User talk:Hammelsmith/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Hammelsmith! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! HiLo48 (talk) 04:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I, Tonya plot

Thank you for trimming the plot, but it's still too long. It currently stands at 998 words and needs to be between 400 and 700, per WP:FILMPLOT. Further condensing will be most welcomed. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I looked at your edits, and I came this close to reverting all of them for not explaining what you're doing. Drmies (talk) 00:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

@Drmies: I will be conscious of using the edit summary more often. Please feel free to revert any edit of mine. I'm still a novice Wiki contributor. User:Hammelsmith (talk) 00:05, 20 September (UTC)

• Hey, I don't want to revert anything, but I do want you to explain what you're doing. And while you're at it--please combine some of them, like the ones in the same paragraph or section. Use preview if you like--but making so many small edits clogs up the edit history. Drmies (talk) 01:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tonya Harding in March 2002.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Tonya Harding in March 2002.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 23:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Non-free images

Any non-free image that you want to use on Wikipedia must comply with the non-free content guidelines. The image's use must meet all of the non-free content criteria. With respect to the image of Tonya Harding noted above, the image is from a commercial image agency, Image Direct. Because of that, the usage would be in contravention of respect for commercial opportunities, as these commercial image agencies make their money from licensing images from their catalogue. -- Whpq (talk) 23:59, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hammelsmith. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

WP:MINOR

Don't mark your edits as minor when they are not. See WP:MINOR. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

WP:Advocacy

Hey hammelsmith please stop your Pov pushing , Advocacy on Jackson related pages .Read What Wikipedia is not .Make sure you keep NPOV on wiki unless you may be blocked from further editing from wikipedia.--Akhiljaxxn (talk) 02:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Concerns

We will need you to join the talk at the bottom of the page and at this point we will need you to post on the talk page any additions you wish to add to the FA article for evaluation.--Moxy 🍁 02:36, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

News papers

I think the best way to explain why your having trouble is that newpapers are the last resort used for sourcez when the topic is a non current event. Yes news papers are used all over for current information....but nevertheless they are at the bottom threshold of what's considered a good source (see WP:NEWSORG)....basically if secondary reliable published sources do not include the information that is found at local news paper ABC or is not covered/analyzed by academic publications then that information may—by definition not be important enough to include and may cause to much weight given to a specific topic or quote. Below you can compare what news says vs other publications.-Moxy 🍁 01:53, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

June 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 1993 child sexual abuse accusations against Michael Jackson, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 13:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Can you please give me an example of this? I didn't mean to do that. Hammelsmith (talk) 14:22, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. Best, Hammelsmith (talk) 20:17, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Pinging

Would you please stop pinging me daily on issues to do with Michael Jackson? I responded on my talk page asking you to stop. Thanks. Popcornduff (talk) 10:25, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

I apologize for that, I didn't notice. I won't ping again. Best, Hammelsmith (talk) 10:31, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Google books url help

• {{Editor tools}}

Google book tool Converts bare url into {{cite book}} format with a short permanent url link that won't go dead in a week......just copy paste url☺--Moxy 🍁 23:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Just notice you use the times as well....checkout NY TIMES--Moxy 🍁 23:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you kindly. I'll work on it. Best, Hammelsmith (talk) 23:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Michael Jacobshagen and Terry George

Hammelsmith, I'd like to direct your attention to this serious article. It's a complete dossier on Michael Jacobshagen and Terry George. https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2019/07/01/michael-jacobshagen-and-terry-george/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_PouJliz3M Israell (talk) 22:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Hammelsmith, I have repeatedly told you that Jackson was not circumcised (as confirmed in his official autopsy report); Jordan Chandler erroneously stated he was circumcised. For some reason, you seem to believe each one of those accusers even though they were all thoroughly debunked! Now, have you read the article and viewed the video I linked above? If you haven't yet, please do so and then tell me what you honestly think. Israell (talk) 04:22, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Deletions at Torah Readings

Hey Hammelsmith -- I'm just curious what your reason was for deleting Biblical citations in Mishpatim, Pinechas (parsha), and Re'eh. -- Dauster (talk) 11:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

I was using a tool and didn't realize all these verses were being deleted. I will, of course, restore them. Deepest apologies. Hammelsmith (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Biodiversity Literature Repository

Hi, thank you for your edits. Was this Zootaxa pdf an URL suggested by OAbot, or one you searched yourself? The Dissemin record is a mess, but please consider that https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit/ contains (OA) figures for many (even non-OA) papers, so when you check the title of the record you need to pay attention to prefixes such as "Supplementary material 1" or "Figure 2". It's often useful to link the specific figure or appendix directly, but it's not always what you want. Nemo 07:39, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Intelligible reference names

Hi, could we please use intelligible names for references, especially when creating and using such names repeatedly to improve articles. Names such as ":0" actively decrease article quality by making editing difficult. It would be much appreciated if you could use names like "Smith Jones Robinson 2019" instead. There is far less risk of error when further material is added. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Cultural impact of Michael Jackson

Hey, Hammelsmith. Since you have a critical eye and have brought some necessary balance to the Michael Jackson topics, I think it would be a good idea for you to review Draft:Cultural impact of Michael Jackson once you're back (whether it's still a draft at that time or an article). I know that you'll be interested in checking the sources and making sure that no WP:Synthesis or WP:Editorializing is going on and will provide criticism in the article where those criticisms should be. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tonya Harding

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tonya Harding you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 12:20, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Entropy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Entropy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 08:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Entropy

The article Entropy you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Entropy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 16:41, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tonya Harding

The article Tonya Harding you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tonya Harding for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 10:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Michelson

I reverted your edit to Speed of light. The paper you linked to is Michelson's 1881 paper, not the work that was cited (Michelson and Morley, 1887).--Srleffler (talk) 23:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Srleffler, thank you for noticing that. It was better to just search for the paper manually. Best, Hammelsmith (talk) 06:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Bad link in Pythagorean theorem

Please do not add links to pirated copies of references, as you did at Pythagorean theorem in Special:Diff/958897566. The version you linked to was clearly downloaded from jstor.org, and made available in violation of their licensing terms, which do not permit indiscriminate redistribution of their content. Continued addition of copyright-violating links to Wikipedia could cause you to be blocked. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)