User talk:Graham Beards/Archives/2022

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Answer[edit]

It’s an accuracy thing. He did not die at home. He attempted to die at home but didn’t die until several days later in hospital. Jehochman Talk 11:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the UK, it makes no difference how long it took for him to die. The Coroner's verdict was death by suicide. Graham Beards (talk) 11:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Fifteenth anniversary on Wikipedia![edit]


Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society[edit]

Dear Graham Beards/Archives/2022,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 02:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

Chris Troutman (talk) 02:17, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Chris. Graham Beards (talk) 09:04, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
  • The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Bragg[edit]

Hiya!

Thank you very much for protecting Billy Bragg's page.

Just a heads up that when his page was vandalised calling him cis, it's because he's a trans ally: https://twitter.com/billybragg/status/1537403855822012419 That vandalism counts as transphobia - not just normal vandalism. Under WP:No Nazis, this vandalism would be indefinitely blocked on sight since it's discriminatory against trans people. I'm not trying to tell you how to do your job, I'm just saying to keep in mind that these weren't ordinary incidents. Due to the similarity of the edits in such a short time-span, I believe this may be a co-ordinated effort by transphobes. 92.10.13.209 (talk) 17:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll continue watching the page after the protection expires. Thanks for contacting me. Graham Beards (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yw! 92.10.13.209 (talk) 20:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious[edit]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Herpes virus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jameslynch99[edit]

Not saying your block was wrong, but can we try to work with James over these issues? That Mick Lynch doesn't want an article on Wikipedia counts for nothing. He meets the notability threshold and an article has been written. It is unlikely to be deleted via AfD. Wikipedia's job is to ensure it complies with BLP. If James raises any issues, we should work through them in a collaborative manner. Mjroots (talk) 13:02, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erm.. I didn't see James' comment until after I issued the block. I came to the article after seeing Wikipedia ridiculed on a journalist's Facebook page, where a screenshot of an earlier vandalised version of the Lynch article was posted. I saw that James had already had a warning and I acted accordingly. I have no particular interest in the Lynch article as I am busy working on Virology. I think James just wants the article deleted, which is not at all likely. I don't think James is likely to raise any issues that we cannot deal with under WP:BLP. Graham Beards (talk) 13:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I saw a screenshot of the vandalism on Twitter. I'm going to temporarily watchlist the article and will go through the history of the article to see if there is anything that needs to be hidden from the public gaze. Mjroots (talk) 13:26, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Jagger nominated for FAC[edit]

Hello Graham Beards! I am reaching out as you reviewed Paint It Black when it was at FAC. I have nominated Mick Jagger for FAC and was wondering if you would have the time and be able to post a review there? If so, it is located here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Mick Jagger/archive1. If not, I totally understand. TheSandDoctor Talk 23:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NIHR studies[edit]

Hi,

I've seen that you removed some of studies from the NIHR Evidence page for being primary sources. I have posted on the WikiProject Medicine talk page here about adding NIHR sources as part of my Wikipedia residency. The reasoning behind using NIHR Evidence is that even though some of the articles are based on primary sources they are chosen by a committee of medical professionals based on their importance, strength of evidence so in essence they go through sort of an evaluation or review. Also the reference removed from the Antimicrobial resistance article is a health technology assessment, I think that is counted as strong evidence. What do you think? Thanks, Adam Harangozó (NIHR WiR) (talk) 09:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I presume are referring to this edit [1]. I removed the addition by a newly registered editor because it was based on a single primary study and there were spelling errors. I think we need much more evidence to support the claim that three days of antibiotic treatment in kids with pneumonia is as effective as seven. I don't see why you think "a health technology assessment" complies with WP:MEDRS. Graham Beards (talk) 10:26, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And the discussion did not find that they did. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

Technical news

  • user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TFA nom for rotavirus[edit]

I have nominated rotavirus to be today's featured article on an unspecified date. If you are inclined, please join the conversation on its nomination page. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

Administrator changes

readded Valereee
removed Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • Capitalistroadster • Samsara

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
  • An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

Technical news

  • The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
  • Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
  • Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
  • Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Article Save Award for Enzyme inhibitor[edit]

There is a Featured Article Save Award nomination at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review/Enzyme inhibitor/archive1. Please join the discussion to recognize and celebrate editors who helped assure this article would retain its featured status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:00, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

-sysop[edit]

Hello Graham Beards, per your request at WP:BN, I've removed your sysop flag. Should you need any of the "lesser included" flags (from WP:PERM) feel free to ping me, or request at WP:PERM in the future. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 16:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Graham Beards (talk) 16:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Job Done
Awarded to Graham Beards for good services as an admin, and for resigning the tools in a noble manner. SilkTork (talk) 18:08, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Graham Beards (talk) 05:25, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for your service to the community as an admin, Graham Beards. I am pleased to hear that you plan to stay on as an editor and that we aren't losing you. I am in the same boat as Xaosflux; if you need anything just ping. --TheSandDoctor Talk 15:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Graham Beards (talk) 19:04, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of FAR[edit]

An article which you have contributed to, Hillary Clinton, has been nominated for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. ––FormalDude talk 06:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall contributing to this article. Graham Beards (talk) 10:48, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for your significant contributions over the years.. Volten001 ☎ 13:54, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Graham Beards (talk) 14:09, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

rotavirus[edit]

hello, Graham Beards! i had two questions regarding this article and the associated blurb.

  • is the singular form "rotavirus" generally used when the virus is referred to by its common name? i had assumed otherwise because "Rotaviruses" was used in the second sentence of the article lead. this is also why i had assumed that many of the capitalized instances of the singular form were using the name of the genus, since i know that, for larger life forms, whether the singular or plural form is used may depend on whether the organism is referred to by its common or scientific name and whether the name is preceded by an article. for example, one may state "Oryctolagus cuniculus was domesticated centuries ago", "Bunnies were domesticated centuries ago", or "The bunny was domesticated centuries ago", but "Bunny was domesticated centuries ago" does not sound right to me. the coronavirus article appears to be using the plural form in the statement "Human coronaviruses were discovered in the 1960s", but i do not know if the same should apply here. i admittedly have no expertise in the matter, having only learned while copyediting this blurb that "rotavirii" is not a commonly used plural form.
The common name is "rabbit". Graham Beards (talk) 06:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • is it still the case that genome segment 9 is believed to be the only genome segment that codes for two proteins? the cited estes and cohen source is from 1989 and only lists five nonstructural proteins in its table 4, while the featured article's table lists six nonstructural proteins, with genome segment 11 accounting for the encoding of two of them. (the nsp6 article also mentions this.) nsp6, however, is found encoded in an out-of-phase open reading frame, so i do not know if that is why genome segment 11 was not considered to be a genome segment that coded for two proteins. also, the featured article's table is based on the sa11 strain, so perhaps genome segment 11 generally does not code for two proteins.
The article is correct see: Uprety T, Wang D, Li F (September 2021). "Recent advances in rotavirus reverse genetics and its utilization in basic research and vaccine development". Archives of Virology. 166 (9): 2369–2386. doi:10.1007/s00705-021-05142-7. PMC 8254061. PMID 34216267.Graham Beards (talk) 06:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

dying (talk) 21:06, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. First of all, you could make my life easier by writing proper sentences. Secondly, I suggest you read this by the International Committee for Taxonomy of Viruses. With regard to the rotavirus genome coding assignments, I think I have got it right. I'll double check when it is not past my bedtime. Best regards. Graham Beards (talk) 21:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you today for the article, introduced (in 2008): I'm self-nominating this article for featured article because I have worked on Rotavirus for four months and now I think it is ready. I have been fortunate to have received a lot of help and guidance from very experienced editors and contributors whose names are on the article's Discussion page. (Although this does imply support and any remaining issues are probably all my own work). The WP:MOS has been followed throughout and the images are my own and have been donated freely to the project. The article is stable and the subject is not controversial. The article is written from a neutral point of view and all facts are supported by in-line citations from reliable sources, of which free-content material has been used when it has been possible. In structuring the article I have been mindful of the great variety Wikipedia readers and have placed the more technical/difficult material at the end."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reign of Cleopatra FA Review[edit]

Hi, @Graham Beards. Please take a look at the message I have left Buidhe on Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Reign of Cleopatra/archive1. Thanks, Unlimitedlead (talk) 21:05, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it, thanks, and I don't agree with your response. Graham Beards (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is quite unfortunate. If you do not mind, would you please give constructive criticism on the nomination page itself? That way, PericlesofAthens and I can work to improve the article based on your recommendations. Please specify exactly what you're looking for, and I will try my best to make it happen. Thanks. Unlimitedlead (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have withdrawn the nomination. Graham Beards (talk) 05:38, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"such as"[edit]

Hi! It's good to know that someone "patrols" Introduction to viruses. :) About this revert: the repetition is a fair point, but "(influenza virus)" makes it sound like this virus is the only one transmitted that way. --o_andras (talk) 15:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi nice to meet you. I think I do more than patrol these articles. Taken out of context you could be right but the article says earlier in the Lead "Viruses such as influenza are spread through the air by droplets of moisture when people cough or sneeze." But I'm happy to put the "such as" back in if you think it is an improvement; it's a trivial point and one not worth debating in my view. Best regards, Graham Beards (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed it to "Some virus infections, such as norovirus and rotavirus, are spread by contaminated food and water, by hands and communal objects, and by intimate contact with another infected person, while others like covid and influenza viruses are airborne." Graham Beards (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Immune system[edit]

Hello Graham! I am planning to (at least partially) tackle the exercise article, which is in a rather abyssmal state. I noticed the amount of coverage medical sources have regarding the immune system and exercise, and upon glossing over immune system, there weren't any mentions of exercise, physical activity etc., which is very surprising. Wouldn't it be wise to have a section dedicated to the effects of exercise, perhaps below the "Sleep and rest" section? I've found some great systematic reviews on the topic, and a few umbrella reviews mentioning it. I'd be happy to help out with creating such a section. Any thoughts? Cheers - Wretchskull (talk) 09:57, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes you are right. It is a serious omission. May I suggest we collaborate on a section? Graham Beards (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! I'm very busy today but I have plenty of time this weekend. I'll give you a notice when I'm ready! Search wherever you want and you'll stumble upon some great findings on this topic; Cochrane and PubMed seems like a good start, but I'm sure the refs you already used in immune system are also useful. Wretchskull (talk) 10:22, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm looking forward to a fruitful collaboration. Graham Beards (talk) 10:29, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again! I've picked a few sources here, mostly from a journal specialized in this topic (Exercize Immunology Review). I was wondering what the structure of such a section should be. Do you think we should have a paragraph explaining the technical microscopic changes and a paragraph below for its studied effects on infections, inflammation, cancer, etc.? Wretchskull (talk) 09:18, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, it's best if we only use reviews as these are compliant with WP:MEDRS. From a quick glance , I think I spotted some primary studies. Perhaps we should move our conversation to the article's Talk Page? That way others can pitch in. With regard to the section's structure, I suggest the heading "Effect of physical excercise" ( I think the article uses UK English, but I will have to check), followed by a section on the effects on innate immunity, one on adaptive immunity and, as you said, effects on disease course (but we must avoid primary studies). Thoughts? Best regards, Graham Beards (talk) 11:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Of course. I'll start working on its medical effects, but I would appreciate if you could help with innate/adaptive immunity as my knowledge in that topic is nowhere near as vast as an expert like yours. If I have any questions I'll use the article talk page from now on. By the way, regarding the sources, I was surprised when you said some were primary. I assume it's because it doesn't have the blue highlight with the word "review" on it (like this one)? The title of such sources contain the word "review", otherwise I wouldn't use them. All MEDRS sources I use are filtered by review, systematic review, or meta analysis. I might be missing something, though, and I'd be happy if you could correct me. Cheers - Wretchskull (talk) 13:47, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I hadn't looked at them closely. Graham Beards (talk) 14:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

A very happy Christmas and New Year to you!


Have a great Christmas, and may 2023 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from Krampus!

Cheers

SchroCat (talk) 11:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and lovely to hear from you. Best wishes, Graham. Graham Beards (talk) 13:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Graham_Beards/Archives/2022&oldid=1132816522"