User talk:GuTTy-YC

Please stop adding nonsense information in the article Panda (band). You don't have sources, and you know it. "Apestan.com" is not a trust source. --Coraje (talk) 17:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Un club de fans de MCR en México ¿eh? Aprovechando que tú también eres culto deberías de saber que en un club de fans todos van a defender a su artista y van a poner cualquier información por tal de apoyarlo. Sólo se te pide que aportes una fuente válida, como un periódico de trascendencia, una sitio de noticias confiable o algo similar. ¿Es mucho pedir? Bueno, para ti sí es mucho, ya que no creo que lo encuentres, por que dichos "plagios" son sólo subjetivos y una demanda imaginaria. --Coraje (talk) 18:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lo de "some people believe" es una frase vaga, cosa no admitida en la wikipedia en español, sin embargo, no sé si está permitido en la wikipedia en inglés pues nunca se me había presentado un caso como éste. Prometo investigar. Saludos. --Coraje (talk) 18:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Panda (band). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Don chuck norris.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Don chuck norris.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR Violation[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Disculpa los malos pensamientos. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to the following pages: Panda (band). Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have been noted here. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 19:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article, as you did to Panda (band), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:Ioeth#Prove of panda's plagearism[edit]

None of the links that you provided are reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy explicitly states that all content additions must be accompanied with reliable sources to prove that the information is correct, especially in the case of potentially defamatory additions. Again, the links you have are not reliable sources. If you are unsure of whether your sources are reliable or not, please suggest the content addition with the sources you are providing on the article's talk page before adding it into the article. For more information about what reliable sources are and how to properly cite them, please see WP:RS. For the details of Wikipedia's verifiability policy, please see WP:V. Thank you. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 19:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Staring Back[edit]

A tag has been placed on Staring Back requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Travis ^talk 03:29, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Chemical Romance[edit]

Your recent edit to My Chemical Romance has been reverted because it is considered vandalism. Please do not remove notices and completely ignore them. If you continue to make unconstructive edits, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. ╦ﺇ₥₥€Ԋ(^talk/_contribs) 21:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't explain more, but you removed the notice that said not to change the genres before starting a talk page discussion. It doesn't matter if it's true or not. The notice was put there so edit warring over the genres wouldn't occur again. If you want the genres you put up to stay, you need to provide reliable sources for them. And as for Yellowcard, you keep inserting false information. Josh Portman is from Near Miss not Staring Back. Also, for this edit, if you want it to stay, you need sources. Thank you and happy holidays. ╦ﺇ₥₥€Ԋ(^talk/_contribs) 03:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emo[edit]

Do not change the content at Emo. The lits of bands is fixed - consensus has been established that the list should not be changed without discussion. There is a note explaining this, and I told you in the edit summary when I reverted you, but you did it again. Please respect consensus and do not edit war. --Cheeser1 (talk) 07:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liks[edit]

Wikipedia is not a repository of links to fan sites or forums, so don't add those links to the article...--Comet styles 11:23, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Yellowcard. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gwernol 13:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to Avril Lavigne has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ ^echo 13:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]