User talk:GettingFactsRight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enchanted (book) (June 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Zach Vega (talk to me) 10:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Enchanted (book) (June 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! GettingFactsRight, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Enchanted (book) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Enchanted (book). Thanks! ThaddeusB (talk) 13:37, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Enchanted (book) (June 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
JordanKyser22 Talk / Edits / Boxes / Subpages 19:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ben Fowke, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.forbes.com/profile/benjamin-fowke/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tess Holliday, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SWAK. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Enchanted (book), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Enchanted (book)[edit]

Hello, GettingFactsRight. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Enchanted".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Enchanted (book)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 02:21, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dog Mountain (dog park) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dog Mountain (dog park) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog Mountain (dog park) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of François Massau for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article François Massau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/François Massau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christopher Policinski for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Policinski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Policinski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shaun Thompson (fitness) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaun Thompson (fitness) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Thompson (fitness) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Egalia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Egalia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Egalia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

Hello, I would like you to send me an email to my address tmtandaoni at gmail dot com. I would like to discuss some things to do with Wikipedia as I would like to start to make contributions on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.122.243.174 (talk) 17:27, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]