User talk:Hail the Dark Lord Satan

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I respectfully request that an admin grant me autoconfirm status. Thank you. Also, be aware that the use of the {{Adminhelp}} template resulted in a "Your edit was not saved because it contains a new external link to a site registered on Wikipedia's blacklist." message. Hail the Dark Lord Satan (talk) 02:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Editors are autoconfirmed. However, in some situations, it is necessary for accounts to be exempted from the customary confirmation period. Please see WP:CONFIRM if you'd like to learn more about receiving the confirmed right. Hope this helps! MJ94 (talk) 04:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much, MJ! Hail the Dark Lord Satan (talk) 04:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Username[edit]

Hi, I wanted to stop by and ask you about your username. I know you're doing a clean start and all, but perhaps a new username would work better? This one has already attracted some notice (see this UAA report) and it's easy to see how some could consider it disruptive. Cheers! TN X Man 16:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be changing it. Thank you for your concern and alerting me of the report. Up until now I had not known about it, which I find odd. Hail the Dark Lord Satan (talk) 16:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, OK. I'll mention your reply at UAA, but I think it's fair to say this could be (not saying it will be, but it is a possibility) raised at WP:RFCN. TN X Man 16:29, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this username is blocked then any username that has any religious denotation in it whatsoever must also be blocked. I've replied on the UAA with. Hail the Dark Lord Satan (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As noted immediately above, and more specifically here,[1] the user betrays that his ID was chosen "to make a point", which in itself is grounds for rejection. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names[edit]

Hello, Hail_the_Dark_Lord_Satan. Concerns have been raised that your username may be incompatible with policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it at the page for requests for comment on usernames. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name at Wikipedia:Changing username following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 17:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Old name[edit]

Hello, I was wondering what your old name was? I used to be friends with many unholy types.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 22:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asking me to disclose private information is inappropriate. Please do not ask such a thing again. It demonstrates fundamental disrespect for my privacy. Hail the Dark Lord Satan (talk) 03:29, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You opened that door by pointing out you had a previous ID. If you didn't want to be asked about it, you should have kept your trap shut. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 04:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Milowent, it wasn't me. Hey Bugs, hail to you as well. Drmies (talk) 04:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I think of it, he might actually be opposing Satanism, as his user ID is asking for chunks of ice to fall from the sky on top of him. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 06:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Lord, please let me know about your new account, the one you no doubt created after this one. I heard you may be my father. Thanks.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 18:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification[edit]

As I mentioned at ANI, since you've previously complained about not being notified about your username being reported to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention (where from what I can tell it is not required), kindly read the big orange box at WP:ANI which makes it clear it is compulsory there then go an notify all four people you have failed to notify of discussing there. (You only mentioned Jesussaves incidentally but they should still be notified.) Nil Einne (talk) 04:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 04:36, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It bothers me to think that if this editor had chosen the name Hail God, he likely wouldn't have been blocked - let alone indef blocked. GoodDay (talk) 05:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There has been extensive discussion on this particular matter, and I would advise you to bring this matter up to community discussion, if you think it truly deserves another, instead of theorizing here. ZZArch ^{talk to me} 05:59, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know that it's been discussed (wish I hadn't missed it) & that the block isn't a unilateral choice by Drmies. Thus my concerns. GoodDay (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Drmies wasn't even the one who blocked Nil Einne (talk) 19:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock for User:Hail no Deity in Particular[edit]

I was told to request an unblock for my new account User:Hail no Deity in Particular here. Please unblock that account (not this one). The rational for unblock is on the new account. Hail the Dark Lord Satan (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw this on ANI. I've looked at your article edits and they don't appear disruptive. However, I doubt any administrator is going to unblock you. My suggestion would be for you to appeal to WP:ArbCom directly by email. Beware that per WP:BLOCKEVASION you are not allowed to create or use any other account ever while this one is blocked. You are de facto banned until you can solve this matter with ArbCom. Which should take a month or so if you're lucky. ASCIIn2Bme (talk) 03:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hail the Dark Lord Satan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You're kidding, right? The block on this account is because the account name was rejected, but the block on my IP was only for 2 days. I waited for the block to end and made a new account name. I 'immediately informed the objecting editor of the new account name, so I cannot possibly be accused of block evasion. Right? Hail the Dark Lord Satan (talk) 03:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a complex block, as you claim to be an established editor undergoing WP:CLEANSTART, yet chose one of the most possibly disruptive usernames on your return. There are indeed, therefor, a few background reasons for this block: a) are you possibly avoiding WP:RTV, b) we need to know the disruption will cease, and c) is your original account currently blocked, which would not permit you to WP:CLEANSTART anyway. As such, WP:ARBCOM is your next step - you will very likely be required to advise them of your previous account, in private (you declined to provide it to us in order to check these things), in order to verify a and b above. Good luck (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were not blocked for your username, you were blocked for disruption. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 08:33, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]