User talk:Hal9000w

A pie for you![edit]

Thank you for answer. Husik Ghulyan (talk) 15:38, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hal9000w, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Hi Hal9000w! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From AFC[edit]

Do you use the AFC script to review articles or you review manually?--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 11:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-manually Hal9000w (talk) 12:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use the AFC script. It'll be easy. Also your name doesn't come to the notice at declined articles. It only says Submission declined. by whom or when, nothing.--Pratyya ^(Hello!) 03:22, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Back-Up Interceptor Control (BUIC)[edit]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Oo7565 (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Article Revision[edit]

Hello there, can you help revise this article? Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Enik_Lin Would really appreciate it if you could point where citation is needed. =) thank you

KayHana (talk) 05:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thoes Reviews of Reviews[edit]

There's discussion of some of the 'Reviews of the AfC Reviews' on the Project's Talk page. Some of us Drive participants seem to be misunderstanding what the intent of the 'Reviews of the Reviews' should be. Didn't know if you'd seen the posts - thought you might find them of interest. Shearonink (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Submission denial[edit]

Hello, i've been fairly busy and I didn't notice that my Pirates of The Caribbean article had been reviewed. You said that my article was a mixture of made-up dates and real dates, and some dates were hard to identify if they were made-up or real. After that I wrote at the top of the article that the dates that are historical are mentioned in later movies, such as the birth of Juan Ponce de León, who, in the fourth movie, Sparrow and Barbossa visit his lost ship. Or Blackbeards birth in 1680, who is portrayed as a fictionalized version of himself in On Strangers Tides. So please could you relook into my article.

                                                                                                                  JoshBlitz (talk) 22:43, 28 March 2013 (UTC)JoshBlitz[reply]

Happy Easter!!![edit]

So a print encyclopedia, a strawberry shortcake, and a sycamore walk into a bar - wait, have you heard this one? (talk) 23:36, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An Barnstar for You![edit]

	The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar
	Congratulations, Hal9000w! You're receiving a Brownie because you reviewed 41 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! Mdann52 (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]