586 19 612
List 3 6 30 39
NA 1 1 23 339 364
Assessed 3 35 102 1,122 339 55 1,656
Unassessed 3 10 13
Total 3 35 102 1,125 339 65 1,669
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 6,636 Ω = 5.30
Experts needed!

If you notice any editors contributing significantly to Worcestershire-related articles, then please ask them to join this WikiProject, as we need all the help we can get.

Would you like to join the WP:WORCS?? Please enter yourself at WP:WORCS! - new editors are always welcome!

Happy Wikying, and thanks to everyone else who has contributed to our articles.

New project resources

Before making any major edits to articles or stubs, please be sure to read the new WP:WORCS/HowTo. Urgent tasks are now listed at: WP:WORCS/ToDo. It should be referred to often, and will be your main stop for most maintenance tasks. We recommend keeping the page on your watchlist.

Priorities are not set in stone and if you would like to discuss changes, please join in at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Worcestershire. The current priorities:

  • Population
    Now that the 2021 census details have been released, most settlement articles need updating. This website: https://www.citypopulation.de/ can be helpful, although you should note this does not collect data from hamlets or small villages.
  • Monitor
    The watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
  • Infoboxes
    Some of our articles need their infoboxes completing.
  • References
    Please remember that the list of stubs needing expansion is always in need of attention. Please take a look and see if you can help. One small edit, such as adding a reference section and reference, to an article each session would make a big difference. If you are uploadiing an image, be sure it has a correct FUR, and that you have preferably already created a link on the page where you want it to be.

These lists will help:

Guidelines
Missing civil parishes

There is a project creating missing civil parish articles in England at User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes. The missing parishes in Worcestershire currently are:

Evesham project

I am currently planning on reforming the Evesham article to get it up to scratch for another GA nomination. If other editors are interested in helping me then please do, especially if you live in Evesham yourself, as the main photo is from 2008 and is out-of-date as there is a new statue in front of the building.

On the newsletter

I intend to write a brand-new newsletter once every two months, though I would like other editors to help me in completing it in case of my unavailability.

Imprint
Written by Ollieisanerd (some sections are same as last time written by Kudpung) • All comments to WT:WORCS
Based on an original concept by WP:YORKS

If you wish to opt-out of future Newsletters, please remove yourself from the Newsletter mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fuzzyworcester&oldid=1152563639"