User talk:Harrasams

May 2016

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tracer (Overwatch)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 02:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Josh Peck with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 02:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Blake Cameron"

Blake Cameron, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is vandalism.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 02:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Melanie Van Strijp

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Melanie Van Strijp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dan D. Ric (talk) 02:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016

Hello, I'm Muon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tewfik Abdullah has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. μTalk 02:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Carpathian Shepherd Dog with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Bundaberg Rum, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 02:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

As further information, please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Wikipedia is not a blog, forum, fan site or advice site. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not include personal opinions, commentary or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. See Wikipedia:Five Pillars, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Help:Footnotes, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; and Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 02:51, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of accidents and incidents involving the DC-3 in 1942, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 02:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)