User talk:GeorgeMoney/Archive04

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey George[edit]

I just dropped by to say hi. For some reason my editing thing wont sign anymore? I prefer to use the flag thing you gave me, but its not always possible. Are you an Administrator yet. You were really helpful to me. Can I help to advocate for you to be named an Administrator if you are not yet one. Drop by User:Merlinus My Talk, and let me know will you? File:Peace Sign 2.svg Merlinus (talk)--merlinus 19:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean when you said "For some reason my editing thing wont sign anymore?". Does it mean you can't use your signature? --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 23:00, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, it's too soon for an RfA nom. — nathanrdotcom (T • C • W) 00:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, it is waaaay too soon. I am totally not ready to go through the process of an RFA and to be an admin. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 00:16, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin?[edit]

Did not mean to put you on the spot. I did not know if you had been in Wikipedia 5 months or 5 years. Is it impolite to ask is someone is an Admin or such questions? Reguardless, I could use a little advise from time if you would not mind? --01:31, 3 May 2006 (UTC) File:Peace Sign 2.svg Merlinus (talk)--merlinus

I was not offended or anything. It is ok to ask someone if they are an admin. My comment above was a reply to nathanrdotcom's comment. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 01:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

includeonly[edit]

That's great! So much simpler and easier to understand. Now I've gotta go around apologizing to people for complicating their welcome templates... TheJabberwʘck 02:59, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA congrats[edit]

Thanks, but I'm afraid that the Wikipedia RFA process doesn't go based on majority; you have to have 75% or so percent to be given the tools. I'm at a 67% rating. Unless the b-crat is really, really kind to me, I doubt I'll get in this time. But thanks anyway! Oh, and about your pic; I'll have it ready really soon, just a bit caught up in schoolwork. Cheers, _-M o P-_ 05:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it's fine[edit]

I don't mind, it's more helping me - I don't answer on my talk page. I don't think people have me on watchlist either, but thank you. And give me a shot now and again! ^_^ Highway Rainbow Sneakers 07:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joining[edit]

So, how do I join Eespraza? {{Lord Dude 12:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)}}[reply]

Go to this list and follow the instructions there. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 14:35, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Singnature[edit]

How do I make a signature? {{Lord Dude 20:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC)}}[reply]

Go to Wikipedia:Tip of the day/June 30, 2006.

May the Force be with you.[edit]

Dear GeorgeMoney,

Thanks for voting on my RFA! I appreciate your faith in me, and was overwhelmed by the positive response to my RFA; for it shows that at least I'm doing something right. :) I've started working to improve myself already, and I hope that next time, things run better, and maybe, just maybe, one day we can bask on the shores of Admintopia together. Thanks and cheers, _-M o P-_ 21:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cats[edit]

Did you remove my cat picture from the cat article? If so why? Thank's, from George M.Miller 19:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You replaced it with another one. If you were going to put it in, you shouldn't replace it, and you should put it on the talk page first. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 22:43, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't my picture 'perfectly good'? Why do you believe it's your place to remove my picture? Who says that you must post a request before adding new pictures? That one's news to me!Miller 13:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You removed another picture, so you could put yours in. You need the community to decide if they want your picture. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 14:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the picture. I've done this many times before and nobody has bitched at me or told me I don't have the right to do it.Miller 15:42, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblocked[edit]

{{unblock|You were blocked by Pepsidrinka for the following reason (see our blocking policy): "Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Here Kitty Here Kitty Kitty Hi. My name is Kitty.". The reason given for Here Kitty Here Kitty Kitty Hi. My name is Kitty's block is: user"}}

The autoblock message gives other details, like the person who was blocked which is causing the autoblock. Can you provide those details please. --pgk(talk) 23:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have added more info. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 23:10, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody, please help me here. I keep looking at my watchlist and seeing vadalism and want to revert it! PLEASE. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 23:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why am I being ignored? Can somebody help me. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 23:21, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please. I have so many things to do on wikipedia. I am a valuable contributor and I have over 1800 edits. Can somebodey do something. I am sitting here waiting in pain to start editing again. Please help me. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 23:33, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Try to edit a page other than this one, I unblocked one related IP. NoSeptember talk 23:45, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes! It works! Thank You! --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 23:46, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

Don't blame me :(. Some people were complaining that it showed "signs of immaturity" and was "too long", so this is my attempt to come to an agreement. MoppEr Speak! 00:39, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know why people think that "your signature makes you immature", or "how many lines your sig takes up is bad". My sig takes up many lines. Also, I don't know why in your RfA, people were talking about "you don't have enough Main Namespace edits". Everything on Wikipedia is all linked to articles in the main namespace. For example, if people have nice userpages, then new editors will stay and edit articles. If you edit user talk pages, you warn them for vandalism of articles. Categories help categorize articles. Wikipedia namespace things such as WikiProjects all want to help articles. What I am trying to say is that everything on wikipedia is related to articles, and that's all that matters. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 00:50, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
When you mention that, please reduce it. Five lines it too much. Thanks! Computerjoe's talk 19:02, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

autoblocks[edit]

Unfortunately, Wikipedia software automatically blocks everyone using a particular IP address whenever any other user using that IP address is blocked. There's no way to turn off autoblocks and no way to give immunity to reputable established users, and no way of knowing in advance what ISP or IP address a given user is using or how many other users might be affected by a block of that user. Usually, autoblocks expire after not too long. -- Curps 06:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the admins did it on purpose until I read the article. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 06:53, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning "2". (Not a vandalism warning)[edit]

Hi,

I have corrected your warning to say it was the first warning, if you had taken the time to read the message left on my talk page before titled "Vandalising" you would have noticed that it is infact NOT a vandalism warning. It is a message from Sceptre who I accused of vandalizing my userpage saying that he believes it is not considered vandalism, and because he's an admin he feels he can do whatever.

Secondly your message

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:HighwayCello. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

continues to show you do not read things carefully enough. My edit summary was

"sorry to vandalize, but I came accross your page and Pokemon due suck"

I already knew far-right-extremists like yourself consider this vandalism, but as I said in the summary I felt it was justified.

In conclusion you should read more, and write less. Preferabley you should do the reading before the writing.

Good day,

--The Mad Bomber 07:36, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was still vandalism, no matter what your edit summary says. And you shouldn't call people "far-right-extremists". Please see WP:NPA --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 07:38, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

Thanks for your help with the signature. Sorry for being such a jerk earlier.

--The Mad Bomber 07:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 07:51, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Script request[edit]

Hi GeorgeMoney. I made a quick script that changes the "edit this page" tab to say only "edit". 


addOnloadHook( function() {
	document.getElementById( "ca-edit" ).firstChild.innerHTML = "edit";
} );

Also, I don't mean to be a dick, but your signature is gigantic. Would you consider revising it so that it's (at least) under 150 characters? Having such a big signature really mucks up the wiki code. Thanks. ~MDD4696 02:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will make a poll on who thinks I should change my signature. And thanks for the script. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 03:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Hello, GeorgeMoney, and thank you for vote on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 62/2/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. As I acclimate myself to my new tools, feel free to let me know how you believe I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! RadioKirk talk to me 05:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, sorry about {{PAGENAME}} but, hey, thanking everyone would take forever otherwise. The sentiment is sincere. :) RadioKirk talk to me 06:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why not just put in the template {{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>PAGENAME}}. Then it automatically SUBST's it in the user talk page, but not in the template itself. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 06:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I just caught that. Thanks. :) RadioKirk talk to me 06:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:GeorgeMoney/sig[edit]

I found this signature page while browsing your signature poll. Just a friendly reminder that you shouldn't use transclusion for signatures; it doesn't seem like you use it often, but I just wanted to make sure you knew. Ral315 (talk) 06:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't use transclusions. I use put the formatting in my preferences. The only time I use it as a template is when it would be too many lines to SUBST it. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 06:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um, dude![edit]

'Ello. Remember moi? Anyways, I looked at your talk/nms page, and I 'allegedly' signed a comment. May I have an explanation? ;) (If it was a joke, yada yada, go ahead and readd me.) --OreosTalkContribs 14:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had to forge peoples' signatures, because if all of the comments were mine, it would look weird. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 16:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Point taken. I guess you can reforge mine. :D --OreosTalkContribs 23:00, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox[edit]

You're welcomed to use the Sandbox, but please don't keep putting Nathanrdotcom's user page there. Other people may also want to use the Sandbox and by doing so, it may confuse them should they need to test their edits. Also, the Sandbox is not meant as a mirror to one's user page. Thanks.—G.He 21:20, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quote form the sandbox Welcome to the Wikipedia Sandbox! This page allows you to carry out experiments. I was doing some experiments. I have the right to do anything to the sandbox. How do you know I wasn't just experimenting with mirroring pages? It also says Content will not stay permanently; this page is automatically cleaned every 12 hours.. So, if it won't stay permanently, then why do you care? It doesn't matter what kind of experiment I do, that's my business.
Look at this edit where somebody copied an article into the sandbox; nobody got confused. --GeorgeMoneyTalk  Contribs 21:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
About the cleaned every 12 hours: The script seems to be currently malfunctioning. Therefore, the reset won't work for users who wish to start with a clean Sandbox. Also, if you wish to do that type of testing, at least leave the header with the instructions.—G.He 22:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Sig[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your concern. I 've already shortened it significantly. Thanks, – Xolatron 15:29, 6 Telona 2006 (7 May)

Why not just have a template with that big code, then use . --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 17:41, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure what you mean... what does "" do?... That big code is a template... I'm farily certain I've done everything possible to shorten my sig length. It has to take the date from User:Xolatron/SW date and subst it in... which is a very complicated process... involving User:Xolatron/subst SW date. To see how my sig is rendered behind the scenes, see User:Xolatron/Signature. – Xolatron 22:14, 6 Telona 2006 (7 May)

Esperanza Newsletter, Issue #3[edit]

The Administrator Coaching program is a program aimed at preparing Wikipedians for Adminship or helping them understand the intricacies of Wikipedia better. Recently, changes have been made to the requirements of coachees. Please review them before requesting this service.
This would be something like the Welcoming Committee, but for people who have figured out the basics of editing articles; they're not newcomers any more, but they might want some help in learning new roles. Some might like suggestions about how to learn vandal patrol, or mentoring on taking an article to featured status, or guidance with a proposal they plan to make at the Village Pump, for example. In this way, Esperanza would help keep hope alive for Wikipedia because we would always be grooming the next generation of admins.
The Stressbusters are a subset of Esperanza aiming to investigate the causes of stress. New eyes on the situation are always welcome!
Note from the editor
As always, MiszaBot handled this delivery. Thank you! Also, congratulations go to Pschemp, Titoxd and Freakofnurture for being elected in the last elections! An Esperanzial May to all of the readership!
  1. Posting logs of the Esperanza IRC channel are explicitly banned anywhere. Violation of this rule results in deletion and a ban from the channel.
  2. A disclaimer is going to be added to the Esperanza main page. We are humans and, as such, are imperfect.
  3. Various revisions have been made to the Code of Conduct. Please see them, as the proposal is ready to be ratified by the community and enacted. All members will members to have to re-confirm their membership after accepting the Code of Conduct.
  4. Referendums are to be held on whether terms of AC members should be lengthened and whether we should abolish votes full stop.
  5. Admin Coaching reform is agreed upon.
Signed...
Celestianpower, JoanneB, Titoxd, Pschemp and Freakofnurture
20:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your most recent template.[edit]

I don't think I can support your most recent creation being copied into template space.

The template space should be reserved for more useful stuff (userboxes, warnings, math, article templates, etc) and not spoofs.

I'm not going to take this to TfD, but just please consider what I've said. Thanks. — nathanrdotcom (Got something to say? Say it.) 04:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if someone nominates it for a TfD , then I'll vote delete. After a year and it has not been deleted, and it has been in use by many people, then I'll leave it. But, you're right. It shouldn't be in the template namespace. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 05:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just nominite it for speedy deletion using {{db-author}}. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 06:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Green[edit]

User:Sango123 added it to my page in a renovation, I would ask her. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 07:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

You've shortened your sig, so I've shortened mine (to be companionable)! :) Sergeant Snopake 9:29, 8 May 2006

It's like this now: Sergeant Snopake. Slightly lighter pink. Sergeant Snopake 15:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I like it too :) . Sorry for a late reply, but my internet connection has been going on and off recently, so sometimes I can't log on. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 23:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Condem/Sig[edit]

Hi GeorgeMoney, I just noticed that on the 29th April, you created a page in my Userspace called User:Condem/Sig without my permission. Please don't make pages in other people's userspace without them asking you too - I'll have to get it speedied. ConDemTalk 23:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll just move it to User:GeorgeMoney/Condem/Sig --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 23:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for moving it, but it's still left a redirect in my userspace, which I'm getting speedied. And I'm not sure I'm too happy about you having a page in your userspace which has my signature in, since the only thing you could use it for, really, is to add it to things without my knowledge (as you did to General Eisnhower's page.) This is also not allowed - if I want to put my sig somewhere, I will, and I'd rather you didn't do it for me without telling me. ConDemTalk 23:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What did I do to General Eisenhower? --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 23:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You added my sig, using the page you created in my userspace, to General Eisenhower's friends list, which appears on his main userpage. See this diff: [1] ConDemTalk 00:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He asked me to help him with that. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 00:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He may have asked you to do it, but that doesn't mean you should. If the General wants people to add themselves as his friends, they can (and I have replaced the link to my sig page with my actual signature). Adding people as his friends without their knowledge isn't right, especially if it involves making pages in their userspace without their permission! ConDemTalk 00:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Look, I don't want to get into a fight here. I made that a long time ago. Can we just forget about this whole thing and be friends? --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 00:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it was only 9 days ago. But of course we can be friends, I just wanted to make sure you understood that many users don't like people adding their names to pages, or creating pages in their userspace, without their permission or knowledge. I'd really appreciate it if you don't use my sig again... As I said, I've replaced my name on General Eisenhower's page, so nothing's changed over there, don't worry! ConDemTalk 00:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
9 days for you is a long time for me. I have alot of stuff going on in real life (e.g. exams), so please can we forget about this and move on. Please don't reply to this, because it will create an even longer discussion. Let's just leave it at that. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 00:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, just one more comment: no hard feelings! ConDemTalk 00:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category[edit]

Thanks for the pointer. :)—G.He 03:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Always glad to help. --GeorgeMoneyTalk Contribs 03:30, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Attention Birthday Committee Members![edit]

{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 1px solid #CC9999; background-color: Yellow;" |align="center"| |align="left" width="100%"|<b>I just have a few general announcements to make to all members of the [[WP:BDC|Birthday Commitee]]: <b> *First, I will be going on a Wikibreak from June 13 to Semptember 10. I really hate being gone for that long, and have to choose someone else to run the committee for those few months. I've asked [[User:Mr. Turcotte|Mr. Turcotte]], and he agreed to it, and knows who to ask next if he changes his mind. *Second, I've decided to make some membership requirements. They're pretty easy to comply to, so pretty much anyone who asks will get in. New members now need 100 edits, to have not been blocked at all over the last 3 months, and to not have been blocked for anymore than 48 hours total since joining the site. *Third, if you still haven't posted your birthday on the project page, please do so. *Fourth, if you'd like to make some new "Happy Birthday Templates," feel free to do so, but I'd like to see and approve/disapprove of all of them first. I'll probably say yes to all of them, though. *Fifth, the [[WP:BDC]] project page needs to be cleaned-up a little. I'll get working on that, but if anyone else has changes they want to make, feel free. *Finally, we need a new template to welcome new members with. If I have time, I'll do it. Please use the name "[[Template:Birthday Welcome]]" for it. |}

Steveo2 11:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


My Signature[edit]

Hi, GeorgeMoney, I have nominated my signature for a poll at WP:SIGPOLL. Please vote here to vote if I should change my signature or not.

Below is a box that shows how my poll is doing:

{{sigpollshow}}

Thanks, --speak togadren 01:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have already voted. --GeorgeMoney T·C 01:20, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Someone vandalized your page[edit]

Thanks, but it's not really vandalism, just a friend of mine who finds it funny that I spend so much time on Wikipedia. Problem is, his SBC Yahoo IP address keeps changing, so I can't give him real warnings. I wouldn't want to, anyway, since he only messes with my userpage. Anyway, thanks for letting me know. TheJabberwʘck 01:26, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some friends of mine also think it's funny that I spend alot of time on Wikipedia too, but they have accounts. BTW, is that the same friend who vandalized your userpage and turned it "gangstery"? --GeorgeMoney T·C 01:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yep! As you can see, his IP is hard to track down. TheJabberwʘck 01:36, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox[edit]

Ummmm.... how do I edit the "warning" header now? I can't seem to edit even if I want to...:P—G.He 23:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for a late reply... Go to Template:Please leave this line alone (sandbox heading)/noedit. I put it there, because it is the only way to make it float. --GeorgeMoney T·C 00:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wow lol. I just realized that the /noedit part was part of the name. I thought it was a special command. :P—G.He 00:08, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page[edit]

Which page is the one that's "protected"?—G.He 00:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It used to be "protected". I will do it again. Wait for me to set it up. --GeorgeMoney T·C 00:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your trick does have its flaws... (See bottom of your user page)—G.He 00:35, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll keep in mind this trick if my page starts to get vandalized. :)—G.He 00:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try editing my page...but don't DRASTICALLY edit.—G.He 01:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Found your flaw. --GeorgeMoney T·C 01:45, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, now I'm making it more confusing...even for me.—G.He 01:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding vandal edit[edit]

I'm really sorry about that edit. I'm still getting the hang of the VandalProof program, and I didn't realize I was warning you until I'd already done it. :( Mo0[talk] 01:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok. That almost happened to me when I first got vandalproof, but luckily, I stopped it. --GeorgeMoney T·C 01:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Summary[edit]

Its a monobook function; two-click revert warn. Kinda like the admin version of Popups. Mopper Speak! 02:18, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

e[edit]

Just how many "e"'s are there besides e & %D0%B5?—G.He 02:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

%D0%B5 is just 1 "e", not 2. --GeorgeMoney T·C 02:28, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are there any others? And how do you find this information—G.He 02:29, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have Windows? --GeorgeMoney T·C 02:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes.—G.He 02:31, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Go to "Start Menu"> run> Type in "Charmap"> press "ok" > select a character and press copy. --GeorgeMoney T·C 02:32, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know that. But where's the different e or other characters?—G.He 02:36, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And also, for the deleted template, did you just copy the code from somewhere or did you actually wrote it?—G.He 02:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
For the letter:Keep going down, and you should see somehting with the description "U+0435: Cryllic small letter le". For the deleted, edit a page that does not exist, and press "show preview" then you should see the code. But, I had to make some changes to the script, or else it will mess up. --GeorgeMoney T·C 02:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I can't seem to see the code when I press show preview... all I see is what I've edited so far...—G.He 02:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
When you edit the non-existent page, don't type anything. And once you get the code, you will have to replace some variables, or else every page you "delete" will have the same name. --GeorgeMoney T·C 02:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, still can't seem to see the code... What browser are you using?—G.He 02:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Firefox, but that doesn't matter. Here is an easier way: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=fdhsjfkjRANDOMPAGEdjjfdljdljsdif&action=submit click that link, and it should work. Once you click that link, you should see a bunch of code in the edit box. --GeorgeMoney T·C 02:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Very interesting... Well, if you don't have any more uses for the Temp pages, I'm gonna try to remove them for now (along with some other subpages that I have no use for...).—G.He 03:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New Birthday Committee Bulletin Format[edit]

{{BDC Bulletin 1}}

Re: Image[edit]

Hi George,

Thanks for modifying the image. It looks great. Anyway I guess I should wait for Mopper to get me his version & then select which one's better.

Cheers

Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 01:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at least for now, do you want to put it in the article instead of the one with the date? --GeorgeMoney T·C 02:22, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help with the image!

A delicious cookie for you for all the help! I think I will go with Mopper's image, but thanks for looking out for me.

Cheers

Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 12:35, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:Main_Page_Firefox_2.jpg[edit]

I have some questions about your browser's screenshot:

  • How did you get the rounded corners (in the page and in all the tabs)?
  • How did you get your IP address displayed on the bottom of your browser?

Thanks. — nathanrdotcom (Got something to say? Say it.) 23:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, that's noy my IP address, that's Wikipedia's. It is an extention for firefox that shows the IP for every website I visit. The extension is called "show IP" and is located here. Secondly, to round your corners, add the following to your monobook.css:
/* make a few corners round, only supported by moz/firefox/other gecko browsers for now */
#p-cactions ul li, #p-cactions ul li a {  
  -moz-border-radius-topleft: 1em;
  -moz-border-radius-topright: 1em;
}
#content { 
  -moz-border-radius-topleft: 1em; 
  -moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 1em;
}
div.pBody {
  -moz-border-radius-topright: 1em;
  -moz-border-radius-bottomright: 1em;
}

Hope that answers your questions. --GeorgeMoney T·C 01:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Well I found one that's called MyIP that does what I thought :p Thanks.
As for the rounded corners, I'll see if that works. ..and it works. What about the rounded corners on Firefox tabs? Thanks. — nathanrdotcom (Got something to say? Say it.) 01:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The rounded tabs are from a special theme called SphereGnome located at http://www.geocities.com/edhume/ . It also can be found at https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/166/ .--GeorgeMoney T·C 01:50, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That might conflict with the one I have. Too bad I'm not resourceful enough to edit the theme I have. Oh well, I might alternate between the two. Thanks. — nathanrdotcom (Got something to say? Say it.) 03:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that SphereGnome theme is a little bright and hard on the eyes :( — nathanrdotcom (Got something to say? Say it.) 04:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It was a little hard on my eyes too at first, but I got used to it.--GeorgeMoney T·C 04:30, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Karmafist[edit]

I may update it when I get a chance. Unfortunately, I'm not sure if Karmafist is coming back. If he does, there'll be more reason to spend time on that page.

Why did you change your sig? Was it too long? Cuz I feel kind of guilty now with this long string of code... --> TheJabberwʘck 03:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it, because of this --GeorgeMoney T· C 04:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage[edit]

Oh, I'm not done yet by any means. Just trying to see if I can get the darn things to take up the whole width of the page, and more. Mopper Speak! 03:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well thanks for working on it :) <I hope that was the appropriate smiley. I am not good with smileys> --GeorgeMoney  T·C 04:24, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archives[edit]

How do I get my archive box to look more interesting like yours? FellowWikipedian 20:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You really should ask nathanrdotcom, because he was the one who made it. I copied this post to his page. --GeorgeMoney T·C 21:53, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I did not know who to ask. Thanks. FellowWikipedian 22:09 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Where is the post? FellowWikipedian 22:11 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry. I just copied it right now. --GeorgeMoney T·C 22:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. FellowWikipedian 22:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:Jaberwocky6669[edit]

Turns out there's quite a few Jabberwocky-related users: User:Thejabberwock, User:Jabberwocky, User:Jaberwocky6669, User:Mome-Rath, and User:Jabberwockyoligarchy, among others. I don't know any of them in real life. TheJabberwʘck 22:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Jabberwocky is a real thing? I thought you made it up or something... --GeorgeMoney T·C 22:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

5th[edit]

I am in the 5th grade. Oh and I really like your new sig. General Eisenhower • (at war or at peace) 22:54, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My younger brother is in fifth. --GeorgeMoney T·C 22:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

Sorry, for copying. I did not mean too. I thought it was a great idea. Next time I will ask. FellowWikipedian 22:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is ok. I like it that you copied it :) --GeorgeMoney T·C 23:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

I responded. Thanks very, very much. Mopper Speak! 00:52, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't received it yet. --GeorgeMoney T·C 00:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Still haven't received it. You can send it to Transform726 AT hotmail DOt com, or boss AT georgemoney DOT com --GeorgeMoney T·C 01:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
is the one I replied to. Mopper Speak! 07:07, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That is weird. If you still have the reply saved, would you send it to . Maybe that one will work.--GeorgeMoney T·C 07:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wierd indeed. Basically, I just wanted to confront the user gently and explain. I also forwarded it to a few other people involved in it, but only them, so don't worry. Mopper Speak! 07:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You can forward it to anybody as long as it's not the user. --GeorgeMoney T·C 07:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

User talk:205.189.97.202 is me when I am not loged in. You sent me a notice there. Also please block again User talk:62.255.232.80 he vandilized my page. User:TeaDrinker took away the vandal edit. FellowWikipedian 01:30, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

62.255.232.80 has been blocked for 24 hours. --GeorgeMoney T·C 02:05, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for your formatting help on the smile templates. The code is much less confusing now. Cowman109Talk 02:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A smile for you![edit]

nathanrdotcom has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}} or {{subst:smile2}} to their talk pages. Happy editing! — nathanrdotcom (Got something to say? Say it.) 02:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Improved[edit]

Where is the new and improved smile? FellowWikipedian 03:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Smile and Template:Smile2 --GeorgeMoney T·C 03:09, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smile![edit]

Wikipedian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}} or {{subst:smile2}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

This diff[edit]

So you're aware... yes, the user did report true vandalism—that already had been dealt with. Reread that user's last paragraph, though, and you'll see that was a sockpuppet of the vandal. RadioKirk talk to me 04:48, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. I didn't read that last paragraph. But, I only reverted to the revision by laserchalenge once. All of the other revisions that Rory096 reverted were not mine. --GeorgeMoney T·C 04:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GeorgeMoney/Archive04&oldid=1218720120"