User talk:GP.Jimmy

Welcome![edit]

Hello, GP.Jimmy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as GayPark, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! gsk 17:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GayPark[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GayPark, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. gsk 17:30, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GayPark for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GayPark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GayPark until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gsk 08:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help?[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hi, what can I do to help? Bjelleklang - talk 09:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GP.Jimmy, for the AfD that started on the article the time is running short. Those discussions usually last a week. You need to find independent reviews and reports about the product to show it's not just the company talking about its own product. It's a way to meet WP:GNG, which all articles must do. Alternatively, if it's just too soon to find those sources or you otherwise want to have more time, you can ask that the entire article to be moved into your user space where you can work on it more, then bring it back out as an article. Sportfan5000 (talk) 09:24, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To give more detail, the test for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability and requires evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:Notability (summary). The test is, have people independent of the subject thought it important or significant enough to write substantial comment about? For a new product, that may not be possible, which means that it is too soon for an article. An encyclopedia is not the place to announce new things

You are evidently connected with GayPark, so you should read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.

If you are the same person as user GayPark.Jimmy (talk · contribs), please choose one account and use only that one, to avoid suspicion of sockpuppetry. JohnCD (talk) 10:35, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]