User talk:HaroldPGuy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

   Discussion Conventions

  • Please post new messages at the bottom of the page to prevent confusion.
  • Please sign your comments. Type ~~~~ after your text or use the edit toolbar.
  • Please use section headings to separate conversation topics.

See: Welcome to Wikipedia, FAQ, Wikiquette, Be nice, and Talk page guidelines.

Please don't edit my talk page.[edit]

Leave my user page alone. I have a "no dorks" policy and you are clearly violating that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.143.155.35 (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We're better than that[edit]

It must be pointed out that the edits to Rubin Carter was not part of any Gilmore Vandalism or Eversmeyer Childishness. You should know our work by now. This can not be tolerated. We will not take credit for any unfunny, meaningless, thoughtless, bush league inspired edit. The mere fact that the Rubin Carter edit was not funny should have been evidence enough. Please, in the future, be better at spotting our work for we take great pride in borfing.

Also, we're not hacks that will take credit for other people's work. We just don't roll like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.143.155.35 (talk) 16:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't used a talk page before so if I do it incorrectly, my apologies in advance. I thought you might want to undo your edit on No Country for Old Men where you removed the word 'unfortunate' regarding Moss's fate. You mention that you took it as a POV mistake, but originally I included it to give some idea of what Moss's fate was. That it's unfortunate is not a view only held by his wife, if that's what you were thinking. Ring Cinema (talk) 18:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Analysis or speculation[edit]

Do you think it's out of bounds to introduce Chigurh as a sociopath? Perhaps it would be better to leave that out of the plot section and leave it for discussion. Ring Cinema (talk) 01:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, per this, the film itself serves as the source for plot details, so I don't think we need to tag those with {{fact}}; they are verifiable from viewing the film. Rodhullandemu 16:53, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]