User talk:Gricehead/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Hello

Thank You for your edits at the Coupe de Francce but may you reduce this, because is to big. Ionel141 (talk) 16:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:2015–16 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2015–16 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds. Thanks! Flat Out (talk) 01:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2015–16 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds has been accepted

2015–16 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 08:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

2015–16 Coupe de France

I'm not really happy that you've reverted the changes I made to the team names and league levels on this page. I know that it doesn't match the "draw" section, but the names I put were the common names of the clubs involved which is surely more useful than the (randomly abbreviated) "full names" from the FFF website. The main gripe is with the numbering system though, which was changed to reflect the system used in all previous Coupe de France articles and is much easier to read. Thanks, BigDom (talk) 17:12, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

And you've removed many wikilinks that I added, which is pretty unfortunate. I'm taking this to WikiProject Football. BigDom (talk) 17:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

The links to non-existent pages are because the clubs in question are (likely to be) notable by our criteria for football clubs, and red links encourage authors to create the articles. It's easier to see a red link, click on it and start writing than to go looking for a page, find it doesn't exist, have to decide on a title, etc. BigDom (talk) 20:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Chris Burke (footballer) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Rotherdam United, F.C.

I repeat this from my talk page to be sure you get the message in the event you are not monitoring my talk page: The standard level 1 template for vandalism states that an edit "has been undone because it did not appear constructive." The level 1 template that I used for incorrect information states: "Your recent edit to the Article appears to have added incorrect information." I am not sure there is a great difference between the two. The template tag "incorrect information" v. "vandalism" is not visible unless the user opens the page to edit it and understands what he is looking at. Since this is the user's first edit and he has not made another edit, I doubt he will pay any attention to a change and may just wonder why there is a change to a similar message. Also, since the user has made no more edits, this may be a one-off. A warning of any sort often makes disruptive users cease. If he returns, the next warning could come from the vandalism templates in any event. If I see a second disruptive edit or vandalism from a user, I almost always use the vandalism template regardless of the one that was first used. I think many others who watch for vandalism do the same. The first template does not require a second from the same series. Since the first warning seems to have achieved the purpose of making the user stop and nothing is really gained by changing the template, I think the better choice is to leave the warning as it is. Thanks for your attention to this article and concern about its vandalism. Donner60 (talk) 00:15, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed you and others keep deleting the edit I did about Rotherham County playing in the top division during world war one. I see why it is being deleted but I feel like it is relevant information. If I mention that war time football statistics don't officially count will I be able to keep my edit. Thanks.

Thank you for supporting my RfA

	Brianhe RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating at my RfA. Your support was very much appreciated even if I did get a bit scorched. Brianhe (talk) 07:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 29 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Template:2015–16 Championnat de France amateur 2 Group G Table page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Note to self - this is the reference shared across two templates, that works in the main page but will be broken if someone uses just the Group G template.

ID Rotherham player

Hi, can you identify Rotherham United player on this photo? I think it might be Grant Ward, but I'm not 100% sure so I wanted to ask you. Dudek1337 (talk) 23:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that's Grant Ward. Gricehead (talk) 13:20, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Willll4

I'll keep an eye on him/them..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

I wouldn't be too hard on him, I think he's just an over-keen newbie...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

OneCoin = SCAM

The article OneCoin is not correct because it is misleading telling OneCoin is cryptocurrency - IT IS NOT. It has nothing to do with cryptocurrency and is no more than SCAM. And everyone can check it everywhere in the FREE internet: https://www.google.bg/search?q=onecoin&oq=onecoin&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2j69i59j69i60.855j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#newwindow=1&q=onecoin+scam http://cointelegraph.com/news/one-coin-much-scam-onecoin-exposed-as-global-mlm-ponzi-scheme — Preceding unsigned comment added by 30f3e3dfb4 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

@30f3e3dfb4:Hi. Wikipedia is about verifiable facts. WP:V is one of the pillars of Wikipedia, so you can't just write "it's a scam" without being able to back it up. If there are reliable sources that show OneCoin to be a scam, then you need to include them in the article when you edit it. Please read WP:RS for an explanation of what are considered reliable sources. Wikipedia is about verifiable facts, so you can't just right "it's a scam" without being able to back it up. Hope this helps. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 07:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Atlético Mineiro squad

Hello. I removed the players because I did not know about the WP:FOOTY consensus, I used to check first team squads in the Featured and Good articles of clubs, and I usually did not see youth players who were just selected for some matchdays among them. Another use (Joe Sins) has already readded them. Regards. Felipe Bini (talk) 15:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Fuck you

Go ahead tell the m to block me you snitch bitch and report me i fucked your bitch anyway hoe go suck a dick bitch on a corner and you better have my money hoe Mikeallenn10 (talk) 14:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Such a pleasant chap. Gricehead (talk) 14:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Player category list

Hello Gricehead. I'm not sure how you've done it, but you've changed the names of several clubs in the list of missing player categories. Would it be possible for you to fix it? Some of the links are redlinks now... Cheers, Number 57 16:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

No worries, thanks for sorting it out! Cheers, Number 57 23:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Marignane Gignac F.C. page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Free agent

If a player was released at the end of last season then I believe it is still acceptable to name their previous club in the "from club" section. Say for example if a player was released during last season then I would then say Free agent. --Skyblueshaun (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Yeah I reckon it should be discussed on WP:Footy. --Skyblueshaun (talk) 19:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the UJA Maccabi Paris Métropole page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 Rotherham United F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Ellison. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Really? Promotional content by referencing a resource so parents and students that end up on your wikipedia page looking for our website can't apply? You are horrid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.197.111.140 (talk) 14:34, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for all the work you've put into the Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds. :D Nobreadsticks (talk) 00:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks :) Gricehead (talk) 08:31, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gricehead. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Misclick

Sorry, finger slipped. DrKay (talk) 18:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 9 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2016–17 Rotherham United F.C. season page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Your comment on my edits for 2016–17 Coupe de France

Thanks for your comment on my editing of 2016–17 Coupe de France. I want to understand completely before going back to it. I was trying to capitalize important words in reference titles, not just proper nouns, and get rid of some ALLCAPS. These were apparently copied and pasted from the sources into the Wikipedia code. The links to the sources still work, but does French have different rules, so that only proper nouns in titles should be capitalized? Thanks again, and I'll try to fix it this evening if there are errors. Ira Leviton (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

I just saw your reply about changing titles from one acceptable form to another acceptable form – you're correct, and I now I realize that when I was fixing mispellings, ALLCAPS, and words that should have been capitalized, I simply got carried away with my personal preference. My apologies, and I'll try to control myself next time :) I will go back and change them this evening. Ira Leviton (talk) 15:31, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

thanks for doing so much for wikipedia

Minerbraden (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited French football league system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Var. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

michael ihiekwe

So because Michael Ihiekwe signs for rotherham Colin you come in vandalising factual good natured banter and actually erasing details of what was a massive pivotal moment in the 2017 National league championship! You werent even bothered about this page before today i have no doubt but in some respects its you doing the vandalism here. You of course would have known nothing of the national league supporting Rotherham, maybe you should do some homework before arrogantly erasing things! http://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/football/rotherham-united/rotherham-united-things-you-might-not-know-about-millers-new-boy-michael-ihiekwe-1-8562965 (POINT 8!!!!!!)

Hi @2a02:c7f:da51:5b00:44e6:d1b6:99e5:e096:. Your edit to Michael Ihiekwe was sourced only to Twitter, which should be avoided unless all the criteria at WP:SELFPUB are met. It also contained Original Research (Ihiekwe was inspirational to Lincoln with his premature taunt and will probably go down in history as a don't presume anything moment. which is not allowed by policy. The fact that it was inserted at the end of a section about the 2014–15 season made it appear more as vandalism, but it would have been a revertable edit without these points. Wikipedia is not the place for banter. It is the place for verifiable facts.

Your statement about me knowing nothing about national league football and needing to do my homework is a Personal Attack that you should avoid in future. Comment on content is fine, commenting personally about the contributor is not.

That said, if you were to include a completely factual statement, based on the source you quoted above, in the right place in the article, it would have more chance of sticking. I wouldn't revert it.

I have, however, reverted your edit again based on the first paragraph above. Please do not re-revert. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 07:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

So the daily star AND the official non league papers journalist are not factual sources combined? I think you are being over zelous here. Are you trying to imply this wasnt said, this wasnt an important part of the season and for whatever reason erasing it because you dont like it? Its been and actually still is a massive part of banter between us and Lincoln fans and even michael jokes about it

Hi again. You are using Twitter as a source, which is not allowed. I don't deny it was said, but you cannot source to twitter. I am taking this to the WP:ANEW noticeboard now. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 08:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

So i removed the self publication and twitter , quoted to the facts published by a reputable daily newspaper surely thats a good enough resolution? You may feel it a negative influence on a personal level. You yourself admit it was said and now the facts are edited that should be ok i used twitter AND the daily star so why are you ignoring the reference from there focusing only on twitter?

The "reputable daily newspaper" which you quoted is not The Daily Star national paper, but the Sheffield Star local rag. I can pretty much guarantee they sourced that piece from your text on wikipedia, but of course I can't prove that. Your edit as it stands may be fine - it's certainly an improvement - it's up to others to assess that now. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 09:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

GC_5

Thanks for the tips looks like your a sports fan like me particularly Rotherham United.

Thanks GC_05. UTM

GC 5 (talk) 15:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gricehead. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Kévin Diaz (footballer, born 1983)

Because he joined the club in 2013 but the stats are only from 2015 onwards - so not accurate. GiantSnowman 17:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Saying he had X goals in X games since 2013 is not correct, is it? GiantSnowman 18:28, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Blank simply means his stats are unknown - which is correct. GiantSnowman 09:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Re: Amanda Reid

Hey, yeah I noticed that edit as well ... I was going to let it go because the cat addition was unsourced. But I've just found a source, so ... let the fun begin. Graham87 08:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gricehead. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 April 20.
Message added 11:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Response on 2018 CdF

Well thanks for the response. Actually I want someone to count the amount of matches and goals scored, because it seems not updated. Especially in the last season article. I count there are 198 matches (instead of 195) on this season, while last "stopped" on 63. Do you want to help to fix? Thanks. – Flix11 (talk) 12:58, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

File:C'Chartres Football logo.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SO Romorantin New Crest.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SO Romorantin New Crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Re: Amanda Reid

Just ... wow. Thanks for letting me know. Graham87 01:21, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gricehead. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

2018–19 Coupe de France

What is 'wrong' with their edits exactly? GiantSnowman 16:09, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Got you - I've asked them to use the talk page. GiantSnowman 19:53, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your help with my previous edits, I am relatively new to editing and your helpful comments and changes keep me on the straight and narrow. As a fellow miller myself, its rare to see a Rotherham Supporter actually doing something good for the community, and for that I am very grateful. Keep making the world a better place! Dobbo02 (talk) 16:57, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Bastia-Borgo club crest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Bastia-Borgo club crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Le Mans squad

Hello. Noticed your changes to the squad template, and was wondering what's happened to Victor Simon? He's disappeared from the Soccerway squad list, which generally means he's gone elsewhere, but I can't find anything to confirm? cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

@Struway2: He's still at the club, but only seems to be playing for the second team in Championnat National 3. Apart from one substitute appearance in December when he wore shirt 33, which isn't a normal squad number, per LFP regulations: All teams must have an unattributed jersey numbered 33 reserved for last minute replacements (LFP) Competitions Regulations, part 1, title 4, chapter 2, article 562 Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 18:28, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, wasn't aware of the #33 thing. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi. Thanks for cleaning up after me at a bunch of French footballer articles. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

2019–20 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: Sorry, I got pulled away last night before I could add the actual data with references that I had. I have now done this, for the information currently available. Can you move back to article space please? (Or can I? Not sure if that's allowed). First matches in the competition are this weekend, so I'd prefer the article not to get lost at the bottom of the AFC queue. Thanks, Gricehead (talk) 09:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Griehead, Greetings to you. 2 of the sources you provided are WP:PRIMARY (fro ffff as it associated with the subject) sources which can NOT be used to contribute to the notability of the article. Can you find other sources, such as from major newspapers (independent, reliable sources) about the league instead? If not then wait until this weekend when the competition started that would have sources available to add in. Let me know when you have found the them and added in and I will review for you. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

@CASSIOPEIA: Yeah, I take your point. I doubt there'll be any secondary coverage of the first round (finding any coverage online for the smaller French overseas territories is... challenging). There's no doubting the notability of the competition, and it will start getting coverage later on and when the mainland competitions start. It's going to be a shame not to be able to have this information on wiki until then. The competition is analagous to the English FA Cup, which never has any problems getting articles for it's qualification rounds up, despite having the same secondary sources issues for at least the first month. Gricehead (talk) 09:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Gricehead, I understand you points; however, a page is merit in Wikipedia needs to satisfy the notability requirements where by the subject needs to be talked about by secondary independent sources, if not then it is WP:TOOSOON. If the subject is notable, and equivalent to English FA Cup then it would not be a problem to find those sources. Do note sources could be in any languages. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:02, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

2019–20 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, Overseas departments and territories moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2019–20 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, Overseas departments and territories, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Will Vaulks

I'm INVOLVED so can't do anything, but I've amended the intro to remove the nationality (as is standard for these cases). If he never plays Wales we can re-add English. Probably worth you making a request at WP:RFPP though. GiantSnowman 14:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Drafts

 Done - User:Gricehead/2019–20 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds and User:Gricehead/2019–20 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds, Overseas departments and territories. GiantSnowman 14:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Note

Hi there, from Portugal,

regarding your follow-up message in my talkpage (much appreciated), I note that I immediately replied the other user after their request (on their page), and I think I got it more or less right. Did not receive any reply whatsoever.

Attentively, happy editing --Quite A Character (talk) 09:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

2019–20 Coupe de France Preliminary Rounds

Hi Gricehead,

I read your message today, I'm happy to work with you, but I can't create all boxes cause it's too long.

(Juste pour l'information je suis français (de Bretagne précisément) , donc je parle français et j'ai remarqué que vous savez parler français, donc si vous avez le moindre renseignement, envoyez-moi un message sur ma page utilisateur, et j'y répondrai le plus tôt possible)

Cheers and see you soon

--Combres Rayan (talk) 14:22, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help copy edit and improvements for article. Thanks you. 58.187.77.36 (talk) 09:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Stade Poitevin FC

 Done GiantSnowman 09:55, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:French Championnat National 2 football league logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:French Championnat National 2 football league logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Trevor Clarke

No, I don't have a draft on Clarke and no intention to start one. I've restored the article. GiantSnowman 10:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Red Bull Bragantino managers

A tag has been placed on Category:Red Bull Bragantino managers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:10, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Andrezieux-Boutheon FC club crest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andrezieux-Boutheon FC club crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:C'Chartres Football logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:C'Chartres Football logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Balagne logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Balagne logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hyeres FC logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hyeres FC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:IC Croix club crest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IC Croix club crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Jeuness

Soccerway -> [1], globalsportsarchive.com -> [2], but it seems that on the federation of Guadeloupe appears as JEUNESSE EVOLUTION F.C. -> [3]. Move it to Jeuness Evolucion FC if you want. Rhinen

Bunch of orphaned image notifications, caused by another editor uploading a new version.

Orphaned non-free image File:Stade Bordelais Logo.jpeg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Stade Bordelais Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Stade Poitevin FC logo.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Stade Poitevin FC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Vierzon FC club crest.jpg ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:Vierzon FC club crest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Gricehead! You created a thread called Question regarding orphaned fair use images at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Don't feed the trolls

Just wanted to say and warn you not to feed the trolls, they get fat when they know they are getting attention, best bet it too ignore them, and come back to the nest to clear it out later!!! Govvy (talk) 11:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Re: Your recent block of Mlopezer

Hey, yeah I remember you from the Amanda Reid page. Adding unneeded links to completely random articles is a common pattern for disruptive editors to inflate their edit counts ... I can't find a source for that but I've seen it and heard of it many times. The misleading edit summaries aren't a good sign, either. Maybe the block is a bit harsh but indef is not infinite ... if they do turn out to be a good editor and not disruptive/paid, they can always be unblocked. Graham87 10:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Turkish IP

Two options dealing with a disruptive IP hopper - request a range block or request page protection. You can do that at WP:ANI / WP:RFPP respectively. GiantSnowman 07:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Gobelins.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Gobelins.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:French Championnat National 3 football league logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:French Championnat National 3 football league logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

AS Muret

Hi there. AS Muret was just moved to draftspace (Draft:AS Muret) due to lack of inline references. I've been having trouble finding secondary sources covering the club's history. You seem to be very experienced with French lower-league clubs. Would you be able to help? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Wow, great job! Thank you very much. :-) I'll submit the draft for review. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:07, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

I added some content about the club's Coupe de France exploits. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:25, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

The article has now been published. 🎉 Thanks again for your help, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

MDA Foot

I can't find conversation about MDA Foot but thanks for letting me know about change - I thought it was vandalism. And yes their main article should definitely be updated. Thanks again. Rupert1904 (talk) 15:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RC Grasse logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RC Grasse logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wendell Maksinczuk Ortega

The article Wendell Maksinczuk Ortega has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about semi-pro footballer which fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 17:32, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Wendell Maksinczuk Ortega for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wendell Maksinczuk Ortega is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wendell Maksinczuk Ortega until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jogurney (talk) 21:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

	The original barnstar
	Hello. I am sending you this barnstar as I would like to compliment you on your commitments for the articles on Coupe de France and French Minor Football Dr Salvus (talk) 07:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Dealing with good faith but poor editors

I think WP:CIR applies... GiantSnowman 21:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Football Barnstar
		Thank you for helping sort out those hoax footy ones in the stale userspace drafts. Keep up the great work! :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

US Torcy

Hi there. I've seen many articles of French players state they have played for a club called "US Torcy". Do you think it would meet the notability guidelines if it were created? Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on: They're well known for their youth football, up to U19 level, and as you say they have produced their fair share of big names. The first team haven't achieved anything of note, their highest level being National 3 in 2019-20 (I personally use National 2 as the lowest bar for league notability, as otherwise the volume of articles is crazy). Of course, by the letter of the law of football notability, they are notable due to competing in the Coupe de France, but they've not had any late-tournament success. It wouldn't be top of my to-do list, but might be worth a stub to see if it gets thrown to AFD. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 09:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. That's very helpful. I think I'll give it a shot. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@Robby.is.on: Looks good! I've added to List of football clubs in France. Can I ask that if you create more French football club articles you either add them to that list article, or drop me a message? It's pretty much impossible to find them otherwise (When I remember I search article creations of editors I know, but I don't often remember!) Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 11:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! I have no immediate plans to create more – this is only my second club article overall – but I'll try my best to remember that when I do. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)