User talk:Giggsy72

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey, thanks for those changes to the new populism intro - I think it's actually pretty good now. Rd232 talk 12:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it appropriate to add history of populism on that page, I have in mind American populist movements such as the Grangers, and populist politicians such as William Jennings Bryan and also the related Distributism movements in England and America and those that between the two world wars flourished in Eastern Europe as well as literature G K Chesterton.The Octopus: A California Story. The article might become too long if this was done in depth. Your thoughts please Backnumber1662 (talk) 07:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm asking you some clarifications on some doubts I put in the end of the discussion page on populism, on a section called See also, as you seem, from other argument on the talk page to be a specialist on this subject. I would like to now If you could answer my doubts and propositions the internal links in the see also of the article.Lususromulus (talk) 20:41, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Giggsy, thanks for you response, I have made a now response on the talk of the populism article. Waiting for more discussion on this, respectably, Lususromulus (talk) 22:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]