User talk:Hardy456

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Hardy456, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Minor edits[edit]

Hi -- Please only mark as minor edits that do not add or remove significant content: for example, changes in punctuation, syntax, or the like. Thanks, and best wishes HGilbert (talk) 15:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speech and drama[edit]

(Replying to your message on my talk page): We need to find WP:Reliable sources to establish this. These are few and far between on this subject. HGilbert (talk) 23:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One would imagine primary sources for Steiner would be texts produced by him. If you take the time to read the "Speech & Drama lectures" ISNB 0880101421, it is quite clear his and Marie Steiner's approach. For secondary literature, there is Hans Pusch "A New Kind of Actor" ISBN 09229979729, then a very interesting article "Experiences in the Realm of Dramatic Art" by Gottfried Haas-Berkow in A Man Before Others ISBN 18855840073. Then more recently the Anderson article already cited on the page.

For another perspective on Chekhov & Steiner you could look at Gilmer, Jane Margaret. "Michael Chekhov's Imagination of the Creative Word and the question of its integration into his future theatre." Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 4.2 (2013): 204-218. (Hardy456 (talk) 02:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Yes, Steiner is a primary source. But Wikipedia prefers secondary sources published by peer-reviewed journals or academic presses (see WP:RS). The Gilmer article looks good; feel free to add material drawing from this. HGilbert (talk) 03:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]