Hello Gosox5555, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 16:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for stripping the stub tag off of "U" Is for Undertow. When I sat down to start the article I'd intended to write just a place-holding stub but found so much good material that my placeholder got away from me a bit. - Dravecky (talk) 23:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Gosox5555. You have new messages at DC's talk page. Message added 05:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
On February 1, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gold parting, which you recently nominated. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Hello! Your submission of Carl E. Taylor at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! JujutacularT · C 16:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've added an alternative. Take a look. Gosox(55)(55) 21:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the message, I will try to categorize stubs more specifically. One thing: the more specific stub you placed at the article doesn't work. See [1]. Sincerely, --PinkBull 02:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We could sure use your help at Wikiproject Running. Please check out our new to-do list and lend a hand. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 06:02, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks fo r your note. I'll look into it. We have had this problem with the site (apparently) giving blank pages to bots occaisionally, and there's a fix in AWB to stop form ssaving blank pages. I suppose in this case the pages is no longer blank, so the fix doesn't work. Rich Farmbrough 23:18 28 May2010 (UTC).
DYK nomination of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1217[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:17, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission of Carl E. Taylor at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jujutacular T · C 16:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
