User talk:Gregwrites

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Gregwrites, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nathan asher and the infantry, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 19:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathan asher and the infantry[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nathan asher and the infantry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 19:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Nathan asher and the infantry. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A few words of advice on starting contributing to Wikipedia[edit]

My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Asher and the Infantry[edit]

  • Note: Normally it is best to answer a talk page message on the page where that message was posted, to prevent conversations from getting fragmented and difficult to follow. However, this time I am making an exception, and copying your message to me and answering it here. This is because what I am writing contains advice to you, and if you ever want to refer back to it then it will be more helpful to you on your talk page than buried in the archives of my talk page. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for advice on the Nathan Asher page. Truth is I just wanted to create a page I knew something about. It was not in any way promotional, as the band has been disbanded for at least eight years. I thought the sourcing was solid and written in the form of other bands on wikipedia. I don't know any one from the former band. I just used to listen to them years ago. I thought they deserved an entry, given their reach on the southeastern coast of America about a decade ago.

With that said, I hope you will look again at the page and see that it was not promotional and that it met the guidelines for a band.

Gregwrites (talk) 20:54, 29 May 2017 (UTC)Gregwrites[reply]

OK, I have had another look at the deleted article, and I will make a few comments which I hope may help you.
It is worth taking a little trouble to be clear about what the word "promotional" means in this context, because it is something which is very often misunderstood by new editors. Obviously, since the band no longer exists there can be no promotion in the commercial sense, but "promotional" can have a much wider range of meanings than that, and as far as Wikipedia is concerned anything which serves to try to persuade the reader that something is a good thing is promoting it. If someone were to write in the article Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart "Mozart was truly one of the greatest musicians who ever lived, and wrote music of a depth and power that has rarely if ever been surpassed", that would be viewed as promotional writing, and the fact that he has been dead for two and a quarter centuries and can't possibly benefit from the promotion does not alter that.
Language such as "The band combined poetic songwriting with a big-sound stage presence" is nowhere near as blatantly promotional as is quite often seen, but it does have a generally promotional feel to it. When it comes to things like "it's so cool to have Nathan Asher & the Infantry in our midst, a group that does not think small" and "a singer unafraid to reveal the deepest depths of himself in the most intense display of vocalizing emotion", you did put quotes round the text and attribute the views to particular commentators, rather than just saying those things as facts, but the fact remains that with or without quotes putting that sort of thing in an article tends to convey the unmistakable impression that the person writing the article wishes to make us fully aware of the good opinions that are held about the band, and when a fairly large proportion of a short article consists of laudatory prose such as those examples, the overall impression is strongly promotional.
I still recommend starting by making small improvements to existing articles and leaving the creation of new articles until you have more experience, but in case you still wish to go ahead with the article, I have restored it and moved it to Draft:Nathan Asher and the Infantry. You can work on it there, and if and when you think it is ready to become an article you can submit it for review by clicking on "Submit your draft for review!". An experienced editor will review the draft, and either accept it as an article or leave a message indicating what more needs to be done to it. This is a safer way for a new editor to write an article than creating one directly, because it is unlikely to be speedily deleted, unless it has really serious faults such as copyright infringement or libel.
Before you put any time into editing the draft, and in fact even before you decide whether you are going to edit it, you should look at Wikipedia's notability guidelines, if you haven't already done so. This is because if the band doesn't satisfy those guidelines then any article about them, no matter how well it may be written, is likely to be deleted, and obviously that would mean that all the work you put in would be lost. I don't know whether the band satisfies the guidelines or not, but the article as you wrote it certainly does not provide evidence that it does, so my advice is not to put more work in until you have checked. In my opinion there are far too many guidelines and policies in Wikipedia, and most of them are far too long and complex, making it difficult for a new editor to find his or her way around, but in this case the ones you most need to look at are the general notability guideline and Wikipedia:Notability (music). You should also have a look at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, and try to add references to more sources than the one you have given. Also, of course, you should think about what I said above about promotional editing, and consider rewriting in view of those comments.
I am also giving you a link to various policies, guidelines, and information pages which may be of use to you. Don't try to read and learn all of it, because, as I said above, there is far too much there, but read any bits that seem to be likely to be helpful to you, and of course you can always come back to other bits in the future if you need to. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello Gregwrites! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Miscellaneous

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing!

Draft:Nathan Asher and the Infantry concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nathan Asher and the Infantry, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nathan Asher and the Infantry[edit]

Hello, Gregwrites. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nathan Asher and the Infantry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TKK! bark with me! 23:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nathan Asher and the Infantry[edit]

Hello, Gregwrites. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nathan Asher and the Infantry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:49, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gregwrites&oldid=1142450166"