User talk:Gindomarlo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Gindomarlo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 03:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Cause of death in infobox on José José article[edit]

Hello. I can't help but notice that you have repeatedly instated a cause of death on the infobox on José José's article. As I have previously pointed out, per template guidelines on how to most effectively use infoboxes, the cause of death parameter "should not be filled in for unremarkable deaths such as those from old age or routine illness", and only when "the cause of death has significance for the subject's notability."

Cancer is a common cause of death, no matter the type. There are very few circumstances under which someone dying from cancer is a core portion of their notability, and as far as I can tell, it's unlikely that his dying from pancreatic cancer is going to become that. If you believe otherwise, and that the cause merits inclusion, please seek consensus on the article's talk page. Continuing to place it on the article after other editors remove it is unlikely to make the change permanent, and you may become involved in an edit war.--Sunshineisles2 (talk) 20:49, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Asqueladd (talk) 04:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse cases, you may be blocked from editing. Sandstein 12:24, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for placing a disruptively unattractive lead image on Harvey Weinstein, in violation of WP:BLP ("Biographies of living persons ("BLPs") must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy"). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Sandstein 19:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gindomarlo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is a block based on the subjective opinion of the administrator who blocked me. there is no way that putting this image is a violation of the WP:MUG. It's just a picture of Winstein smiling on a red carpet. Gindomarlo (talk) 21:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's not and you know it. However, maybe you established consensus for this change; please demonstrate that you did so and I would concur the block should be lifted. Yamla (talk) 22:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hugh Jackman, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 10:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]