User talk:GeeCee

Sup[edit]

Sup Howdoesthiswo (talk) 02:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Skybridge (Vancouver)[edit]

Thanks for the image, it was much needed. You may want to add your source to the image description, even if it was your own picture. If you don't it may get deleted. Thanks. Zhatt 00:18, August 14, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. I actually used one of the pictures that was linked to by User:154.20.235.123 in Talk:Skybridge_(Vancouver). I'm new to editing on Wikipedia and am unsure where how to credit source in this situation. GeeCee 05:51, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keurboomstrand, Western Cape[edit]

I have rewritten the article so it is about the place a resort in South Africa with a site of archaeological significance nearby. I would be grateful if you could take a look at the rewritten article. Capitalistroadster 19:04, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. I was unsure if it was anymore than an advertisement by an anonymous user. GeeCee 23:34, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anmore ferry[edit]

I've seen it running but I guess that doesn't count for much. I haven't see it recenty thouh, so remove it I guess. That ferry was never a BC ferry or anything, it was just a separate business.

Hey there, I noticed you added text about the village of anmore being warned by translink to fix it's roads, or the bus would stop. The issue is somewhat more complicated than that, but where di you obtain this information? Even if it's not a verifiable source, I was just curious where you heard that rumour. I've never heard it and am well connected with the council. TotallyTempo 21:18, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yeah No problem about the road issue, I won't make you remove it. I'm also moving to anmore on the 21st of April. Right now I'm living in ontario, but before I came here I lived in Anmore for 18 years, and after 8 months here a four month stint afterwards. Great place. One thing you'll find in anmore is that Port Moody is disliked pretty strongly. It started with an annexation attempt of anmore by port moody, then road problems with Anmore that weren't resolved (because anmore connected east rd to a temporary road that port moody built, (that bit with the townhouses on it) , then ioco became a sore point, shortly after it was david avenue, followed by anmore taking port moody to court for being a public nuisance over lights on the new school field. It goes on and on and on. The East Rd. issue is quite complicated, reaching all the way up to the federal government. I could probably explain it to you if you care enough about it. If you have any questions about anmore, or your move there I can certainly tell you most everything, right down to how to get away with parking violations, so feel free to ask if you have any questions. TotallyTempo 00:03, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

I forgot / got distracted to do this earlier, but thanks for the Barnstar. It feels good to know that others feel the same way that I do. I mean, I already knew that - it's an inevitability - but it's good to be reminded of it. Scumbag 17:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

anmore[edit]

Hey I was wondering if you help me with the Anmore page. I've been trying to put the mayors name in the info box, but it doesn't want to work for some reason. I've tried just about everything. Including following the syntax used in the other articles and in the other areas of the info box. Nothing seems to work. If you look on the edit this page you will find the Hal Weinberg (the mayor's name) is actually under the correct space, it just doesn't show up on the page for some reason. Thanks for helping, and see you in Anmore soon. TotallyTempo 01:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver[edit]

		WikiProject Vancouver
		You have been invited to participate in Operation Schadenfreude to restore the article Vancouver back to featured article status.

- Mkdw ^talk 11:50, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Imaxlogowhite.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imaxlogowhite.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, GeeCee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, GeeCee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, GeeCee. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]