User talk:GorillaContributor

PLease reply..

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Three Smart Saps, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Three Smart Saps was changed by GorillaContributor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931636 on 2012-04-11T02:57:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Peccadillos with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Judicatus (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Do It, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Do It was changed by GorillaContributor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957911 on 2012-04-11T02:59:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Menti fisto 03:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GorillaContributor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey, I can't be blocked for this. I know I was given warnings to stop what I was doing, but here is the thing: I NEVER READ THEM. That's it. Please give me another chance

Decline reason:

That you never read the warnings is not exculpatory. Editors here, on the other hand, did read your contributions about diarrhea and sweaty men's scrotums. I note that your unblock request does not address your editing behavior, and can only assume that if you were to be unblocked (because "you didn't read the warnings") you'd continue with the same infantile vandalism. Drmies (talk) 03:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GorillaContributor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please, I didnt even know I was doing anything wrong.. I never read the warnings.. Please give me another chance. Looking back I realize my conributions were chilkdish but now i am ready to actually be mature and grow up

Decline reason:

And you think "I need a warning to know that this is wrong" is a good justification? Max Semenik (talk) 06:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks, but honestly..[edit]

I really have nothing useful to contribute here. But I respect what you guys are doing. You guys are doing things with good intentions for no pay for the purpose of helping people, which is really cool. GorillaContributor (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help[edit]

{{help|Can anyone help me out in getting my account unblocked? Thanks!!}}

Yes, you need to use {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}} (like you did in 2012). Majavah (talk!) 18:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GorillaContributor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not sure if I made any constructive edits with this account, but I am very bored in quarantine and I am interested in getting back to it. I am much older now than I was when I first created my account. I would like for an unblock from editing, and I would also like to be granted access to my talk page. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 05:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.