User talk:Graceking123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Graceking123! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bible Break (album) has been accepted[edit]

Bible Break (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 19:40, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contribution, that is a great topic for addition to our encyclopedia. We normally need two sources that have been through an editorial process, and your draft needed one more (one was find, but HHHDB doesn't meet our source standards), so I added two and accepted the article. Welcome to Wikipedia! --j⚛e deckertalk 19:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Social Club (band) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You inserted an image from https://www.facebook.com/socialxclub/photos/a.510700982315763.127794.412274025491793/847301075322417/ Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:15, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hostyle Gospel (January 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Chris Troutman (talk) 13:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Graceking123, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 13:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Pettidee has been accepted[edit]

Pettidee, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: P.I.D. (January 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eurodyne was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Eurodyne (talk) 23:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Graceking123. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by John from Idegon (talk) 01:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thi'sl has been accepted[edit]

Thi'sl, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

BenLinus1214talk 01:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Sunshine!
Hello Graceking123! Bananasoldier (talk) has given you a bit of sunshine to brighten your day! Sunshine promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day better. Spread the sunshine by adding {{subst:User:Meaghan/Sunshine}} to someone else's talk page, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. In addition, you can spread the sunshine to anyone who visits your userpage and/or talk page by adding {{User:Meaghan/Sunshine icon}}. Happy editing! Bananasoldier (talk) 01:06, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Canon[edit]

I went ahead and created the article.The Cross Bearer (talk) 05:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I expanded what you created in the draft.The Cross Bearer (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I created it because it was in fact notable and was BOLD in doing that deed.The Cross Bearer (talk) 02:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You got credit for it now, go and look on your articles created. I never intended to take the credit away, I just wanted the article to get to main space.The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The Cross Bearer has given you a brownie! Brownies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a brownie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. †

Hostyle Gospel[edit]

Notable Christian hip hop artists[edit]

You should take a look at creating, Everyday Process and Young Joshua. This will help you see how to create notable content because I have already verified them both for you.The Cross Bearer (talk) 01:37, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I got Everyday Process completed.The Cross Bearer (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@The Cross Bearer Ok, I'll get started on Young Joshua now. Thank you again for the helpful tips. Graceking123 (talk) 02:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You will be needing, this chart link to satisfy notability requirements.The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@The Cross Bearer I finished the article for Young Joshua. Let me know what you think. Also, if it need some improvement feel free to do so. Graceking123 (talk) 05:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I got all issues addressed to prove notability.The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@The Cross Bearer I'll started working on Viktory right away article! Graceking123 (talk) 14:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@The Cross Bearer I finished Viktory draft. Please let me know what you think. Draft:Viktory Graceking123 (talk) 22:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, it is well constructed, you are learning a tremendous amount, keep up the good work.The Cross Bearer (talk) 22:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Graceking123 (talk) 22:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viktory[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Cross Bearer (talk) 08:13, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6 Way Street[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Cross Bearer (talk) 02:44, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

6 Way St.[edit]

Now, what do you think?The Cross Bearer (talk) 02:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Cross Bearer Not too shabby! Graceking123 (talk) 03:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

I want you to look at my user page. I just created the page.The Cross Bearer (talk) 07:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have a 100 percent acceptance rate on all 65 articles that I have created, since I started editing on January 6, 2015.The Cross Bearer (talk) 08:06, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

You could work on Willie "Pdub" Moore, Jr., if you want to the draft for him to see what the administrators think of his notability. His album with Bizzle charted on three Billboard charts. The AllMusic list the album under Bizzle for the charts, but (link: http://www.billboard.com/biz/search/charts?f[0]=ts_chart_artistname%3APDUB&f[1]=ss_bb_type%3Achart_item&type=2&artist=PDUB) Billboard lists it to both of them, which is what Amazon.com proves to be true.The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am using this as a test case to see if a dual work can prove notability for an artist that charts.The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'll get right on it.Graceking123 (talk) 03:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hostyle Gospel[edit]

I saw the ref you just added to the draft. Looks like that's pretty serious in-depth coverage and reliable too (the site's on this list). I'd advise you to add whatever you can from that source and then the article should be ready for mainspace. You'll just have to find an admin to review/accept it, since it's create-protected. --Jakob (talk) 23:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another[edit]

I just got done with creating, Kidd (American rapper).The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:23, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Willie "Pdub" Moore Jr. has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Willie "Pdub" Moore Jr.. Thanks! John from Idegon (talk) 10:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning Grace. I am going to move your article to mainspace. That means it is published!!!! I am going to ask you to do one thing for me though. Please use the Cite Journal template for your reference to Billboard. The "title" field is the name of whatever chart, the journal is billboard, put in the date of the publication and the access date (today), add the link to google and click the show/hide extra fields tab and enter the page number and the ISSN number which is 0006-2510. I found that by clicking the "about this magazine" tab on the google page linked. Write me with any questions, and Happy editing! John from Idegon (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Willie "Pdub" Moore Jr. has been accepted[edit]

Willie "Pdub" Moore Jr., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

John from Idegon (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia[edit]

So, do you now believe that Wikipedia is just, when it comes to artist inclusion?The Cross Bearer (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • In your effort to get Hostyle Gospel accepted, use RedCloud to convey the message that I created.The Cross Bearer (talk) 07:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @The Cross Bearer So, what should I do with the Hostyle Gospel draft article? Should I rewrite it or do you want to rewrite the article? I'm starting to feel like giving on this group, but I feel like the Lord is telling not to give up on any of his Christian artists, writers, poets etc. Plus I saw this group in concert before and they are amazing. So, I thought this would look good on my resume for articles I helped created. Graceking123 (talk) 14:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • First and foremost, I advise you not to give up on the article. It would be a travesty if they are not included on this encyclopedia. I am determined along with you to see this article through to creation. If needed, I will rewrite the article, but right now it is done just fine. This should be enough for an administrator to determine they are in fact notable for inclusion, per band. It is a worthwhile endeavor to get these articles created, just remember that at the end of the day.The Cross Bearer (talk) 00:26, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • @The Cross Bearer Thank you for the support and encouragement me! I'll keep trying, not just with this group but with other groups as well. Graceking123 (talk) 03:36, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hostyle Gospel has been accepted[edit]

Hostyle Gospel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:19, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats! --Jakob (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JakobThank you! Now it's time to make more Christian articles!! Graceking123 (talk) 00:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Told you, it would get created. I know it must feel great.The Cross Bearer (talk) 05:44, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another suggestion[edit]

Their is a female gospel group called, Witness, who are notable, and they don't presently have an article on Wikipedia. You can look at AllMusic and Cross Rhythms to see they have gotten coverage. Plus, their music has charted on the Billboard charts numerous times, especially the Top Gospel Albums chart.The Cross Bearer (talk) 05:43, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want some more suggestions, feel free and just ask because I got many more on my radar.The Cross Bearer (talk) 08:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@The Cross Bearer I'm on it. Graceking123 (talk) 12:47, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Witness (Gospel quartet) (March 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Witness (Gospel quartet)[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good job[edit]

I hope you keep up the good work on Wikipedia.The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Cross Bearer Thank you! You've been so helpful to me in my journey and experience on Wikipedia. I feel like with encouraging individuals like yourself; Wikipedia becomes less complicated to figure out and much easier to participate and contribute content. Graceking123 (talk) 12:58, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you need any further assistance, just feel free and ask on my talk page or yours with a ping, and I would be more than happy to assist.The Cross Bearer (talk) 18:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Interested[edit]

If you are interested, I would love if you would take a look at the three artists with red links on the Verity Records page. They are more than likely notable.The Cross Bearer (talk) 04:04, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Cross Bearer No problem, I'll will get right on it. But can I ask a favor from you? I've been trying to clear my sandbox for a few days now so I can work on other articles, but the last article title will not erase. Do you know how to empty or erase a sandbox? Graceking123 (talk) 05:14, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I got it fixed.The Cross Bearer (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
  • I want you to take your time with 21:03, and knock it out of the ballpark. If you need guidance, when you get the time to work on the article, just fire a beacon away, and I'll be there.The Cross Bearer (talk) 00:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Radar[edit]

Why don't you keep an eye on a Christian girl group, Zie'l. They are about ready to release their second album, and the first one charted. I want you to tell me if they pass or fail Band, by doing some research, when you get the time.The Cross Bearer (talk) 07:46, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Cross Bearer Okay, I will! Graceking123 (talk) 19:37, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to find more notable content, just peruse the Wow Gospel albums, such as WOW Gospel 2013 and many more.The Cross Bearer (talk) 08:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (21:03) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating 21:03, Graceking123!

Wikipedia editor Shibbolethink just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi Graceking123, you might consider putting your article "21:03" in some categories! You can do this using [[Category:XXXX]] like Christian Rock groups, or what have you. Good luck!

To reply, leave a comment on Shibbolethink's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nicholas[edit]

You can work on the gospel music duo, Nicholas, which they have charted numerous albums.The Cross Bearer (talk) 05:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but I got it done, Nicholas (duo).The Cross Bearer (talk) 03:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:P.I.D. concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:P.I.D., a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:P.I.D.[edit]

Hello, Graceking123. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "P.I.D.".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Graceking123. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:I Am Not The One[edit]

Hello, Graceking123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "I Am Not The One".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bible Break[edit]

Information icon Hello, Graceking123. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bible Break, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bible Break[edit]

Hello, Graceking123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bible Break".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Graceking123&oldid=1143029660"