User talk:Geoguy91

Rudeness[edit]

I find you are VERY unkind and rude to other users, as well as cursing and insulting them with foul language. Please do NOT be so horrid to other Wikipedia users! It is not allowed, and your own record is not clean. I warn you, continue with this and I shall file a complaint about you to Wikipedia, every administrator I can reach, every one of my Wikipedian friends, and every user that sides by me. Continue with your mutinous behavior, and I shall personally make sure you are banned from Wikipedia. Believe me, I started a campaign that barred a User who insulted me from accessing Wikipedia before, and I can do it again to you, if you do not change your ways. And, do NOT curse or insult me if you choose to reply to me, or I shall be very angry indeed. Please stop your behavior, or the consequences shall be most unpleasant. Uioh 20:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on here - I just checked Geoguy91 contribs [1] and unless they are using an IP they haven't done anything since 26th October 2006. You certainly take your time to get wound up !. Please explain why you think Geoguy91 deserves "consequences shall be most unpleasant". I'll also post this on your talk page. Ttiotsw 23:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to interject into this that except for the one incident involving Buffalo Zoo, i have never in any way insulted or inappropriately posted anything on Wikipedia at all. Please inform me of my record which is not clean, as well as my "mutinous behavior". I eagerly await a response. --George The Man 04:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yo, Georgie, I may curse also, but you DID commit vandalism and ya shoul'dnt be mean to others. 'Kay, dude? Khgj 21:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On a separate note, comments like this one are generally not very helpful (though I agree with you that the song is quite bad). As stated at WP:TALK, "talk pages are not a forum for editors to argue their own different points of view". —ShadowHalo 10:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Holy feck guys - that user wrote that at 07:23, 9 February 2006. That's nearly 1 year ago !. Also you have quote mined the WP:TALK as the policy states "Talk pages are not a forum for editors to argue their own different points of view about controversial issues." (my emphasis). Hollaback Girl is not that controversial unless you like your hip-hop mixed by the Disney channel. Ttiotsw 20:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't mean to "mine". Actually, it's complete coincidence that I stumbled here around the same time that others did; the Hollaback Girl article went through a long period of inactivity not long after Geoguy91 left the comment. However, the guideline does not apply solely to controversial issues: "Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views." (Opening paragraph, no accompanying text.) My intention is not to further criticize Geoguy91; Uioh has done that quite effectively. I'm just trying to point out that it's most helpful when users discuss the article and how it can be improved, rather than discussing the article's subject. —ShadowHalo 20:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Cannabis smoking

Hey, I feel kinda lonely here, with no other entries after January 07. Anyway, hope you're feeling better.

Concerning the advice not to try smoking chunks that don't make it through the screen, and your invitation to rewrite it, you might check the article again and you will find that Jaysweet has thrown a fit and erased over half the article-- all references to any non-hot-burning-overdose smoking methods-- and placed advice on how to mix tobacco into the cannabis at the top of the article. (You can look for more discussion on that on user talk pages including mine.)

Anyway--where was I-- the reason for not burning large chunks,

1. They're usually woody stem material, stuff that contains little THC, or some adulterant that got in;

2. To burn them, user has to suck harder, stoke up a higher burning temperature, and destroy more of the THC in the good stuff.

Well one would think readers who followed Google to this article were interested in finding out the right (i.e. safe and advantageous) way to smoke cannabis, but will any further information on the subject get through Jaysweet's buzzsaw?Tokerdesigner (talk) 23:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]