User talk:HM211980

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing; we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Top Gun, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. BilCat (talk) 04:40, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Palisades Charter High School. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Manway (talk) 02:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to What's the Frequency, Kenneth?, you will be blocked from editing. Dudesleeper talk 22:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Such an assertion needs to be sourced. Either find a source for it or I will revert it soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Bzzzt. Incorrect. Such an assertion needs to be tagged with a citation request. A single isn't a human being, so your line of following WP:BLP is an erroneous one. - Dudesleeper talk 23:18, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do stop edit-warring. Make your edit, and if people disagree, don't revert, because you really have had enough warnings already, even if you've removed them from your talk. Enigma^msg 00:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I will edit as I see fit, as long as it's within policy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit-warring is not within policy, especially as you've been warned against it countless times. Enigma^msg 07:15, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Then quit doing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 16:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

This is not some big joke. You're the one doing it, not me, and you know that. Enigma^msg 17:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

You do it as well. I should know, because I've been the victim of it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Don't lie. I have not and especially not with you. Also, you are the perpetrator here, not the victim. Enigma^msg 19:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

"You have not, and especially not with me." Somewhat contradictory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

←Not what I said. I said I haven't. Enigma^msg 21:37, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, you have. Don't lie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

No I have not. You're the one lying here. Enigma^msg 00:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Top Gun. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 02:13, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to McDonald's, you may be blocked from editing. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 06:26, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Top Gun. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 03:41, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

You appear to be unable to differentiate between editing and vandalism. Rossovich was in the movie, and he is listed as starring in the movie on the Top Gun page. If you would like to experiment, please use the Wikipedia:Sandbox. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 01:09, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Top Gun, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. BilCat (talk) 01:09, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Not vandalism. And you can cut out the threats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

It's not a "threat". You will be reported for vandalism if you continue this pattern of disruptive editing, and an admim will decide if you should be blocked. - BilCat (talk) 01:28, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Your "disruptive" equals my "editing". Take a hike. I'll edit as I see fit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 01:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

I would ask you provide a reliable souces that shows Rossovich had second billing in the movie, but I already know better - I've seen the movie. So please be WP:CIVIL, or you may earn yourself an even longer block. - BilCat (talk) 02:02, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

+1. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 10:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to What's the Frequency, Kenneth?, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --CliffC (talk) 03:55, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely for generally being a dick. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator. For alternative methods to appeal, see Wikipedia:Appealing a block. Daniel Case (talk) 13:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Just proof that if one has a difference of opinion than an Administrator, or a complainer, you get blocked. That is why wiki articles aren't viewed as credible sources. Not a surprise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HM211980 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)