User talk:GUIB Corrector

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! --Busy Stubber 04:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interac (Japan)[edit]

Thanks for being straight-forward about your being an employee of this company. I can understand why you want to contribute to Interac (Japan). But there's a Wikipedia guideline you should read -- Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. It explains some of the problems that arise when you edit an article about a company you work for. Please read it.

Articles in Wikipedia need published sources that are independent of the topic. In other words, Interac's websites can certainly be used for some of the information in the article, but you also need to use outside sources and references -- newspaper articles, government reports, journal articles, that sort of thing. Some outside sources may be critical of Interac.

Think about working on some other articles in Wikipedia. Do you have a hobby or other interest like that? There are a lot of fascinating articles in Wikipedia that you could help improve!

Nobody here, by the way, is asking you to go away. We're just asking you to do your best to follow the rules.

Respectfully, --Busy Stubber 15:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Thank you for your mentoring. You have avoided any kind of confrontational position that you could have taken in order to teach and for that I am grateful. --GUIB Corrector 07:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Interac (Japan)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Interac (Japan), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interac (Japan). Thank you. J 03:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk-page use[edit]

In the toolbar at the top of each talk-page is a button or pulldown with a link marked "new item" or something like that. Clicking it starts a new section where you can start a discussion on a new topic, rather than adding content to existing discussion blocks on other topics. Each article also has an associated talk-page (there's a "Talk" link in the toolbar for it) where you can have a discussion about article content in a place that other editors will more easily be able to see it and contribute as well (rather than just you talking with one other editor on his talkpage). DMacks (talk) 04:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugene Joseph Pelc (February 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Arthistorian1977 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are not enough sources to maintain the notability claim. Also, the article is written in highly promotional tone

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eugene Joseph Pelc and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eugene Joseph Pelc, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GUIB Corrector! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]