User talk:Gunnar.Kaestle

--DV8 2XL 09:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Edit to Kilowatt hour

Your contributions suggest you know a great deal about electric power. It may very well be that the electrical power engineers you deal with usually write the symbol "kWh". But an encyclopedia article about a unit is aimed at people who are not familiar with the unit. For such people it is more helpful to use symbols that follow the same pattern for all SI, "kW⋅h", rather than a special exception that only applies to this one unit. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

"kWh" hour is the usual kind of writing 1000 times Watt times hour. kWh is also a quite widespread units which you find on your electricity bills. The dot is not needed and artificially divides the kilowatthour. --Gunnar (talk) 13:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

web host provider block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gunnar.Kaestle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption, because it obviously probhibits me to participate in the improvement of Wikipedia. Please consult with my provider Deutsche Telekom, about IP misuse issues. Gunnar (talk) 13:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No active blocks - Please see WP:IPEC for instructions on how to request IP Block Exemption. SQL^{Query me!} 15:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are not currently able to edit, move, or create them.

Editing from 178.162.128.0/17 has been blocked (disabled) by DeltaQuad for the following reason(s): Wikipedia Checkuser.svgCheckUser evidence has determined that this IP address or network has been used (not necessarily by you) to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse. If you get this message, please read the following information. Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block a range of IP addresses or an entire network, to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These "range blocks" can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block. IP users (without an account): If you do not currently have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. Please use this form to request an account under your preferred username. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. If using the form, please refer to this block under "comments". If e-mailing, please refer to this block in your message.

Registered users (with an account): Please ensure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block without consulting a CheckUser. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Server-multiple.svgThe IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host provider. Since the web host acts like a proxy, because it hides your IP address, it has been blocked. To prevent abuse, these IPs may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

If you do not believe you are using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gunnar.Kaestle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. Place any further information here. Gunnar (talk) 22:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It appears that you are editing from a web host. Please use your normal ISP and you should be able to edit without difficulty. Mike V • Talk 22:57, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you are using a Wikipedia account you will need to request an IP block exemption by either using the unblock template or by submitting an appealing using the unblock ticket request system. If you wish to keep your IP address private you can email the functionaries team.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block has been set to expire: 16:26, 20 October 2019.

Even if blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page and email other editors and administrators.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gunnar.Kaestle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. The ISP I use is Deutsche Telekom, and I am not using it's web hosting, but IP connection. This is the only ISP I have. Gunnar (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No active blocks - Please see WP:IPEC for instructions on how to request IP Block Exemption, as suggested above. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Ecodynamics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ecodynamics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecodynamics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gunnar.Kaestle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of COGIX

The article COGIX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winged Blades ^Godric 16:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

How to cite sources

There is a guide to citing sources here: Wikipedia:Citing sources. But I reverted your edit to Kilowatt hour because Yahoo Answers is not a reliable source. Reliable sources are described here: WP:RS. Also there is a discussion on the article talk page concerning the necessity of the "cn" tag, and you may want to join the discussion. Kendall-K1 (talk) 10:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gunnar.Kaestle. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Equivalence number method

The article Equivalence number method has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, apparently translated from a German Wikipedia article, no clear claim of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:33, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gunnar.Kaestle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mochovce Nuclear Power Plant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Julien Abraham

Hello, Gunnar.Kaestle,

Thank you for creating Julien Abraham.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Might want to consider moving this page to your WP:SANDBOX instead of the mainspace to avoid deletion since you've included no references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:07, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Actually IMDB was linked from the very beginning, but I added an additional reference. --Gunnar (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Micro combined heat and power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Combustion engine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Fixed --Gunnar (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Would you be able to take a look at Greenhouse gas emissions by Turkey?

Hello Gunnar,

I see you are very knowledgeable about climate change. As I am trying to improve Greenhouse gas emissions by Turkey to FA standard would you be able to read it and point out what could be better? Even if you don't have much time I am sure you will be able to quickly spot at least one or two areas for improvement which I have missed.

Regards

Chidgk1 (talk) 09:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

@Chidgk1: If you want to use some data, I recommend this source on historical CO2 emissions (country specific): https://folk.universitetetioslo.no/roberan/GCB2020.shtml --Gunnar (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Ah thanks for your changes and that link - interesting I had not seen a Kaya identity graph before. I think when I put the article in for FA there will be plenty of comments on the grammar so I don't need to take up your time with that, but have you any comments on the technical side? For example have I presented any tech info in a misleading way? If so please could you drop me a note on Talk:Greenhouse gas emissions by Turkey Chidgk1 (talk) 11:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Open a dispute about your edits

Hello, I'm 206.45.2.52. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ukraine on Fire have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 206.45.2.52 (talk) 16:15, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

You should stop your vandalism and use the Talk page to discuss the content of given paragraphs. --Gunnar (talk) 23:12, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Igor Lopatonok

The article Igor Lopatonok has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Igor Lopatonok moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Igor Lopatonok, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mooonswimmer 20:52, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Igor Lopatonok moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Igor Lopatonok, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I've moved this back to drafts, because otherwise it would have been likely taken to AfD. When I moved it, it had only one valid source (IMDb not being accepted as reliable); I can see that as I was moving it, you added another source, but that still leaves the referencing rather weak. For example his personal/family details are only supported by IMDb, which isn't acceptable in a BLP article. Please ensure that notability is properly established, and all material statements fully supported by reliable sources, before publishing this. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:16, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

cf. "Marina Lopatonok." Biographies.net. STANDS4 LLC, 2022. Web. 14 Jun 2022. <https://www.biographies.net/biography/marina-lopatonok/m/0hzgjnx>. --Gunnar (talk) 05:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Trump didn't win the 2020 elections ...

... and the Revolution of Dignity was no coup. I kindly asked you to stop flooding my user's talk page with pro-war propaganda. You didn't respect that demand. Claiming that U.S. involvement in that revolution was one of the reasons the Russians boiled over is pro-war propaganda and is hateful to me personally, not least because four of Putin's (not "the Russians'") victims are now studying in my class. Learn how to find good sources at WP:RS (I especially recommend section 4), read Andreas Kappeler and Serhii Plokhy, and listen to Timothy Snyder's lectures before going to my talk page again. Rsk6400 (talk) 16:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Well, some say that the Maidan revolution was a coup, where people were killed on both sides [1], and some say it wasn't. Let's wait until the historians find out after they had access to the secret archives to choose a final answer. By the way, dignity is defined as "a calm and serious manner that deserves respect" [2]. I don't believe that this includes a violent uprising with many killings. --Gunnar (talk) 16:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

This is in line with your comment but in social sciences like history where we still are in the process of putting pieces of the puzzle together at Ukraine on Fire. Please let me say that I as a historian feel that you are wrong. And I also think that you are depreciating the work of social scientists. It is not "we" who are "putting pieces ... together", but academics. And I think we should (and can) trust that they know their jobs and the limits of their knowledge. I don't think that you should compare real experts on Ukraine (like Kappeler or e.g. Karl Schlögel) with all those people you mentioned. That was the opinion of a historian, but we also have a rule on WP, which is neutrally reporting what reliable sources say, without OR. Rsk6400 (talk) 07:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Let me just point that with "we" I often mean the whole of mankind. By the way, the special class of historians which are experts in classical antiquity may have less know-how in contemporary history. For instance, it took only a few days for The Nation to comment on the leaked phone call between Nuland and Pyatt: "In the course of a little over four minutes, the two American diplomats exchange ideas about who ought to be promoted, and who ought to be demoted, by the United States inside Ukraine, which is suffering through a difficult and even violent political dispute over whether Ukraine will tilt east, toward Russia, or west, toward the United States and Europe. [..] As if it’s any of her business, Nuland says" Yatseniuk should go in and Klitschko shall stay out. Can you tell me how the historians you prefer interpret this conversation? --Gunnar (talk) 13:33, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

About putting pieces together: In Operation Ajax you can read the sentence: "In August 2013, the U.S. government formally acknowledged the U.S. role in the coup by releasing a bulk of previously classified government documents that show it was in charge of both the planning and the execution of the coup, including the bribing of Iranian politicians, security and army high-ranking officials, as well as pro-coup propaganda." In this case it took 60 years for putting the pieces together. There may have been different theories and some evidence available in the decades directly following the event, but the clear picture only became visible after public access to the archives was granted. --Gunnar (talk) 13:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

The mentality (and also the rules) here at the English WP are a bit different from those of the German WP. Since you are a very productive editor at the German WP, I have no doubt that you are acting in good faith, but your edit warring at Ukraine on Fire still could lead to a block if you continue. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

As you refer most probably to the improvement of the synopsis of a film, I can only state that I see it as a kind of vandalism, if you revert without giving some good reasoning the changes. --Gunnar (talk) 13:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)