User talk:Hattom

Speedy deletion nomination of The Little Dum Dum Club with Tommy Dassalo and Karl Chandler[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Little Dum Dum Club with Tommy Dassalo and Karl Chandler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 13:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at The Little Dum Dum Club with Tommy Dassalo and Karl Chandler[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Little Dum Dum Club with Tommy Dassalo and Karl Chandler. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:09, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at The Little Dum Dum Club with Tommy Dassalo and Karl Chandler, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reported to AIV[edit]

Hi Hattom, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported the issue of you removing speedy deletion templates to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 14:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removing speedy dbs[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Ian Cairns (talk) 14:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hattom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yo no hablo sin Americano Hattom (talk) 14:21, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have restored the block notice and the block-related warnings, as they are relevant to any unblock requests you may make - you are welcome to remove them once unblocked, but until then please leave them -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock | reason=Je suis juste un petit salon fillette temps dans un monde petit temps [[User:Hattom|Hattom]] ([[User talk:Hattom#top|talk]]) 14:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)}}

After your last attempt (now removed) I have upped your block to indefinite and have revoked your talk page access - you are clearly not here to edit constructively. If you wish to appeal your block now, please see WP:BASC -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]