User talk:Hadoukenbellamy
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matthew Bellamy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Twilight Realm (talk) 03:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Bring Down Da House[edit]
A tag has been placed on Bring Down Da House, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Chamal Talk 02:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Bring Da House Down[edit]
A tag has been placed on Bring Da House Down requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 02:23, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism[edit]
Well, there are tools (Twinkle, Huggle etc.) to detect vandalism and special pages that show recent changes and new pages. But did you intend your edits to be vandalism? Please don't do that. If you to make unconstructive edits, you may be banned or blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chamal Talk 02:39, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- I tagged your page for having very little meaningful content. There was nothing to indicate what the awards was or who the group was. Don't take it as an accusation. We are just trying to keep Wikipedia's standards up. Oh and don't forget to sign all your comments on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). These might help you to get familiar with Wikipedia: