User talk:Gogafem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Gogafem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! EVula // talk // // 14:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Mortal Kombat (2011 video game). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you.

In addition to the warning, I'll say that the release date for the MK game can say "Spring 2011" instead of just "2011" once there's a source for that. The stuff I've seen has just said that it'll be released sometime in 2011, rather than specifically in the spring. If you've got a source, by all means provide it, but that's not a good reason to call people idiots. EVula // talk // // 14:53, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're continuing to change the infobox to say "Q2 2011". Until you have a source for that, you'll keep getting reverted. Please stop. EVula // talk // // 18:22, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To double up on what Evula said, it is all very well insisting that Ed Boon said Spring 2011, but you need to show us a link to the proof as to where he said it. "You're an idiot, you know nothing about the game" is not proof, it is a blatant insult, and that will make us less willing to believe you. CBFan (talk) 10:14, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:UMKDS.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:UMKDS.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 20:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Image Screening Bot (talk) 20:01, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

N00bs and Idiots[edit]

We have already told you about this. It is not nice to call people names or insult them....so don't. CBFan (talk) 17:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article PB Bear and Friends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely in-universe article about a non-notable TV show.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SnottyWong verbalize 19:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UMKDS.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UMKDS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]