User talk:HMAS onslow

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, HMAS onslow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 19:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barbados air wing[edit]

The article Barbados air wing has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chetsford (talk) 01:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Montenegrin Air Force[edit]

PLEASE STOP changing or removing reliably sourced, content as you have done on the Montenegrin Air Force article. If you continue these disruptive actions you may be permanently blocked from editing - FOX 52 (talk) 03:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!--ז62 (talk) 19:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! --ז62 (talk) 16:00, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Ilyushin Il-38, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:17, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Piper PA-18 Super Cub, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 01:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Air Comores[edit]

The article Air Comores has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — IVORK _Discuss 02:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ivory Coast air force[edit]

Hello HMAS onslow,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ivory Coast air force for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:47, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taliban air force moved to Draft:Taliban air force[edit]

Hi , Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Taliban air force has been moved to Draft:Taliban air force. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

reliable source - see WP:RS
primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
verification - see WP:V
notability - see WP:N
webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:35, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air force of Burkina Faso, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MI-4 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Seychelles Peoples Air Force[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Seychelles Peoples Air Force. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Seychelles_People's_Defence_Force#Air_Force. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Seychelles_People's_Defence_Force#Air_Force. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — IVORK _Discuss 02:16, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Biafran air force[edit]

A tag has been placed on Biafran air force requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://weaponsandwarfare.com/2015/10/12/nigerian-civil-war-air-war/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:26, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved page War Museum, Umuahia to Nigerian War Museum without leaving a redirect: Naming convention[edit]

Howdy, moved your page to conform with Wikipedia naming convention in regards to having place names in titles, if you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on my talk page — IVORK _Discuss 01:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Gambian army Air Force[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Gambian army Air Force. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Gambian Air Force. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gambian Air Force. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Petebutt (talk) 14:34, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Biafra into Biafran Armed forces. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NSS Bonny[edit]

The article NSS Bonny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 08:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, having myself found a source which mentions the ship, I've removed the PROD. But please take more care when editing Wikipedia. This ship is the "NNS Bonny", not the "NSS Bonny" and the Nigerian War Museum is at Umuahia and not Umaha. The source you provided, http://www.marinavasca.eu/en/ficha-otras-marinas-auxiliares.php?id=49&o= , does not appear to mention this ship. Adding inaccurate articles to the encyclopedia is not constructive. Thanks. PamD 20:56, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Real nonsense[edit]

Please dont you ever make up things as you did here. Adding a picture of old aircraft from the Museum of Aviation, Belgrade (Belgade is in Serbia you know? Not in Bosnia), with planes with clear isignia of the Air Force of Serbia and Montenegro, and using the picture which clearly indicated that in the file information, and saying it is "Some Bosnian J-21s in a scrapyard"... No comments... Just check you facts first please and dont add wrong information as such was. Regards, FkpCascais (talk) 04:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!--ז62 (talk) 14:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Uruguayan Naval Air Wing[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Uruguayan Naval Air Wing. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – National_Navy_of_Uruguay#Uruguayan_Naval_Aviation. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at National_Navy_of_Uruguay#Uruguayan_Naval_Aviation. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. RetroCraft314 (talk) 00:58, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Liberian Army Air Wing) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Liberian Army Air Wing, HMAS onslow!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 12:00, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2)[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sovereign Military Order of Malta to Military Corps of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (your addition has since been removed, because there's nothing in the new article that was not copied from the source article). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:23, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Cuban Revolutionary Navy) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Cuban Revolutionary Navy, HMAS onslow!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Micronesia[edit]

Please do not create defence force articles when defence forces do not exist. Add the material about the mobile, air, or naval sections to the relevant Law enforcement in the Federated States of Micronesia etc article. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:08, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of former communist and socialist states[edit]

Hi HMAS onslow, Greetings to you. Please note that Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR. Pls find the source and recite for the article above. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:37, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove warning templates[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Stop removing warning templates, and review wikipedia's reference requirements, please. Buckshot06 (talk) 02:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Malagasy Air Force, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Guinea-Bissau Air Force, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 02:50, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Costa Rican Military Air Force[edit]

Hi, I'm Lovkal. HMAS onslow, thanks for creating Costa Rican Military Air Force!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please clarify what conflict Costa Rica and Nicaragua was involved in. Link to the correct article describing the conflict.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

lovkal (talk) 07:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What invasion?[edit]

Hi. Please clarify what "invasion" you're referring to in Costa Rican Military Air Force and bluelink to the relevant article, thanks. lovkal (talk) 07:28, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Costa Rican Military Air Force, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Air Operations Element of the Papua New Guinea Defence Force - inline citations needed[edit]

Hi HMAS onslow, Greetings to you. As per my previous message to you, this article of your faces with same problem which you need to provide inline citation (source) to for verification of the content claim.

Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs needs "inline citation" from independent "third party" reliable source (in any language)  for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records  are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing.  Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press).  (Note: Wikipedia  can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR).

citing from internet source - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Instructions: Citing source from web - Do not copy and past the URL address and paste into the body text, but click "cite" on menu page and fill in the fields as per the Template: cite web and save when it is done). Examples below:

To add an in-line text citation for an internet reference: <ref>{{cite web|url =https://www.mmafighting.com/2018/4/5/17203890/watch-conor-mcgregor-throw-a-dolly-through-ufc-223-fighter-bus-window |title = Watch Conor McGregor throw a dolly through UFC 223 fighter bus window|accessdate = 15 April 2018|author=|last =Al-Shatti |first = Shaun |publication = mmafighting|date = 15 April 2018|archivedate =15 April 2018 }}</ref>
To add an in-line text citation for a paper reference: <ref name="Green">Green, William: ''Observers Aircraft'', page 228. Frederick Warne Publishing, 1991. ISBN 0 7232 3697 6</ref>

(note: remove nowiki tag when input the citation. Fill the info and change the date as needed. See on source edit view mode.) Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:33, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Bhutan Army aviation[edit]

You have blanked the page. What do you mean?Xx236 (talk) 09:01, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to.

You have again tried to use wikipedia as a reference in Royal Bhutan Army Air Arm. Splitting small amounts of dubiously referenced content into new pages does not help writing the encyclopedia. You need to stop this practice, which is disruptive, and cease trying to insert self-references or you may be blocked from editing. Please add reliably sourced content. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:38, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

You need to stop disruptive editing - creating articles with very few references by splitting data from existing references, when you're not even sure what the name of the force is - or you will be blocked from editing. Find and use WP:REFERENCES. Buckshot06 (talk) 05:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@HMAS onslow: Please do specifically read wp:Circular - and I mean very carefully - as you've been repeatedly adding links to other Wikipedia articles in stead of references to reliable sources (recently here, but it really wouldn't be very difficult to find more examples in history of your edits) which is allowed only under very special circumstances (e.g. when using Wikipedia article as a primary source about Wikipedia article, not using it as a secondary source when referencing facts outside of Wikipedia) and you should stop it completely. Also, when I was checking history of your edits, it occured to me that the pattern of your edits is kind of similar to user ARA SANTA FE, sometimes even editing the same articles, so please read also this. Thank you-ז62 (talk) 12:42, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have now blocked you for two weeks for WP:DISRUPTIVE editing - persistent creation of unsuitable articles, with no attempt to engage on talkpages (bar once). Buckshot06 (talk) 10:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Revolutionary Army of the People of Guinea-Bissau[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Revolutionary Army of the People of Guinea-Bissau, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of copied without attribution from Military of Guinea-Bissau. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - [[:Military of Guinea-Bissau]]. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:Military of Guinea-Bissau]], or to discuss new information at [[Talk:Military of Guinea-Bissau|the article's talk page]].

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ymblanter (talk) 07:30, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Royal Canadian Navy Fleet Air Arm[edit]

Greetings. As you will see when you return from your block, I have redirected your article Royal Canadian Navy Fleet Air Arm to Royal Canadian Naval Air Service for a simple reason - the Royal Canadian Navy Fleet Air Arm never existed. Regards Exemplo347 (talk) 19:39, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Finnish Army Aviation[edit]

HMAS onslow: Just for your info - I proposed blanking and redirecting of the Finnish Army Aviation article you started, as it currently does not really meet even very lenient standards. If you have any reliable sources or references supporting its improvement and preservation, feel free to add them into the article and/or discuss the whole issue on the talk page. Regards--ז62 (talk) 16:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected it to the list section that it appears to have been copied from. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:19, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's your point?[edit]

You've been recently blocked for persistent creation of "new articles" by splitting text from existing articles, without adding any more information or references and frequent attempts to pass Wikipedia articles or their mirrors in stead of reliable sources - and then you start again with this? Can you provide some explanation for your behaviour? I'm sorry if I sound rather uncivil, but I kind of fail having some more patience with this kind of behaviour, sorry HMAS onslow. --ז62 (talk) 22:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately after your block expires, you go back and do the same thing that got you blocked. This time, you will have to communicate to get unblocked. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:50, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HMAS onslow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

so after thinking about why i got perm blocked and i now know that my actions are wrong and that i am not innocent for my actions. I hope that this appeal is enough and may i pls have an unblockHMAS onslow (talk) 22:46, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I don't think this request and the comment below suffice to show that you understand how your conduct was problematic. If you thought all those warnings pointing out problems with your editing were jokes, I have to wonder whether a collaborative environment like Wikipedia is the right kind of project for you. Huon (talk) 00:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi HMAS onslow. Why did you ignore previous warnings and what are you going to edit in the future? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so the reason for the ignorance of warnings is because i did not know the consequences of ignoring them and thought they wear all a joke. I will from now on type my own work and only create articles that havent already been cerated so i hope this is enough to let me get unblocked

Notice[edit]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ARA SANTA FE. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Navy of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Navy of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Brad v 01:24, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kherson class submarine[edit]

Hello, HMAS onslow. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kherson class submarine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 08:01, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vietnamese submarine Hồ Chí Minh City[edit]

Hello, HMAS onslow. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vietnamese submarine Hồ Chí Minh City, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:02, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vietnamese submarine Hồ Chí Minh City[edit]

Hello, HMAS onslow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vietnamese submarine Hồ Chí Minh City".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 05:09, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Burkina faso air force[edit]

Hello, HMAS onslow. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Burkina faso air force, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 12:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Air Force of Burkina Faso[edit]

A tag has been placed on Air Force of Burkina Faso requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/africa/bf-af.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 20:52, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]