User talk:Golfeditor1

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Golfeditor1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Golfeditor1 (talk) 19:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is quite clear you are not here to build an encyclopaedia, instead you're purely here to (badly) self promote yourself on your Wikipedia page and get upset with people when they point you to Wikipedia policies and try to explain to you why your edits won't stay. Since over all the time you've been here you have shown no interest in doing any editing other than promoting yourself, and you instead resorting to name calling, trolling and other unsavoury behaviours, it's quite clear that this is not the place for you. Canterbury Tail talk 20:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's quite clear that anyone responding to abuse in an equal manner is just bullied out of the platform by sanctimonious hypocrites.

"had been spammed by an editor that repeatedly was changing false information on a page I edit; yes, I called them a 'karen troll', but it cannot be that rogue users that do nothing but cause aggravation can get an account blocked; that's the real abuse!"

@Golfeditor1: You are not permitted to remove declined unblock messages from this page while you remain blocked. If you personally attack another editor again as you did here, you will also lose access to edit this page too. stwalkerster (talk) 22:13, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't change the fact that Phil Knight is a complete and utter muppet

and you are 'permitted' to harass people .. the admin in question should be in a rubber room by the looks of their profile .. it's sickening and the cult of Wikipedia is a really bad joke.

August 2023[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

stwalkerster (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #77999[edit]

`is closed. Always amazed when someone blocked for personal attacks and harassment complains that Wikipedia is a toxic environment. The irony dazzles me. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]