User talk:HaapsaluYT

Proposed deletion of Marble race

The article Marble race has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 10:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RTGame YouTube.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RTGame YouTube.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Reboleira railway station moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Reboleira railway station. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 01:38, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations in Portugal opened in 1999

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations in Portugal opened in 1999 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reboleira railway station has been accepted

Reboleira railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:03, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

"Lines" in Template:Infobox station

Hi, as you've been editing (and creating, thanks!) articles about Lisbon area train stops, there's one detail I'm bringing up here: I thought the "lines" field in the station infobox was for lines, as in parts of the infrastructure, not names for services or groups of services.

This (if correct) would mean Roma-Areeiro and Entrecampos should only list the Cintura line in that field; Sete Rios would have the Cintura line and the Sete Rios direct curve(*).

I've previously adjusted the Santa Apolónia article to account for this, but I'm bringing it up in case I'm wrong about this.

(*) Another detail I'm not sure about is how to translate "concordância", I think I've seen a small number of occurrences of "direct curve" used to describe sections of track in that situation, and that, at first sight, seems adequate. I've been using it as I've not found anything better so far. I've seen it translated as "wye" in some cases, but, given the definitions I've found (such as the one in "Wye (rail)"), I think that should be the "triangle" and not the segment of track that creates the "triangle" by connecting two lines. njsg (talk) 18:29, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

You're probably right - I can go back in and change those articles. I'm used to the standard on Japanese station articles where the standard you described generally applies, but not always. For example, Shinjuku Station in the JR East section lists the Saikyo Line and Shonan-Shinjuku Line separately instead of combining them under the tracks they run on (the Yamanote Freight Line). In most situations though, the line runs on tracks of its own name (i.e. Akitsu Station), so there isn't any confusion.

As for the "concordância" situation, I'm not certain how to deal with that myself. I figure "direct curve" would work for that, but I'm not 100% sure. HaapsaluYT (talk) 18:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Railway station articles' sources

Hi HaapsaluYT, I've observed your enthusiasm for crafting Wikipedia articles centered around train stations, an interest I share. Upon reviewing a few of the sources you've included in these articles, I've noticed that some do not seem to adequately cover the information they claim to. For exemplary cited articles about rail stations in Portugal, consider exploring São Bento railway station. You may also find valuable insights in articles I've personally crafted, such as Pocinho railway station or Barca d'Alva railway station. Wishing you all the best in your future contributions, as I hope you and I can access this situation. V.B.Speranza (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, HaapsaluYT. Thank you for your work on Mira Sintra-Meleças railway station. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)