User talk:Hamidkashifkhan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please don't post email addresses and phone numbers. Corvus cornixtalk 05:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

u rr not from balouch..y r u interrupting.mind ur own buisness

My being from Balouch has no bearing on whether or not you post personal information. Also, read WP:CIVIL and WP:OWN. Corvus cornixtalk 05:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no personal information is given..gimme ur email address ..i ll tell u there

January 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Baloch people, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- zzuuzz (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Verifiability. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornixtalk 06:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Verifiability, you will be blocked from editing. Corvus cornixtalk 06:16, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i m only editing balouch — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamidkashifkhan (talkcontribs)
That is not true. If you continue to make disruptive edits, this account will be blocked. Please stop. — Satori Son 06:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sadiq Hussain Khan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Sadiq Hussain Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ARendedWinter 14:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sadiq Hussain Khan deleted[edit]

The article Sadiq Hussain Khan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dlohcierekim 15:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to Balouch, Azad Kashmir[edit]

Discussion about what you intend to do with an article should go on the article talk page, which you can get to by clicking the tab marked "discussion" at the top of the article, rather than in the article itself. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]