User talk:HarrietFEvans

WP:ENGVAR[edit]

Please familiarize yourself with our policy on English variations in articles. For articles that don't have strong national ties to one variant, we retain the original variant used. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI[edit]

Regarding this edit, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make any appropriate declarations. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig[edit]

I suggest you run Draft:Klook through the WP:AFC process. If it passes, you'll likely want to create a disambig page, rather than overwrite the existing redirect to Kenny Clarke; see Help:Disambiguation; Joker is an example. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk

@Ohnoitsjamie: Ah great thank you very much - I wondered how that would work! :) HarrietFEvans (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019 GOCE drive bling[edit]

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to HarrietFEvans for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE November 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk (talk) 04:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Klook (December 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klook. Please either request the deleted article for comparison at Requests for Undeletion or request Deletion Review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Klook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Klook, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HarrietFEvans! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]