Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GraziePrego was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Also take out the peacock language. Quoting from her poems is not necessary either.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yael Hacohen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, GH2014!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GraziePrego (talk) 01:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All issues are fixed at your request GH2014 (talk) 10:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
Please remove the inline external links, and convert to inline citations (see WP:REFB / WP:ILC for advice) where relevant.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yael S. Hacohen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Nearly every single source is a WP:PRIMARY one. Could you let me know how you think Yael passes our WP:NAUTHOR criteria?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yael S. Hacohen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hacohen published three books (two poetry in nationally accredited presses and one translation in Israel's most prestigious poetry press), including publishing individual poems in almost every major poetry literary journal. Hacohen is the winner of the Barbara Mandigo Kelly Peace Poetry Award.
Additionally, the sources are major university and literary publications (not primary). GH2014 (talk) 11:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Publishing books does not make an author inherently notable, but the winner of the award might do. I would strip back the references to just the key ones that prove notability. I will go through the references and explain why most are not appropriate:
Does not mention Hacohen.
Does not mention Hacohen.
Does not mention Hacohen.
Does not mention Hacohen.
A student bio, does not prove notability.
A staff bio, does not prove notability.
Is the poem, a primary source, so cannot be used to prove notability.
Written by Hacohen, so cannot be used to prove notability.
Is the poem, a primary source, so cannot be used to prove notability.
404 error.
Is the poem, a primary source, so cannot be used to prove notability.
Is the poem, a primary source, so cannot be used to prove notability.
Award, may go some way to showing notability.
Primary source, so cannot be used to prove notability.
Award, may go some way to showing notability.
Award, may go some way to showing notability.
So we have three good sources that show the award, four sources that do not mention Hacohen at all, a few bios, and a few primary sources. Unfortunately this isn't yet there. Let me know if you have any questions. Qcne(talk) 12:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Uncited sections throughout.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yael Hacohen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
