User talk:GrampaScience

Discourse among editors[edit]

Hi, and welcome to the community of wikipedia editors! As I think you understand, wikipedia values the contributions of all editors making good faith efforts to improve our encyclopedia. We work together even when our points of view on a subject differ. In that context I wonder if you might reconsider your use on 7 May 2009 at 14:53 (UTC) of the phrase, "Point out what point in the missions Energia failed, or stop editing." Is discourse such as that consistent with your understanding of our policy? (sdsds - talk) 23:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of heavy lift launch systems[edit]

GrampaScience, do you agree with the current state of Energia launch statistics in the article "Comparison of heavy lift launch systems"? Please, answer on the corresponding talk page before "Arbitrary Section Break #2". I am collecting opinions whether the compromise is accepted by all parties or the issue should be escalated. Thanks. Gadinaaa (talk) 00:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Space reorganization[edit]

Hello WikiProject Space member! A discussion has been started regarding the future of WikiProject Space here; any comments you might have would be welcome! There are mainly two competing ideas:

Centralize all the Space-related WikiProjects, such as Astronomy and Spaceflight, and merge them into WikiProject Space, or
Separate the Astronomy and Spaceflight "sides" of WikiProject, and remove WikiProject Space.

If you can think of other options, that's great too. Your contribution to the discussion would be much appreciated. Thanks! :)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Space at 00:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Shenzhou 8 and the Chinese space station[edit]

Hi Grampa. You formerly made some edits, and Talk page comments, on Shenzhou 8. I have recently added some information to that article, and to the Chinese space station article from a very recent overview article (in English) by a long-time space journalist. If you are still interested in the topic, please feel free to come back to those articles and help improve them. Cheers. N2e (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tiangong 1[edit]

I opened a discussion about a new bot that user 'Z' and I have been working on, it's not ready for big things yet, but it can do some small tasks and I've outlined them on Talk:Tiangong 1. I would very much like you to comment if you have time, I saw you recently chatted on that talkpage and so I thought it may be worth asking you for input. Penyulap_talk 11:29, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

Thanks for helping with Paul Staines' article

Truthyness2 (talk) 11:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! But I'm going to stay back from that one for a moment. Space articles don't tend to have all this 'I disagree therefore vandalism!' rubbish. GrampaScience (talk) 11:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:23, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]