User talk:Geek1975

sockpuppet?[edit]

You know, for a new user, you are surprisingly deft with the rather confusing wikipedia interface. Are you somebody's sockpuppet? Sockpuppetry carries severe punishments on wikipedia. If you are , then I will find out.Netaji 10:48, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now what is sockpuppet if I may ask?.User:Geek1975... I am a Ghost from Godhra

Click here Wikipedia:Sock puppet. Please keep facetious remarks out of wikipedia, thanks.Netaji 10:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha Ha Ha... very funny, no I am a new user who picks up things fast. And does not forget past easily.User:Geek1975

Very good. I suggest you watch your tone and not make borderline threats or personal attacks as those carry block penalties. Read the text below for the standard welcome.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Netaji 11:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm, mounting evidence of sockpuppetry from a new user who can browse the dark underbelly of wikipedia so quickly.Netaji 11:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have a trophy for such an achievement at Wiki? U sort of administrator or just another cordial user? --Geek1975 11:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A user, same as you. There are things for you to learn about how wikipedia works I think. I suggest you look at help pages for a while before beginning or you may get swamped. Wikipedia is not as pretty a place as it looks.Netaji 11:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2002 Gujarat violence revision[edit]

Hi Geek1975 -- I see you've started to edit, which is very much appreciated. I want to just ask you to please tone down your edits on the talk page. Please see my proposal at Talk:2002 Gujarat violence#Proposal for informal mediation from Bcorr, and you can indicate your agreement to the proposal -- if you do agree with it. While I am not at all questioning your good faith, I just think it will help the process along.

Thank you again for your participation in this process. Sincerely, BCorr|Брайен 12:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BCorr. If you have noticed my comments have been very civil. But some guys seem to act like big daddies around here, having their own vested pre-concieved notions, stalking the ones who do not adhere to their diktats, don't u think so? --Geek1975 12:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One of the guidelines stated to refrain from characterizing the objectivity of others. Bakaman _Bakatalk 14:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fascist in the real world equals Nazi. Don't play fool.Bakaman _Bakatalk 14:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Distortions and POV nonsense[edit]

Don't put truncated quotes and slanted distortions in the 2002 Gujarat violence/2006 revision article. I am watching you my friend.Netaji 08:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you persist with this kind of edit warring, I'll have to start vandalism warnings.Netaji 10:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your last edits were unacceptable. The whole point of the revision was to report everything concisely. The Sreekumar attack was similar to attacks by other anti-Hindu elements, so no point in needlessly elaborating it. Plus, hrw is clearly an anti-Semitic cabal. Anti-Semitism creates a pattern of psycho-pathology that generates bias in favor of muslims. This bias leaks into their coverage of the Muslim-Hindu riots in India. Thus, their anti-semitism must be mentioned. Otherwise, I could start going to other muslim sites and quoting from neo-nazi websites that support and justify Islamic terrorism on the same grounds as yours (what does their 'anti-Semitism' have to do with coloring their views on Islamic terrorism?Everything, that's what).Netaji 10:56, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism of 2006 Gujarat violence/2006 revision[edit]

You have committed vandalism by putting in garbage that is not there in your cited article. This is your first warning. I will provide two more if you persist, then you will be reported.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Netaji 11:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article you cited DID not say that army participated in riots, only that they did not intervene. Your edit is unsources and POV and I have notified an admins to that effect and he agrees that they are wrong. If you persist then it WILL be vandalism.Netaji 11:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Subash_Bose sockpuppet report[edit]

Nope. You did everything you needed to. --Woohookitty^(meow) 08:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you press the shift button on the keyboard and the Refresh button in your web browser at the same time, it should refresh the page and then give you the options you are looking for. --Woohookitty^(meow) 08:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If that doesn't work, here is the direct link to edit your report. --Woohookitty^(meow) 10:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPA[edit]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. - This is regarding your false 3RR tag and your false accusations of socks.Bakaman _Bakatalk 16:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. - Regarding your rude conduct on WP:ANIBakaman _Bakatalk 17:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Havent seen the comments on ANI but I suppose it would have carried more weight if you reported it to an admin and then put this token of your visit here TerryJ-Ho 17:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your vandalism of my user page, I have closed correspondence with you. Use an intermediary.Bakaman _Bakatalk 23:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you people?[edit]

CiteCop 18:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poking around I see that you've also been targeted by Subhash bose. He's got a real talent for making friends, that one. And why does is his signature different from his username?
CiteCop 22:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Skalia.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Skalia.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Uormain.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Uormain.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)