User talk:Gnat8

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lines of Amity has been accepted[edit]

Lines of Amity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LittlePuppers (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Lines of amity was an interesting read. Article seems to be well written and researched. Hope you enjoy contributing here and happy editing!

Justi yaya 15:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Gnat8! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Justi yaya 15:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GeekGirlCon moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, GeekGirlCon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 08:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing fine[edit]

Hi, Gnat8, and please also accept my belated welcome. We met at Talk:Lines of amity, and I just wanted to say that I think you're doing a good job, and I know that you are here for the right reasons. Whether we agree or disagree about some minor question of content is irrelevant; that is bound to happen from time to time with any editor, but it's clear that your goal is to improve the article, and that is what counts. I know there are a ton of rules and regulations around here, and it takes time to get on board with stuff; I've been here forever, and I'm still learning. So, go ahead and keep doing what you're doing; I can see from your responses that you are a good candidate to turn into a really good editor. Don't be afraid to ask questions of any trusted editor, and you can also ask at the WP:Tea house or the Wikipedia:Help desk. There's also the handy {{Help me}} template, where you can ask a question right here on your own talk page, and an experienced editor will swing by and answer here; that's very handy, because you can more easily refer back and find your Q&A again later, which is harder to do for archived discussions on other pages. Once again, welcome, and keep up the good work! Mathglot (talk) 03:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Shaw (February 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron Shaw and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 01:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gnat8! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brachy08 _(Talk) 01:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not notable[edit]

Associate professors with minor awards are never going to be Wikipedia-notable. David notMD (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chernoh Alpha M. Bah (April 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chernoh Alpha M. Bah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kevin Roots[edit]

Hello, Gnat8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kevin Roots, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]