Welcome to my user talk page![edit]

Please do all of the following:

Always link to the text, image, or edit you want to discuss and to the article history. When linking to an image, use a colon. For example, "[[:Image:Example.jpg]]" produces "Image:Example.jpg".
Don't forget to provide a proper Edit Summary for each and every edit, and a proper signature for each and every post to a talk page or notice board. I may revert edits that do not have such features, rather than respond to them.
Include always the reason(s) you give. I may revert edits that do not have clearly such reason(s).

July 2010[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Organic electronics. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Coasterlover1994^{Leave your mark!} 22:28, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salaam!. Why are they unconstructive?. Remember, you have to assume good faith and give a reason. --Hamiltha (talk) 12:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Fill factor. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Jeff G. ツ 04:55, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Photovoltaic micro-inverter. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. — Jeff G. ツ 05:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 05:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added my doubts about the, sometimes, obscure concepts and terminology used in the articles, to every article talk page. --Hamiltha (talk) 13:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fossil-fuel wells[edit]

Hi Hamiltha, it's not clear why you added a move proposal to the Oil well page. There was already a discussion in May. The result was 'page not moved: speedy close'. It might help if you explained on the article talk page where you are getting this 'fossil fuel well' terminology from, who uses it, how it complies with WP:NAME ? Sean.hoyland - talk 09:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is a natural-gas well an oil well?. Clearly not, natural gas is a fossil-fuel gas. So, there are two alternatives, create a natural-gas well article or rename the article with the real name, because treats oil wells and natural-gas wells. Hamiltha (talk) 09:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repeating yourself is not a good discussion technique. Please read wp:NEO for why your proposal is not appropriate on Wikipedia. 206.188.60.75 (talk) 20:10, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if English is not your first language, please be aware that there are often vast differences in terminology between languages. What may be utterly unacceptable to speakers of one language may make perfect sense to native speakers of another another (such as this oil well issue). Wikipedia articles cannot ever be the vehicle for fixing English. 206.188.60.75 (talk) 21:00, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fossil fuel drilling listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fossil fuel drilling. Since you had some involvement with the Fossil fuel drilling redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Beagel (talk) 05:18, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]