User talk:Gricharduk
|
|
Celebration![edit]
|
Celebration~! |
| Wikipedia turns 20 today! Hope you are doing well and have a prosperous onwiki experience in the future. Once again, congrats for the GA. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 03:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Beryl May Dent[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Beryl May Dent you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hawkeye7 That's fantastic. Thank you very much for reviewing Beryl May Dent - I really enjoyed writing about her. I really appreciate you taking the time and effort to review the article. I have addressed the comments at the top of the review - all really good points. Have a great day, Gricharduk (talk) 06:14, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Beryl May Dent[edit]
The article Beryl May Dent you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Beryl May Dent for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Sidney Hill[edit]
On 20 February 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sidney Hill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that philanthropist Sidney Hill began a new life in England as a gentleman farmer, adding stables to the estate, a dairy and Langford Bullock Palaces for his prized shorthorn cattle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sidney Hill. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sidney Hill), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Writer's Barnstar |
| For an extremely well-written and researched biography of Dulcie Mary Pillers. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Hello.
Thank you for contributing to my Wiki-Page "Sheiks of Siraj-ud-Din. It is greatly appreciated. Kind Regards Rodrigo Ottomanhistoria (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Jane Ingham[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jane Ingham you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eewilson -- Eewilson (talk) 09:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jane Ingham[edit]
The article Jane Ingham you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Jane Ingham for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Eewilson -- Eewilson (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, great job, and keep up the good work![edit]
|
The Bio-star | |
| Gricharduk, Thank you for the article about Jane Ingham. Not only did it hone my review skills, I learned about a fascinating woman biologist and got to work with a responsive and intelligent nominator. You took this article from non-existent to GA this year, which is an amazing feat! Great job, and I hope we get to work together again. Eewilson (talk) 07:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC) |
Hi, Eewilson, Thank you very much and what a lovely person you are. None of the above would have been possible without your thorough review, editing, advice, and hard work. I consider you joint author of the article as you improved it so much during the review. It has been a joy to work with you and you have taught me so much over the last week. Wikipedia is very lucky to have you. Have a great day, Gricharduk (talk) 08:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Grichard, Thank you! I will take a bit of credit, but you have been the one who took on this project and ran with it. You are now the Tupper-Carey expert. I only know the bare minimum! Eewilson (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
"Topicons"[edit]
Hi, Gricharduk! Did you know that you can put a topicon on your userpage for each of your good articles, DYKs, and featured articles? Just a nice little way to reward yourself and brag a bit. See Template:GA user topicon, Template:DYK user topicon, and Template:FA user topicon. —Eewilson (talk) 07:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Eewilson Thank you very much. No, I did not know about this template (there is so much I don't know) so I am going to add this to my userpage. Gricharduk (talk) 08:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Jane Ingham[edit]
On 10 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jane Ingham, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the English botanists Jane Ingham and Joseph Hubert Priestley were the first to separate cell walls from meristematic tissues in broad beans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jane Ingham. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jane Ingham), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
TFA blurb quick review[edit]
Hi, Gricharduk! Symphyotrichum lateriflorum has achieved FA status, and I have nominated it to be on the main page in a Today's Featured Article. A few people need to read the blurb and make suggestions if needed, and Support or Oppose, whichever applies. Would you be willing to take a look at the blurb, make any suggestions, comment if you have any, etc.? It is at this link: Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Symphyotrichum lateriflorum. Eewilson (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Morning Eewilson, of course! I will take a look now (it's a fantastic article). Sorry for my recent lack of communication, my current work project is getting in the way of what I love most - editing here :) I hope you are well, Gricharduk (talk) 05:45, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you! Internet outages are affecting me. Random cable modem/router reboots that began on Tuesday when Comcast, our ISP, had an outage in various areas across the nation. I suspect they are sending out packets that my "older" modem doesn't like. It's very annoying. :) Eewilson (talk) 07:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024[edit]
 
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]
- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)