User talk:Gagandeep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome! to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello Gagandeep, this is Gurubrahma, and I hope that you are having fun with Wikipedia. First of all, welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that any one can edit! Find something that can be improved, either in content, grammar or formatting, then fix it. Don't be afraid. Be bold!. If you do something wrong, there is always someone who will clean up the mess.

Here are some links that you may find helpful:

Here are also some tips that you might find useful:


India related links[edit]

All the best! Enjoy your stay on Wikipedia!! Gurubrahma 16:25, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011[edit]


Hi Gagandeep,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Sikh-history. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jat people without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SH 15:02, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Jat people. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. If you make changes to an article and those changes are reverted, your next step should be to discuss the problem on the article talk page and not reinstate your changes unless you first get a consensus in agreement with you. To do otherwise, and simply reinstate your changes, is considered edit warrinig and can lead to sanctions. So please, go and discuss your desired changes on the talk page and wait for consensus. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:36, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]