User talk:George45646

prior accounts[edit]

Have you ever used a prior account on Wikipedia? nableezy - 21:04, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in case you not already aware, all articles in the Arab-Israeli conflict area are subject to a 1 revert rule, meaning you may not make more than one revert on any page in any 24 hour period. nableezy - 21:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, George45646! Thank you for your contributions. I am Epeefleche and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Epeefleche (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ariel University Center[edit]

If you continue to remove the tags and misrepresent the citations given I may request that your account be restricted from editing that article. Please do not continue blindly removing valid tags. Thank you. nableezy - 18:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you are logging out to perform reverts you would otherwise be restricted from doing that is abusive sockpuppetry and you may be blocked or banned for doing so. nableezy - 12:57, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not self-revert your change I will be reporting you to arbitration enforcement. nableezy - 15:45, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop all the time threatening George45646 (talk) 16:14, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported to arbitration enforcement. You can see this here. nableezy - 16:34, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Ariel University Center of Samaria[edit]

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block.

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

The complete report of this case is at WP:AE#George45646. EdJohnston (talk) 17:07, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

— EdJohnston (talk) 17:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of David9991 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like it unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. T. Canens (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]