User talk:Goodreg3/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Goodreg3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 27 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Annie Lennox. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You need consensus for an image change - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

  • Hmm. Disruptive editing? I don't see how it's fair to accuse my edits as being "disruptive"? I am clear on guidelines and polices. Thank you. Goodreg3 (talk) 02:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Did you read my edit summaries ? You need consensus for an infobox image change. - Mlpearc (open channel) 02:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I did read the edit summaries. Thanks. Goodreg3 (talk) 03:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Troon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page P&O. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:EastAyrshireWhiteLogo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:EastAyrshireWhiteLogo.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:46, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Scotland "politics and governance" edits

I have reverted these because I believe they do not adhere to WP:NPOV or WP:UNDUE. The "international diplomacy" section largely details what Nicola Sturgeon has been doing since becoming First Minister (visiting California, New York, Ireland and Germany). That might be relevant to her own article, but I don't think it is relevant in a more general article. The first two paragraphs ("devolved government relations") are only sourced to the governments themselves. Is this notable, worth detailing in what is supposed to be a general article about Scotland as a whole? Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Scottish cuisine into Scotland. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

South Ayrshire

Just a heads up as it seems unlikely the contributor in question is going to notify you of this: Sport and politics has replied to you on her user talk page and has added three sections to the South Ayrshire talk page. Brythones (talk) 13:41, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for working together on this one for the better of the South Ayrshire article. It seems anything on the article is not good enough and the user is willing to through any excuse into the pot to argue her case for removal of the content. Goodreg3 (talk) 19:55, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicola Sturgeon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Democratic, Better Together and Edinburgh Agreement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Billy Gilmour (Scottish footballer)

The article Billy Gilmour (Scottish footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:47, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

The article is currently stubbed and as I made clear I will be adding to this article over the coming day which will pollute it further in terms of useful information. The article has barely been created for an hour. With the little information on it already, its already being nominated for deletion, but as I said it will be getting added to over the coming days. Please bare with me. Goodreg3 (talk) 18:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Mcmanus

Please stop the aggressive personal attacks on this page, and the childish threats. Please use talk to agree what is allowed to be posted on the page before making changes to unsourced claims. If we work together then we can get the age looking better and stop the edit wars you seem to be attempting. Please assume good faith from all other editors. There is no need to just start accusing me and being offensive because I asked for a source for the record label claim. Thats what you are supposed to do on wiki. Once we have a source then we can add this back to the page, but not without oneSimply-the-truth (talk) 20:01, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Simply the truth obviously has an agenda against McManus, which is damaging the credibility of her article. WP:NOTHERE clearly applies. Thanks for keeping an eye on this troll. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:6A60:8000:1D17:78DA:875C:2EA1 (talk) 21:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

It’s a two way street and I can just as easily turn the “personal attacks” rubbish back onto you. You are on my talk page and I could easily accuse you of being abusive. Follow your own advice, provide references to otherwise dispute the claims on the article. If you actually read the edits rather than edit war (yes, you are engaging in an edit war) then you will see a reference had been provided to support the stabilisment of her own record label. Goodreg3 (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Errr? Do you understand what a personal attack is? Please feel free to point any of mine out, ill wait???? There is not source at all anywhere that she set her own record label up? She said she would, that is not a source, you understand that right? I have reported you for making threats that you have the power to ban me etcSimply-the-truth (talk) 14:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Aw please. Get over yourself. If, according to you, I don't have the power to block you, then I highly doubt you have the power to report me for making "threats" (Please, point me to any threat worthy of being reported. Wikipedia Community Guidelines have long been established and there are strict rules and protocols against trolls and sockpuppets such as yourself). So, if I were you, I would quit whilst you are ahead! Goodreg3 (talk) 20:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
so you admit im ahead (ie your losing), good, then I will quitSimply-the-truth (talk) 21
26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Stop threatening me and leaving your "word of warning"

Your constant harassment has been reported, and your childish threats just literally make me lol. Simply-the-truth (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

You clearly haven't accepted a word I have said, which clearly shows your immaturity. I stand by what I say because I'm not wasting my time on you any longer as you are the childish one and being threatening here. I actually totally pity you, I really, really do. Take my word of warning as some kind advice. Your time will come anyway and will get blocked, just don't moan when you do because you had plenty of warning. Now, please, go troll elsewhere. Cherio. Goodreg3 (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
My advice to both of you, stop arguing and go on with your lives.--Biografer (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Which is exactly what I am trying to do by reaching out to the user and calling quits. Please visit their talk page and you will see this was ignored and actually removed by the user. Goodreg3 (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I seen their talkpage, but if they don't want to discuss it there, they should discuss it here. Correct me if I am wrong, but they suppose to discuss it somewhere. My other suggestion would be to seek dispute resolution at AN/I.--Biografer (talk) 16:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
What's even more strange is that he leaves the welcome message, although that can be removed as well. But maybe he keeps it because of helpful links, which I can see he is clearly not here to abide by.--Biografer (talk) 17:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
@Goodreg3 - Simply the Truth is an immature person who is only here to wind people up - that's all. Best to ignore him and wait for an admin to pick up on his disruption and ban him. His behaviour isn't normal but with people like this, it's best just to ignore them otherwise they will keep going on and on and on and on and on..... Peace! LoveEverybodyUnconditionally (talk) 18:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
If you really want to call it quits, im all for it mate. Must admit your tone (if you can have tone when typing!!) did wind me up, as im sure I did to you as well. I really was trying to improve that article, and hate unsourced claims as you know now! So, both in the wrong. Apology from my side, lets start again. Friends?Simply-the-truth (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Not sure who you are talking to, but if it's me, no. You are very weird and I have no desire to be your friend. No offence. LoveEverybodyUnconditionally (talk) 22:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
I was replying to the ediditor whos talk page this is, Goodreg3?Simply-the-truth (talk) 13:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Who says this talk page belongs to Goodreg3? Do you have a source for it? If not, it's not true. I hate unsourced claims. LoveEverybodyUnconditionally (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
No need to be childish re this? I was trying to start again with Goodreg3, I wasnt talking to you, so please can you stop abusing their talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simply-the-truth (talk • contribs) 12:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Childish? What if I am a child? How dare you assume my age or imply there is something wrong with the way children act? Please stop these unwarranted and relentless personal attacks on my good character immediately. LoveEverybodyUnconditionally (talk) 19:02, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear friends. Can this please be taken elsewhere? Simply-the-truth's statement of apology has been taken in good faith. Thank you. Goodreg3 (talk) 19:37, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

WP:BLANKING

People are free to remove messages from their own talk page. Please don't revert anyone else's cleanup of their own talk page as you did here. Admins can enforce this rule if needed. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to South Ayrshire you included material from a webpage that is available under an Open Government Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Goodreg3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Believers (Deacon Blue album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and Pop (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Eurovision Young Musicians 2018, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Edinburgh is in the United Kingdom. You can also see that the colors in the EYM logo are the ones of the Union Jack flag. —Dimsar01 Talk ⌚→ 19:28, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Yes Edinburgh is in the United Kingdom, and yes the logo shows the British flag colours, however, the argument could also be the host broadcaster is BBC Scotland (only applicable to Scottish broadcasting, therefore, could be argued Scotland is credited with hosting titles). However, to avert confusion, both Scotland and United Kingdom has been added, as no matter what way you look at it, Edinburgh is in Scotland, and the main broadcast itself spoke solely of Scotland and Edinburgh being the Capital of Scotland, no mention of the United Kingdom. Goodreg3 (talk) 19:30, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
@Goodreg3: As I can see in your user page, you support the independence of Scotland. Your opinion is respected but in WP we try to have a neutral point of view. Also, in all song contest infoboxes, we never add the region of the city; just the city and the country. —Dimsar01 Talk ⌚→ 19:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, but what has me supporting Scottish independence got to do with correctly displaying the geographical location of cities? That is a rather narrow minded viewpoint if I may say so myself. The adding of this information has absolutely nothing to do with my support of Scottish independence. Also, Scotland is not a "Region" as you describe it, it is a country (please see Countries of the United Kingdom, which refers to the term "countries within a country"}. Granted, the United Kingdom is the sovereign state, but Scotland is by no means a "region". Thanks! Goodreg3 (talk) 19:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Random gallery

Could you read over WP:Galleries.....best a GA article follows our basic guidelines.--Moxy (talk) 23:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mince (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Goodreg3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Celebritynetworth.com as a source

Hi Goodreg3 . I noticed that you recently used celebritynetworth.com as a source for biographical information in Michelle McManus. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal/Ronz (talk) 22:12, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jason Leitch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airdrie. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

First Ministerial portrait on Nicola Sturgeon

Why did you change the infobox image in the Nicola Sturgeon article without prior consensus? That’s not how we do things here at Wikipedia. If you want the image changed, discuss at the talk page! I’ve reverted until we can achieve consensus. Ciaran.london (talk) 22:47, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

WP:COPYWITHIN

As I have already indicated, please do not unthinkingly copy/paste vast, wholesale swathes of texts from other articles as you have at Scotland. Familiarise yourself with WP:COPYWITHIN. Your first effort was already better served by the link to the main article; the same may have been applicable to your second effort but it wasn't even pertinent to the section into which you dropped it. Mutt Lunker (talk) 00:19, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to SCOTLAND, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your persistence in violating WP:COPYWITHIN, despite warnings, is becoming disruptive. Please stop. Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:53, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. The article Scotland is already well over the suggested limit of 10,000 words, so to add material from the sub-articles is not appropriate. To continue to do so over the objections of other editors is disruptive and edit warring, for which you can be blocked. Please stop. — Diannaa (talk) 15:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Bute House

Hi - Please do not copy and paste material from the guidebook as you did with this article. It is a copyright violation. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 00:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Mutt Lunker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kilmarnock, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do not cite sources which provide no support for your edits. That was an article about a historical entity. Mutt Lunker (talk) 01:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kilmarnock. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You are persisting in the wholesale copying and pasting of material, into articles in contravention of WP:COPYWITHIN and WP:COPYVIO, despite multiple warnings; I have only just noticed that you have been being warned about this for years now. Please desist. Pinging @Diannaa: for comment, as an admin who has been periodically intervening. Mutt Lunker (talk) 13:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

I have added a comment to your personal talk page Matt as I am really not happy about this and your previous revert on the KIlmarnock page. Please provide support of your claim for copyright violations. I can’t help but feel these reverts are personal, and stated by myself before. Please let’s participate in a constructive conversation about this and find a resolution. It’s been claimed that my edits have been disruptive, and, quite simply, I feel that accusation is false and quite frankly insulting. Goodreg3 (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Firstly, as you have posted in this section, I'll make it clear that your recent edits to Bute House were unambiguously copied and pasted from another site, without substantial paraphrase or editing. You have been doing this kind of thing repeatedly in recent days and, I now realise, have been warned about this for years. It's a bit rich to feel insulted about something you have substantial and recent form for. I now see that your edit regarding Johnnie Walker at Kilmarnock was not an addition of the material but a move of existing material. This material, and some other material that you edited, can be found in other documents but, if this is a copyvio, it was not down to your edits of today. You can't, however, be surprised if you are cut less slack with such an established modus operandum, executed so recently. Unpinging @Diannaa:, as in this instance it appears to have been a false alarm. Mutt Lunker (talk) 18:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Copyright problem icon Your edit to St Andrew's House has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Mutt Lunker (talk) 01:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Kyle Rittenhouse.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kyle Rittenhouse.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —ADavidB 04:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

A sysop has since removed the file from the two articles in which it was included, and informed me that it was already nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons. —ADavidB 04:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Goodreg3/Archive_1&oldid=1056891868"