User talk:Hat600

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Hat600! I am WereSpielChequers and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Ϣere SpielChequers 11:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt[edit]

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Tim Song (talk) 18:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Shanghai Metro[edit]

已回信，请见上海轨道交通讨论页。No News ! 09:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shanghai Metro renaming[edit]

Hello, I have seen that you have begun to rename Shanghai Metro articles from the XXX (Shanghai Metro) format to the XXX station format. I have seen your comments on the Talk:Shanghai Metro page but I don't understand your reasoning for renaming all the articles when the format of XXX (Shanghai Metro) is already being used without any problems. There are many examples of metro and subway systems on Wikipedia that use this system:

NYC: South Ferry – Whitehall_Street (New York City Subway)
Hong Kong: Admiralty Station (MTR)
Toronto: Don Mills (TTC)

I know there are some inconsistencies with this format but obviously it would be unfeasible to change them all to the correct format. There isn't really a format that is widely agreed upon. Doing random searches I can see XXX (system), XXX station, XXX Station, XXX (system) station, XXX (system station).

Since the examples I've listed above use this system, isn't the status quo or the current naming of articles for the Shanghai Metro fine? If the format was incorrect I am sure the contributors to the New York City Subway would have changed it by now. I feel at this time it is unnecessary. THank you. Heights^{(Want to talk?)} 17:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they have XXX (line) but that makes sense to distinguish between the stations on different lines. And if you see the articles that dont have other stations with the same name, they do have (New York City Subway) attached to them. What is weird to you isn't incorrect. Heights^{(Want to talk?)} 17:41, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello. I have discussed this with the people at Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains and it seems that there is no standard naming convention. Your idea that your convention is "better" is not correct as they dont have a standard, and none of them are "better." However, if you wish to rename all of the articles in that fashion (convention), you can do so without any further objection from me. I see that you have already renamed several articles. To ensure a consistent naming convention, you should probably rename all of the other articles. Maybe with something like Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser like you mentioned. Alternatively, you can rename the articles back. I understand that you want to keep with the convention most widely used for Asian systems and that is fine. Heights^{(Want to talk?)} 02:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Beijing Subway image[edit]

While looking through your English version of the Beijing Subway map, I noticed that you had two of the Line 6 stages, Huangqu and Changying, mixed up on the map. Ac2k (talk) 18:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Hat600. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hat600. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Hat600. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]